Commentary Magazine


Posts For: November 8, 2011

Romney Speaks Out on Cain Allegations

Should Mitt Romney have kept his mouth shut on this? Maybe, but after Newt Gingrich weighed in on the matter I’m not sure what the harm is. The allegations are serious, and Romney may win some brownie points for at least being honest about it:

Mitt Romney today for the first time characterized sexual harassment allegations facing fellow GOP candidate Herman Cain as “particularly disturbing.”

“These are serious allegations, George,” said Romney in an exclusive interview with George Stephanopoulos that aired on ABC News and Yahoo. ”And they’re going to have to be addressed seriously. I don’t have any counsel for Herman Cain or for his campaign, they have to take their own counsel on this.”

“Any time there is an accuser that comes forward with charges of this nature you recognize this is a very serious matter and it should be taken seriously,” said Romney.

Read More

Cain Has Shown His Limitations

If you want to watch an uncomfortable moment from the “debate” between Newt Gingrich and Herman Cain this weekend, take a look at Cain’s answer on whether he preferred a premium support or a defined benefit plan in the context of Medicare. These are the type of policy questions that presumably should be in Cain’s wheelhouse. His main selling point, after all, is that he’s a successful businessman who knows how to right our economic ship; and no program has more bearing on our fiscal future than Medicare. Yet on what is a fairly basic question about Medicare, Cain is utterly lost. That ought to matter to conservatives as they determine who is the individual best equipped to prosecute the case against President Obama less than a year from now.

I understand early on there was a certain freshness to Cain’s style. But we’ve now had several months in which we’ve been able to watch Cain in debates, during interviews, and at center stage, raising this question: Has any recent major presidential candidate shown as little mastery of the basics, when it comes to policy matters, as Cain? He’s shown his limitations time and time again, from debates in which he can’t articulate his policy preference on Afghanistan, to his cluelessness on the so-called Palestinian “right of return,” to his contradictory stands when it comes to abortion and a willingness to trade GITMO prisoners for hostages, to his (unconstitutional) declaration that he would not appoint a Muslim to his cabinet or a federal judgeship, to his inability to defend his 9-9-9 tax plan. Yet some defenders of Cain actually celebrate his lack of knowledge, portraying it as a virtue, a sign that he’s an outsider, a non-establishment figure, authentic, the appealing anti-politician.

Read More

Re: The Myth of Israel’s Rightward Turn

Evelyn Gordon’s post convincingly demonstrates that on every issue in the “peace process” the Israeli public has moved not right but left — so far left that the peace settlement Yitzhak Rabin outlined in his final Knesset address is very far to the right of the Israeli mainstream today.

What about the Palestinians? In the last 11 years — after they rejected the Clinton parameters that would have given them a state on 97 percent of the West Bank and Gaza with a capital in Jerusalem and a “right of return” to the new Palestinian state — they have not moved at all.

Read More

Holder on Fast and Furious: “It Won’t Happen Again”

If Eric Holder were a similarly negligent air traffic controller or pharmacist, he would almost definitely be out of a job right now. But as attorney general of the United States, apparently he gets a little more leeway. Here he is pleading ignorance and regret while getting grilled by the Senate Judiciary Committee today:

“This operation was flawed in concept, as well as in execution,” Mr. Holder told the committee. “Unfortunately, we will feel its effects for years to come as guns that were lost during this operation continue to show up at crime scenes both here and in Mexico. This should never have happened. And it must never happen again.” …

Mr. Holder has said he didn’t know about the tactics used in Fast and Furious. Messrs. Issa and Grassley say the attorney general has provided misleading and incomplete explanations.

In May, Mr. Holder told Congress he first heard of the Fast and Furious tactics in the past few weeks. Critics say that was misleading. On Tuesday, Mr. Holder gave a timeline of events that showed he learned of the matter early this year. In response to a question, he told the committee, “I probably could have said ‘a couple of months.’ ”

Read More

As Usual, Obama Can Count on Bibi

To add to Evelyn’s excellent post on the disrespectful and disreputable way Yitzhak Rabin’s memory is used and abused by the left, in which Evelyn ably dispels the myth of Israeli political extremism, the Wall Street Journal reports today that Benjamin Netanyahu is planning a significant crackdown on settlements.

This would be the same Netanyahu that President Obama and French President Nicolas Sarkozy apparently got caught complaining about at a private meeting. While Obama and Sarkozy are busy fighting over who hates Netanyahu more after the Obama administration bungled the peace process in colossal fashion, Netanyahu has apparently initiated what the Journal suggests could be “the largest evacuation of settlers since the 2005 Gaza withdrawal.”

