Commentary Magazine


Posts For: August 28, 2011

Perry-Romney Feud: Hype or Reality?

Given the fact the two heaviest hitters in the Republican presidential race are probably going to be slugging it out until late spring next year, there’s every likelihood the confrontation between Mitt Romney and Rick Perry is going to get nasty. But for those who can’t wait until the mud starts flying for real, Politico gives us a preview of the imminent Romney-Perry smackdown today. According to author Maggie Haberman, it’s already “personal” between the two.

The origins of this grudge supposedly date back to a 2006 dispute. But the article’s main assertion has less to do with Perry’s capacity for holding a grudge than it does with the idea that virtually everyone at the highest levels of the GOP thinks Romney is a phony. Which leads me to wonder whether talk of a genuine feud between Romney and Perry is more hype than reality.

Read More

Abbas Still Looking for Pre-UN Bribe

Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas has reiterated his determination to go ahead with his attempt to get the United Nations to recognize an independent Palestinian state without asking it to make peace with Israel. But, as the Jerusalem Post reports, he is not averse to being bribed to back away from an effort he knows is doomed to failure with more Israeli concessions. Abbas said yesterday he would give up on the UN effort in exchange for Israel halting all settlement building and agreeing on the 1967 lines as the basis for future negotiations. But he also added he would never agree to recognize Israel as a Jewish state.

What exactly Israel would then negotiate is unclear, because it would have effectively given up all its cards prior to the talks. Nor is there any reason for Israel to make unilateral concessions if in the end the Palestinians are still unwilling to end the conflict, as would be the case if they recognized the legitimacy of a Jewish state. But, as has been apparent since 2008, Abbas’ goal is not negotiations but the avoidance of them.

Read More

Hurricane Irene as the “Harbinger” of More Warming Propaganda

Few aspects of contemporary debate are as dreary as the politicization of weather. Government officials have always known — or at least should have always known — they will be blamed for natural disasters, especially if they are not conducting rescue or cleanup activities with sufficient zeal. But just as depressing and unenlightening is the practice of using instances of extreme weather — be they hot or cold, wet or dry — as “proof” the planet is warming.

The arrival of Hurricane Irene this morning in the Northeast was used as an excuse for the New York Times to trot out the theory the increasing number of highly destructive storms is yet another indicator the planet is melting. Under the headline “Seeing Irene as a Harbinger of a Change in Climate,” the Times article promised to explain how warming is responsible for more hurricanes that do more damage. Except, much like Irene herself, which was no treat for those in low-lying coastal areas but was otherwise nothing close to the apocalypse predicted only a couple of days ago, the piece did no such thing.

Read More