Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Reconciling May 19, May 20 and May 22

The State Department says the Quartet held a “good meeting” Friday — they issued no statement at the end, but began “a conversation about when they’re going to meet next.” Perhaps the Quartet is having trouble reconciling its May 20 statement, supporting President Obama’s “May 19 vision,” with the President’s May 22 speech that modified it. The Quartet – like the State Department – may be unclear how the two presidential speeches relate.     

Maybe we can help — by combining the May 22 restatement of the May 19 vision with the general principles of the Quartet’s May 20 statement. On May 22, the President specified what “1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps” means: 

By definition, it means that the parties themselves — Israelis and Palestinians — will negotiate a border that is different than the one that existed on June 4, 1967 … to account for the changes that have taken place over the last 44 years … including the new demographic realities on the ground … The ultimate goal is two states for two people: Israel as a Jewish state and the homeland for the Jewish people and the State of Palestine as the homeland for the Palestinian people — each state in joined self-determination, mutual recognition, and peace. 

So the vision is mutual recognition of “two states for two peoples” with a border that accounts for the new demographic realities on the ground. Combine that with the May 20 Quartet statement calling for “direct bilateral negotiations without delay or preconditions,” and add — since the Quartet reiterated its “previous statements and principles” — the principle repeated over and over and over,  unilateral actions will not be recognized by the international community.

Finally, add the principle borders must be “defensible” — as the Clinton and Bush administrations (and Obama himself in his let-me-be-clear 2008 AIPAC address) formally assured Israel. No need to reference the 1967 lines, since no one considers them defensible, and the new border – as the President helpfully clarified – will necessarily be different.

So here is a draft of the next Quartet statement, harmonizing all of the above:

The Quartet supports President Obama’s vision of “two states for two peoples,” to be mutually recognized in direct bilateral negotiations conducted without preconditions, accounting for demographic realities on the ground and establishing defensible borders. The Quartet will not recognize any unilateral attempt to establish different borders in a different forum.

The Palestinians will not endorse such a statement, because they will not: (1) agree to two states “for two peoples” (which implicitly rejects a “right of return”); (2) negotiate without preconditions; (3) recognize demographic realities on the ground; (4) endorse defensible borders; or (5) stop their unilateral effort to establish different borders via the UN. But at least the statement would help identify the actual “obstacles to peace.”


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.