Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Assads Still Play By the “Hama Rules”

In February 1982, Syrian dictator Hafez al-Assad decided to send a message to dissidents in the city of Hama. Protests against his regime were met with a full-scale military offensive that left 10,000-20,000 Syrians dead. From that moment on, it became a cliché to say that brutal autocrats like Assad played by the “Hama Rules,” a phrase that brought to mind heartless slaughter and made it clear anyone who dared to oppose him would face death.

Nearly three decades later, the first name of the man atop the Assad family clan may be different, but there’s little doubt his son Bashar and his minions are still playing by the same rules. There’s no telling exactly how many Syrians have been killed during the months of Arab Spring protests in that country, but the number–believed to be in the hundreds–continues to climb. Today, the focus is once again on Hama, where the Syrian army and security services have massed their forces. Reports say another 10 persons were shot dead there by the government. Whether this is the prelude to another 1982-style massacre is unclear, but it is apparent the residents of the city of 650,000 fear it may be so. Reports speak of barricades being erected in the streets to impede the army’s advance.

Throughout this crisis, the United States has either downplayed events in Syria or sought to ignore them. In his defense of the U.S. intervention in Libya, President Obama said his purpose was to stop one of the world’s worst dictators from slaughtering a lot of people. The same could be said of Syria, where the United States and its European allies have simply watched as a potentially far worse scenarios than the one prevented in Libya unfolds.

The United States cannot right every wrong in the world. But by playing favorites with Arab dictators — both of whom are major sources of support for international terrorism — Obama’s seeming acquiescence to Assad’s crimes has implicitly undermined the case for Libya.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.