Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Quartet Shows More One-Sided “Concern”

Yesterday the Quartet issued a statement declaring it was “greatly concerned” about Israel’s approval of 277 apartments in Ariel in the West Bank, and reaffirmed that “unilateral action … cannot prejudge the outcome of negotiations.” The State Department spokesperson stated the U.S. considered the Israeli announcement “deeply troubling.” The Palestinian spokesman accused Israel of trying to destroy the peace process.

More than 19,000 people live in Ariel, and another 11,000 live in the bloc north of it, so the 277 units are less than one percent of the total population. The units will be constructed in the center of town, so there will be no expansion of Ariel’s boundaries. Elliott Abrams noted yesterday that the Bush administration had agreed with Israel on the principles governing settlements — no new settlements or expansion of the land area of existing ones — and that the phrase used to describe the agreement was “build up and in, not out:”

The usual complaints about new construction in the settlements were that “it is making a final peace agreement impossible” or at least more and more difficult by “taking more Palestinian land” that would have to be bargained over in the end and whose taking would right now interfere with Palestinian life and livelihoods. We understood that there would never be a long construction freeze … especially the “major blocks” that Israel will keep [which] are living communities with growing families.  So we reached that understanding with the Israelis: build up and in, not out.  That way whatever the chances of a peace deal were, construction in the settlements would not reduce them.

As the Abrams post makes clear, the settlements are a side issue – blown out of proportion by the Obama administration from the beginning, when it reneged on the prior understanding with Israel and refused to endorse the 2004 Bush letter – and the Quartet now seems to serve only the function of regularly meeting to condemn Israel.

The Quartet had nothing to say yesterday about the unilateral action of the Palestinian Authority, which has repeatedly said it plans to go to the UN next month in an attempt to prejudge the outcome of negotiations — after ignoring a ten-month construction moratorium, which included Ariel, that expired nearly a year ago. The statement the Quartet should have issued is here.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.