Commentary Magazine


Contentions

“Occupy Shabbat” Offensive to Tradition

Occupy Wall Street’s observance of the Jewish festivals last month got quite some publicity – there were ‘Occupy Yom Kippur’ services, a Sukkah (tabernacle) for ‘Occupy Sukkot’, and ‘Occupy Simchat Torah’ celebrations (Rejoicing of the Law).

But these festivals, as with ‘Occupy Shabbat’ this week, were not routinely observed because they happened to coincide with the protests, but rather were misappropriated for political ends.

On Yom Kippur, they asked, “But is fasting and beating our chests really the best we can do to redeem ourselves?” and answered that really we should undertake our fast “by joining the demonstrators in Zuccotti Park, and holding our Yom Kippur services there amongst the oppressed, hungry, poor and naked.”

They understood Sukkot as representing “shelter in a time of crisis, the halfway point between slavery and liberation,” with the sukkah serving “not only…as a metaphor for the shelter of the Israelites. It will be a space to challenge economic injustice, racism, oppression, displacement, and exploitation that so many in our country and world face.”

And similarly for Simchat Torah.

And similarly for Shabbat this week, which will function as a “weekend of nationwide solidarity, learning and reflection around food justice. The learning and exploring of Global Hunger Shabbat is designed as a springboard into meaningful action over the following weeks and months, as we mobilize the American Jewish community in the fight for food justice. The issue of food justice is deeply entwined with the issue of economic justice being pursued by the protesters at Occupy Wall Street and at occupations around the nation and the world.”

I have written elsewhere about the misappropriation of the Jewish tradition for political ends, particularly when tikkun olam is involved. Sometimes the politics are worthy, but should not come at the expense of the integrity of the Jewish tradition. More often though, the politics are nefarious, even contrary to the dictates of Jewish law, and, in their disingenuous distortion, offensive to the tradition. Sadly, “Occupy Judaism” seems to instantiate the latter.

 


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.