Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Pollsters Divided Over Whether Americans Oppose Tax Hikes

A Quinnipiac poll received a lot of attention this morning after it found that voters favor tax hikes in any deficit plan 67 to 25 percent. Now Rasmussen has released a contradictory poll, indicating that voters oppose tax hikes 55 to 34 percent.

So why the discrepancy? Ed Morrissey points out it might have to do with the way the questions were worded in each of the polls:

The difference might be in the way the questions were asked, being mindful of the Pollster-in-Chief’s warning on survey language.  Rasmussen’s question seems a little more straightforward, if generic:

As part of Legislation to Raise Debt Ceiling Should Congress and President Raise Taxes?

Quinnipiac is more specific:

Do you think any agreement to raise the national debt ceiling should include only spending cuts or should it also include an increase in taxes for the wealthy and corporations?

Morrissey suspects Quinnipiac’s use of the buzzword “wealthy” might have prompted more emotionally-charged responses.

“Quinnipiac would have been better off to have avoided the term — ‘higher income earners’ would have been more accurate, objective, and less prone to the emotional responses that come with “wealthy,” he wrote.

If that’s the case, the polls may tell us more about the power of messaging in this debate than anything else. Americans don’t seem to have any reservations about raising taxes on rich people, which is how the Democrats have been framing the issue. But when faced with the possibility they may be impacted by these tax increases — as Rasmussen’s vague wording suggests — they’re strongly opposed to it. Republicans have been trying to make the case the tax hikes Democrats support will have a disastrous impact on the average American, and this seems to be a compelling argument with voters. But until more affirmative polls come out, we won’t know which party’s narratives has gained the most ground.


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.