Read More

The Difference between Fantasy and Sci Fi

In his Jewish Review of Books essay that I have been quoting the past few days, Michael Weingrad says provocatively that “Christianity is a fantasy religion,” while “Judaism is a science fiction religion.” From this angle, it’s no accident that several classics of sci fi — Walter Miller’s Canticle for Leibowitz (1959), Philip K. Dick’s Man in the High Castle (1962), Philip José Farmer’s To Your Scattered Bodies Go (1971), Robert Silverberg’s Book of Skulls (1973) — have Jewish characters and themes.

Christianity posits an “other” world, a kingdom of the spirit, where a higher law is in force. And as it happens, this is exactly the mode of thought that gives rise to fantasy as a branch of literature. Fantasy is the kind of fiction that sets aside physical law to obey a law of the writer’s devising. G. K. Chesterton calls this sovereign law “the ethics of elfland.” Fantasy must remain faithful to it, just as physical actuality is faithful to physical law. (Fiction that cheats on the ethics of its own world is lousy fiction.) Obviously, there is going to be overlap between the two legal systems. But fantasy is independent of physical law, “exempt from the conditions,” in Henry James’s words, that usually “drag upon” human experience.

Science fiction is founded upon a different way of thinking. My friend Andrew Fox, author of The Good Humor Man, says it well. “SF deals with extrapolations of theoretically possible developments in technology, the sciences, or society,” he observes, while “fantasy deals with events and phenomena which are not within the realm of the physically possible.”

That’s a great description of Jewish life — “extrapolations of the theoretically possible.” It is absurd to keep kosher, it is not easy or convenient, there is no good nutritional reason to do so, it makes no logical sense, but it is possible. Pretty much the same could be said for circumcision, daily prayer, Shabbat, taharat hamishpaha, studying the rituals of the Temple, or almost any of the 613 commandments that Orthodox Jews are required to obey. Jewish law is not the law of another world.

Even the Kabbalah, which appears magical and other-worldly to outsiders, is firmly rooted in the physically possible. The Sefirot, the ten “spheres” of creation, might seem to imply the existence of ten autonomous spiritual realms, but they are, say the mystical experts, “numerically definable.” They are the source of everything in material creation. When Kabbalists measure the limbs of God, they are certain that the limbs are actually that long. The entire purpose of Kabbalah, first, last, and always, is to renew and refresh the obedience to God’s law.

The Jewish aversion to fantasy arises from the Jewish attachment to physical possibility, the confidence that it is entirely possible to serve God in this world, where it is entirely possible for God to be. To the Jews, however — the crew of Spaceship Israel, the people of the alternate history — science fiction feels just like home.

Update: In the original version, I quietly edited Andrew Fox’s remark. In a note to me, he had referred to science fiction as SF. “San Francisco?” I wondered. So I changed it to what I assumed was the standard abbreviation. Andrew has now written to inform me that my assumption was stupidly mistaken. “The abbreviation most commonly used by those ‘inside the ghetto’ is SF,” he told me. The term sci fi “may not bother folks inside the field as much as it once did. But it is sort of our version of a racial slur, and since I tend toward the old school (my favorite works were all written prior to 1975), my sensitivities may be a bit more sensitive than most.” I’ve revised Andrew’s remark above to reflect its original form.

“Possible Military Dimensions to Iran’s Nuclear Programme”

That’s the title of the IAEA’s annex in its latest report about Iran’s nuclear program. The entire report can be read here, and the annex begins after page 11. After a very useful historical overview, the meat of the Annex is in Section C.  Paragraph 56 seems to indicate a program with military implications through at least 2010. A few highlights:

25. Under the AMAD Plan, Iran’s efforts to procure goods and services allegedly involved a number of ostensibly private companies which were able to provide cover for the real purpose of the procurements….

Read More

Should Israel Have Faith in Obama?

Jeffrey Goldberg started a firestorm more than a year ago with an article in the Atlantic that raised the possibility Israel was seriously considering a strike on Iran. While the Jewish state has held its fire since then, doubts about Tehran’s intention to develop a nuclear weapon have diminished, especially with the imminent release of a damning report from the International Atomic Energy Agency on the subject. Diplomacy has failed to deal with this threat for years, and there is little chance it will succeed now. That leaves the Israelis with two unpalatable choices: learn to live with a bomb in the hands of an Islamist and terrorist-supporting regime bent on their destruction or act on their own.

Israelis know the cost of a pre-emptive strike on Iran will be high, and the outcome of the struggle would be uncertain. But Goldberg believes there is hope. In a piece he wrote for Bloomberg News, he puts forward the astonishing thesis that President Obama is likely to order the use of force against Iran in order to save Israel. While the arguments that point to the need for the United States to take action are entirely sound, his confidence in Obama’s willingness to launch another military conflict as well as his eagerness to do so in order to remove an existential threat to Israel’s existence seems a trifle over-optimistic.

