Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Not Too Late for Daniels to Run, or to Formulate a Foreign Policy

Mitch Daniels appeared at the American Enterprise Institute today (you can watch his speech here on YouTube) to speak about the education reforms he pushed through in the recently concluded session of the Indiana General Assembly. But inevitably, the subject of his possible presidential campaign came up. Daniels didn’t have an answer but he did protest that he has plenty of time to decide.

He’s right about that. Despite the eagerness of the press corps to begin reporting on his candidacy and the desperation of many Republicans who are lamenting the thin field of declared contenders, Daniels can take as much time as he wants in deciding. In fact, the longer he waits the better it will probably be for him. The prolonged and artificially-enhanced tension that such a wait will provoke among voters and the press can only make him seem more desirable. Spending the summer chasing around Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina with the likes of Ron Paul, Rick Santorum, and Herman Cain won’t enhance his desirability to GOP primary voters or caucus-goers. But a summer spent keeping the press and the party on their edge of their collective chairs waiting for his decision will make his eventual decision seem as if it is being handed down from Mount Sinai.

But as this week’s events ought to have brought home to him, Daniels should spend some of that time formulating some coherent positions on foreign policy. As governor of Indiana, he could afford to ignore security issues and concentrate on being America’s leading fiscal conservative/domestic policy wonk. As a presidential candidate, Daniels will need to present a viable case for his being a commander-in-chief. He will need to communicate a vision of how to deal with threats from Iran and its terrorist allies as well as the many other foreign policy dilemmas the next president will face.

Keeping us all guessing about his willingness to run is one thing. Keeping us guessing about his positions on war and peace is quite another.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.