Commentary Magazine


Contentions

OWS Represents Modern Liberalism and the Democratic Party Under Obama

A new survey released by Public Policy Polling (PPP), a Democratic firm, shows the following:

The Occupy Wall Street movement is not wearing well with voters across the country. Only 33 percent now say that they are supportive of its goals, compared to 45 percent who say they oppose them. That represents an 11 point shift in the wrong direction for the movement’s support compared to a month ago when 35 percent of voters said they supported it and 36 percent were opposed. Most notably, independents have gone from supporting Occupy Wall Street’s goals 39/34, to opposing them 34/42.

As for the Tea Party, 42 percent say they support its goals (45 percent say they oppose). And when asked whether they have a higher opinion of the Tea Party or Occupy Wall Street movement, the Tea Party wins out 43-37, representing a flip from last month when Occupy Wall Street won out 40-37 on that question. Again the movement with independents is notable- from preferring Occupy Wall Street 43-34, to siding with the Tea Party 44-40.

None of this is surprising, and the hemorrhage is bound to continue. Despite the extraordinary media double standard when it comes to the Tea Party v. Occupy Wall Street (and its progeny), the essential nature of OWS – it’s violence, lawlessness, nihilism, anti-Semitism, and overall filth — is emerging. This is a movement the Democratic Party, starting with the president, has embraced, championed, and supported. Why the GOP has not done more to point this out – why it has not done more to draw attention to the Democratic Party’s strong support for such an ugly uprising – is a mystery to me.

There is a historic precedent to which one can look. We know, for example, the damage the Democratic Party’s embrace of transgressive social movements/the counterculture did in the late 1960s and early 1970s. This remains, even to this day, a liberal fault-line. If conservative lawmakers and political leaders were wise, they would do much more than they have to expose this movement that represents, in fundamental ways, the heart and soul of modern liberalism and the Democratic Party under Barack Obama.

 


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.