Commentary Magazine


Contentions

In Light of Progressives’ Defeat, Attempts at Stoking Class Warfare Accelerate

Throughout the debt ceiling debates, President Obama appeared on national television numerous times attempting to shift blame for the country’s pending economic doom on Republican fat cats and corporate jet owners. As the debt crisis went on, the president’s approval numbers hit record lows, despite numerous attempts to make himself clear. The financial crisis wasn’t because the country was spending more than it was taking in, it was because of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (read: it’s still Bush’s fault). Our record deficit isn’t because entitlement spending is over 10 percent of our GDP and growing rapidly; it’s because the rich aren’t paying their fair share.

In the Wall Street Journal  last week, Senator Bernie Sanders started off an opinion piece by saying, “The rich are getting richer.” Despite the fact the top 25 percent of income earners pay 85 percent of the federal income bill, the president and his progressive allies wanted more.

The media and celebrity culture offered a helping hand to the narrative. Numerous celebrities stated their willingness to be taxed at a higher rate themselves. (The Treasury Department is still waiting for their donations.) Despite these continued efforts to demonize the rich to avert attention from the debt crisis by the liberal-dominated media and Hollywood crowd, Americans weren’t buying it. Before the debt deal was signed, Gallup released a poll indicating 50 percent of Americans wanted a solution with only or mostly spending cuts, while only 11 percent favored a solution with only or mostly tax increases.

Shortly after signing the debt deal yesterday, the president again called for the “wealthiest Americans and richest corporations” to pay more. In the wake of the progressives’ disappointment about the agreement, the Obama administration is struggling to reinvigorate the left-wing base as fundraising numbers continue to fall short of expectations. Expect more instances of base-riling class warfare language (and coverage in a sympathetic media) in an attempt to regain the buzz from the 2008 campaign–with “Blame the Rich” replacing “Blame Bush” as a key campaign angle.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.