Read More

The IAEA Releases its Report on Iran

The IAEA has now released its latest report on Iran. The IAEA, in quite diplomatic language, finds the Iranian government in consistent contradiction to its own assurances and in violation of its obligations. A few key paragraphs from the body of the report (more later on the annexes):

7. Contrary to the relevant resolutions of the Board of Governors and the Security Council, Iran has not suspended its enrichment related activities in the following declared facilities, all of which are nevertheless under Agency safeguards.

Read More

Why is Anyone Surprised Qaddafi Hid Chemical Weapons?

A friend from my days in Iraqi Kurdistan, Thomas von der Osten-Sacken from the German NGO Wadi, points me to this interview with Ian Martin, special advisor for the United Nations in Libya. In the course of the interview, comes this background:

Martin noted progress concerning chemical weapons and nuclear material. Last week, Libyan officials said they discovered two new sites with chemical weapons that had not been declared by the Qaddafi regime when it vowed several years ago to stop pursuing non-conventional weapons. Officials also said they found about 7,000 drums of raw uranium.

Read More

Tim Tebow Still Under Fire for His Faith

The New York Times today wades into the debate about Denver Broncos quarterback Tim Tebow’s overt religiosity. Because Tebow is Christian, he has naturally inspired the anti-religious bigotry so prevalent in American popular culture. He kneels in prayer after touchdowns–a move that has received the nickname “Tebowing.” He is no stranger to controversy and, perhaps most provocative of all, he has been thus far resistant to the bullying masses of theophobic nihilists telling him to please shut up:

To his most fervent supporters — and there are many — Tebow was never just a quarterback. He was a champion of Christianity in shoulder pads, a wholesome, fearsome football player who loved God and touchdowns, in that order. If detractors found Tebow preachy, if he seemed too good to be true, he still won two national championships and a Heisman Trophy at the University of Florida, securing his legend as one of the greatest college players ever.

Drafted last year by the Broncos, he played sparingly his rookie season. Now, his struggles to adapt to the N.F.L. have changed the tenor of the debate around him, made it nastier, more personal, more intense. Supporters have reacted to criticism of Tebow as an indictment on religion, while detractors seem to delight in every wayward pass.

Read More

Legitimate Questions About Cain’s Accuser

In the court of public opinion, the burden of proof is extremely low. Herman Cain’s accuser, Sharon Bialek, claims he grabbed her inappropriately more than a decade ago – and her story is convincing. But is she a trustworthy source?

Information is already coming out that could potentially raise questions about her motives. For example, she has a history of financial troubles and legal accusations:

Read More

Optimistic or Pessimistic About America: Heather MacDonald

The following is from our November issue. Forty-one symposium contributors were asked to respond to the question: Are you optimistic or pessimistic about America’s future?

_____________

In Seoul, South Korea, thousands of people sequester themselves for months and years at a time in “Exam Village” to study for grueling professional tests. In China, tiger parents push their children relentlessly to succeed. American teens are definitely good at socializing.

As waves of Asian engineers and computer scientists lap at our shores, it’s hard not to despair at the educational apathy of many American students. Placing all the blame on schools for our listless academic performance ignores some unpleasant truths. Yes, the reign of progressive pedagogy means that American students spend much of their time in dopey “group learning,” allegedly creating their own knowledge (translation: talking about last weekend’s parties), rather than interacting with a teacher who demands attention and conveys hard facts. Yes, America’s fear of not being “inclusive” has redirected focus away from high achievers to the bottom rung. But if you dropped a Chinese student into a mediocre American classroom, my guess is that he would still learn, and he would certainly outlearn his peers, at least until he succumbed to the anti-intellectual student culture.

One of the reasons why educational effort is so fierce in the Far East and Southeast Asia, however, is that economic opportunities are more constricted there. Corruption and crippling red tape in many exam-driven cultures make it far harder to start a business, resulting in bottlenecks of talent. Americans take for granted the absence of endemic corruption in our political system, but it represents one of the great triumphs of Western civilization. However oppressive it can seem to comply with the Clean Water Act or the California Coastal Commission, at least an entrepreneur usually doesn’t have to pay off his local environmental inspector and other parasites to get a building permit. And while the thousands of regulations that pour out of federal agencies every year absorb senseless amounts of a businessman’s time, they are miracles of efficiency and minimalism compared with the Indian bureaucracy. Read More

A Year From Election Day, Obama Is In Precarious Position

The Washington Post recently published a story that summarizes things pretty well:

One year out from the 2012 election, President Obama faces the most difficult reelection environment of any White House incumbent in two decades, with economic woes at the center of the public’’s concerns, an electorate that is deeply pessimistic and sharply polarized, and growing questions about the president’’s capacity to lead.

Read More

So Much Optimism You Won’t Be Able to Stand It!

