Commentary Magazine


Contentions

NY Times: It’s the Democrats Who Are Blocking a Deal

Though we’ve been told again and again how irresponsible, obstinate Republicans were blocking a deal on the debt ceiling, the New York Times admits this morning the Democrats have actually emerged as the primary obstacle to an agreement.

The home-page headline of the story is “Challenge to a Budget Deal: Selling It to Democrats.” Sure enough, as the third paragraph of the article tells us: “This time, the flak came mostly from senior congressional Democrats, who are angry at some of Mr. Obama’s concessions and at being excluded from the talks.”

So congressional Democrats don’t want to make serious concessions and are allowing their bruised egos to dictate their response to compromise. But wait, there’s more: “Congressional Democrats already are suggesting the potential Obama-Boehner deal is more tilted toward Republican priorities than a bipartisan plan suggested this week by the so-called Gang of Six senators, three Republicans and three Democrats.” So the Democrats are also expressing their ideological inflexibility.

This is a far cry from the “Democrats are willing to do anything to save the economy” narrative the media has been pushing until now. That narrative was first dented by yesterday’s release of a CNN poll that showed 66 percent of Americans support the “Cut, Cap, and Balance” bill House Republicans passed earlier this week, but which Democrats have opposed and Obama threatened to veto.

One reason Obama and John Boehner have kept quiet about their latest round of negotiations is to stave off an outcry that would torpedo a deal before it can even be presented to either party. We saw an example of this yesterday when the Times tweeted that the two sides were close to a deal, and then the White House and GOP leaders immediately denied it.

This is now the third Republican plan that has met resistance from Democrats. There is more public support for the GOP than previously thought. And it looks like the media is finally taking notice.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.