Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Pie Incident Shows Pettiness of Murdoch Critics

Rupert Murdoch’s opponents may have jumped the shark with the pie-in-the-face attack during his testimony today. Not only did Murdoch come off as a sympathetic figure, but his political enemies exposed themselves as people motivated by hatred for the media mogul rather than ethical concerns.

The legendary newspaper titan appeared diminished as he stumbled through the questioning, alternatively pounding the table with his fist, interrupting his son with non sequiturs, and pleading ignorance to many of the questions.

“This is the most humble day of my life,” he interjected at one point.

“The great old man of newspapers looked hopelessly out of touch in the early stages of the father and son grilling in front of MPs today,” wrote the Guardian’s Dan Sabbagh.

Whether Murdoch’s behavior was genuine or an intentional strategy, his doddering testimony may have helped boost his public image. Instead of coming off as divisive, he seemed like a fairly harmless octogenarian on the brink of retirement.

Cementing this image was the activist who hit Murdoch with a pie in the face. After all, it’s hard not to feel sympathy for an 80-year-old man getting attacked – on live TV, on the “most humbled” day of his life – by an obnoxious young comedian.

The attack “transformed Murdoch into a sympathetic figure, an old man under attack from a young one,” wrote Paul Owen at the Guardian. “He ended the session having the last word, able to express his contrition to the country.”

And fortunately for Murdoch, it may have transformed the storyline. The pie incident is currently dominating headlines, and much of the coverage is sympathetic. The Los Angeles Times led its story on the hearing with, “News Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch endured not only verbal blows but also an attempted physical attack Tuesday.”

Murdoch’s opponents were hoping to embarrass him. Instead, they ended up looking petty and politically-motivated – which is probably the best outcome News Corp. could have hoped for.


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.