Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Kudos to Pawlenty for Standing on Principle

I have been complaining that too many Republicans seem eager to run away from their party’s proud legacy of being strong on national security policy. But there are some notable exceptions, including presidential candidate Tim Pawlenty. As Jonathan noted earlier, today he gave an outstanding address at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York about how the U.S. should deal with the revolutions sweeping the Middle East. 

He laid out a compelling approach for adhering to our pro-democracy principles while also being aware of the need to take on-the-ground realities into account in their implementation. He staked out a strongly pro-Israel position and backed reform in moderate monarchies such as Jordan and Morocco while issuing an unwavering call for regime change in Syria and Iran.

He tore into President Obama for failing “to formulate and carry out an effective and coherent strategy in response to these events”—and into “parts of the Republican Party,” which “now seem to be trying to out-bid the Democrats in appealing to isolationist sentiments. “ His best line: “America already has one political party devoted to decline, retrenchment and withdrawal.  It does not need a second one.”

Of course any politician can deliver a good speech. But Pawlenty showed in the question and answer session that he understood what he was talking about. Several times he was asked what we should do when democracy is likely to bring a more anti-American regime into power. He deftly parried by arguing—rightly—that in the case of countries like Egypt simply supporting the status quo is not tenable; far better to push for change in the right direction.

Kudos to Pawlenty for standing on principle. He is standing up for his party’s best tradition, which is represented by Teddy Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan—not Herbert Hoover and Calvin Coolidge. Not only is this good policy, but it should be good politics too. He is differentiating himself from the horde of poll-followers in today’s GOP leadership ranks.




Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.