Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Does OWS Nullify “Tea Party” as Election Attack?

This new ad from Priorities USA Action, an Obama PAC, is a helpful preview of the kind of attacks Mitt Romney can look forward to during the general election, if he ends up securing the nomination:

The Obama PAC ad shuffles through three basic Romney attacks:

  1. The Tea Party: the ad shows a clip of Romney hesitating before saying “I’m for the Tea Party.” Then it cuts to a video of Tea Partiers marching angrily with signs.
  2. Job Creation: the ad calls out Romney for the layoffs he oversaw during his time at Bain Capitol, and the fact that Massachusetts rated very low for job creation when he was running the state.
  3. Class warfare: there are clips of Romney arguing that “corporations are people” and allegations that he receives support from “Wall Street.”

The job creation and class warfare criticism are predictable. But the fact that the Obama PAC seems to be highlighting Romney’s hesitation on the Tea Party is interesting. It makes you wonder whether the Obama campaign is planning to use this as a wedge issue to force Romney into taking a clearer stance on the Tea Party – either back away from it, or embrace it more strongly.

The Republican base is already suspicious of Romney, so if he seems to be distancing himself from the Tea Party it could really hurt him with conservatives. On the other hand, if Romney aligns himself with the Tea Party, the Obama campaign could use that as a way to portray him as “extreme” and out of touch with the American public.

It would be an interesting tactic, but is it neutralized now that Obama and the Democratic Party have publicly declared their support for Occupy Wall Street? Tea Party rallies look like economics seminars at the Brookings Institute when compared to the violent chaos at OWS protests. With Occupy activists dissolving into mob violence, it’s going to be hard to argue that supporting the Tea Party is “extreme” but supporting OWS isn’t. If anything, the Occupiers are making the Tea Partiers look exceptionally calm and rational.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.