Commentary Magazine


Contentions

More on Ryan and Medicare and 2012

I would like to revise and extend my remarks from last night regarding the meaning of the special election in New York. I do not think the Paul Ryan budget poses a mortal danger to Republicans in 2012, or that Paul Ryan has become an albatross. The fact that Republicans have put the only serious proposal on the table to deal with the coming budget calamity will count in their favor with independent voters next year—though it must be said that the specifics of that proposal are worthy of debate and revision and should not be considered sacrosanct.

Case in point: This morning brought more bad economic news, with a gigantic drop in durable goods orders and sales that is part, but only part, of the reason forecasters are significantly downgrading  their expectations on second-quarter GDP growth. Anemic growth is not only troubling for the president and the Democrats because of the negligible effect it will have on pocketbooks and employment; it will also make the eyepopping deficit and debt numbers even more eye-popping as we head into 2012.

In isolation, as was the case of this special election, Democrats and Obama can focus on supposed GOP threats to Medicare. But the president and his party next year will have to account for the economy and the size of government as a whole, and even with an openly biased press trying to secure his reelection, Obama will not be able to flee from explaining what it is he intends to do to avoid the cliff, or the brick wall, or the chasm, or whatever metaphor you can find for the moment when the entitlements literally eat up the entire federal budget. And, as Jonathan points out, he will have to account as well for the changes to Medicare in his own health-care plan, which remains unpopular.

All that said, the notion that Paul Ryan himself is in a position to be the standard-bearer for the Republican party in 2012 was dealt a mortal blow last night. He has said he isn’t going to run, but if the party and its leaders were to coalesce around the idea of him running over the course of the next six weeks, his decision could have been overturned. That won’t happen now.


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.