Commentary Magazine


Contentions

A Danger in Idle Threats

I’ve been on the road and so am late reacting to comments Adm. Mike Mullen, the outgoing chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, gave before the Senate Armed Services Committee on September 22, but they are worth considering:

I think over the summer there was a significant spike into what the secretary said earlier with respect to Iran supporting two Shi’a extremist groups, AAH [Asaib Ahl al-Haq] and KH [Kata’ib Hezbollah]. And they have control of that — very clear. Because we went by several channels, but politically to Iraq; Iraq went to Iran, and it stopped. So it is — there’s no question that Iran can control this, and it’s a very dangerous potential. And they’re shipping EFPs [Explosively Formed Projectiles] and IRAMs [improvised rocket-assisted munitions] in particular, and the IRAMs are getting bigger and bigger… If they keep killing our troops, that will not be something we will just sit idly by and watch.

While I would normally applaud the notion the White House and Pentagon will not “sit idly by and watch” as adversaries murder Americans, there is a danger in idle threats. After all, during the tenures of both Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, if not American policy, it was the American reality that the White House and Pentagon did “just sit idly by and watch” as the Iranian government kept killing our troops. Frankly, that was also the reality of the Clinton years as well given Iranian complicity in the Khobar Towers bombing.

The point of this is not simply to lament that recent administrations have been asleep at the switch when it comes to ensuring there is a cost to murdering Americans. Rather, the problem is from an Iranian perspective, American redlines are drawn with a feather in the sand. Overconfidence can lead to misjudgment and conflict. Unless we find a way to restore our credibility and convince adversaries the cost of killing Americans will be too high for them to bear, we’ll be doing our men and women in uniform and our own national security a severe disservice.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.