Commentary Magazine


Contentions

A Question for Petraeus on the Palestinians

Senators will likely seize upon the confirmation hearing for General David Petraeus to be CIA director as an occasion to debate the value of enhanced interrogations. The bin Laden hit should have put that debate to rest, but it remains a political football, and many senators just cannot let it go. Still, as President Obama has managed to put the Palestinian-Israeli conflict front-and-center again, driving massacres in Libya, Syria, and Yemen, and Egypt’s shaky outlook at least temporarily out of the headlines, senators might productively use the confirmation hearings to flesh out the views of both accomplished men on key issue of peace process policy.

One of the Clinton administration’s more disastrous moves, for example, was to use the CIA to monitor and, in some cases train, Palestinian security forces. The problem with CIA involvement is twofold: First, it erodes the already tenuous wall between intelligence and policy; and second, for the CIA operative on the ground, peace is less a priority than access. This in turn leads to protection of certain men as sources, regardless of the crimes they commit.  CIA involvement in the militia-training may lead it to turn a blind eye to bad apples, so long as they have loose lips and open palms. During and after the Clinton era, some elite Palestinian security men applied lessons from their training to build a new generation of better-trained terrorists.

General Petraeus, of course, has a storied history in Iraq and Afghanistan. He has never refused to take on the tough assignments, and refused to shy away from missions which many other men dismissed as impossible or dead end. In both Iraq and Afghanistan, Petraeus has embraced the creation of local forces and sub-national militias. Before he moves onto this new and important post, it might behoove the Senate to ask Petraeus to assess Clinton’s approach, and to discuss what lessons learned, if any, from his Iraq and Afghanistan experience he would apply to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Regardless of how he responds, his answer will be illuminating.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.