I delivered a Bradley Lecture at the American Enterprise Institute last night on the themes of my November COMMENTARY article, “The Case for Optimism.” It was an honor to be invited, and to be introduced by AEI’s president, Arthur C. Brooks, who is a contributor to the symposium accompanying my article. You can see excerpts from the speech here. And you can listen to an AEI podcast in which I elaborate still further on the matter here. If all this doesn’t make you optimistic, it might be time for some medication.

“Occupy Judaism’s” Reality Moment

In the weeks since grabbing headlines (and, it must unfortunately be said, hundreds of participants), organizers of the kol nidre service in solidarity with the Occupy Wall Street protests have tried to maintain momentum by organizing events around the other bounty of holidays on the Jewish calendar that follow in the weeks after Yom Kippur. From the beginning, they have tried to cast their efforts as “Occupy Judaism,” and the one thing that nonsensical neologism tells us is that whatever this thing is, it is clearly an attempt to tie the Jewish tradition to radical contemporary politics.

These Jews may have found themselves experiencing a passing moment of regret late last week when a stray tweet from the main Occupy Wall Street Twitter feed expressed its own “solidarity” with the latest “flotilla” attempt to break Israel’s blockade of Gaza. The tweet was quickly deleted, and the resulting tiff brought out the kind of condemnations from their erstwhile comrades that thrust them into the role of defending Israel (and themselves) online.

Read More

GOP, Romney Deserve Credit for Plans on Entitlement Reform

Our crushing, coming debt crisis cannot be averted unless health care costs are brought under control, and that cannot be done unless the basic structure of the Medicare program is reformed. “Based on his campaign so far,” I wrote in early September, “one senses that Mitt Romney has little heart for entitlement reform, especially Medicare.” For reasons ably laid out by Yuval Levin, David Brooks, and the Wall Street Journal editorial page, that concern has been allayed.

In a major speech on Friday, Romney proposed introducing a premium support system (meaning that seniors are given fixed-amount benefits that they can use to purchase an insurance plan). Less affluent beneficiaries would receive more than more affluent ones. Nothing would change for current seniors or those nearing retirement. And Romney would give seniors the option of staying in the traditional government-run fee-for-service insurance program, with this important caveat: If it costs the government more to provide that service than it costs private plans to offer their versions, the premiums charged by the government will be higher, and seniors will have to pay the difference to enroll in the traditional Medicare option.

Read More

The Myth of Israel’s Rightward Turn

Tonight, as Israel’s memorial day for slain Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin begins, is a good time to debunk a myth that has recently gained great currency: that Israel’s population has become increasingly right-wing, constituting a major obstacle to peace. This myth was most famously propounded by former President Bill Clinton (here and here ), but it also crops up frequently in academic discourse. A study published by the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies in September, for instance, declared that “Today Israel’s Jewish population is more nationalistic, religiously conservative, and hawkish on foreign policy and security affairs than that of even a generation ago, and it would be unrecognizable to Israel’s founders.”

Yet Rabin himself, the idol of those who propagate this myth, provides the best possible refutation of it. All you have to do is read his final speech to the Knesset, given one month before his death, to realize how far to the left Israel has traveled since then.

Read More

Obama and Sarkozy Gripe About Bibi

There were some legitimate questions about the veracity of this story last night, but Reuters has apparently confirmed it today. At the G-20 summit meeting earlier this month, a technical error reportedly broadcast a private conversation between President Obama and French President Nicolas Sarkozy to a roomful of reporters – including some undiplomatic carping about Benjamin Netanyahu:

“I cannot bear Netanyahu, he’s a liar,” Sarkozy told Obama, unaware that the microphones in their meeting room had been switched on, enabling reporters in a separate location to listen in to a simultaneous translation.

“You’re fed up with him, but I have to deal with him even more often than you,” Obama replied, according to the French interpreter.

Read More

The Death of Republican Outrage

The tipping point for Herman Cain was reached on Monday. It didn’t come when celebrity attorney Gloria Allred presented the fourth woman to accuse the Republican presidential candidate of sexual harassment and the first to go before the public. It came later in the day when William Bennett wrote a piece on the CNN website demanding Cain stop trying to evade the issue and instead fully address all the charges.

Bennett’s decision to speak out is significant not just because he is an influential Republican thinker and radio host but because he wrote the seminal account of the Bill Clinton sex scandal. Bennett’s The Death of Outrage: Bill Clinton and the Assault on American Ideals demolished the idea that public leaders’ “private misdeeds” had no impact on their ability to govern. He taught us that private misconduct had to be taken seriously and how Clinton’s cavalier approach to morals was unacceptable. What’s more, he also instructed an unwilling American public that a willingness to be judgmental about the immorality was a sign of a healthy democracy.

Read More