Commentary Magazine


Posts For: November 18, 2011

Occupy’s Moment of Silence for the White House Shooter

Here is a clip, courtesy of The Daily Caller, in which  a protester from Occupy San Diego told his fellow protesters, “I think we should have a moment of silence in solidarity for the person they said was from the Washington, D.C. Occupy. Maybe, why did he feel the need to shoot the White House window today? So I think we should have a moment in solidarity for the White House, and for the guy that shot at the White House today. I don’t know if you heard, but someone shot at the White House window today.”

Can you imagine the round-the-clock (negative) media coverage if (a) a person from a Tea Party rally was arrested for shooting at the White House and (b) if a Tea Party member from another city had asked for a “moment of silence in solidarity” with the alleged shooter? It would produce days of front page, above-the-fold coverage in the New York Times and spawn a thousand editorial and columns from liberals, to say nothing of providing MSNBC and CNN with several months worth of programming, hand-wringing, and sermonizing.
Read More

Shed No Tears for Iran’s Nuclear Scientists

Looking for a new cause focused on saving an endangered minority group? Then your search is over. According to Iran’s ambassador to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Iranian scientists working on the Islamist regime’s nuclear weapons program are now the moral equivalent of the Komodo Dragon or the Snow Leopard. The plea for the future happiness of those seeking to give the ayatollahs genocidal power should provide a cue for the proverbial world’s smallest violin.

Of course, the Iranian envoy is right. Iran’s nuclear scientists do have a bull’s eye on their backsides. One can only hope both American and Israeli agents are doing all in their power to make sure these hard-working agents of evil are having accidents at work or mishaps on their morning commutes. But though the plea for the scientists’ safety is the stuff of satire, Iran’s successful stalling tactics in international forums have left the West with no choice but to resort to covert action to halt Tehran’s push for nukes.

Read More

Not Left or Right, Just Crazy

If it wasn’t already apparent from the fact that he allegedly tried to assassinate the president, this video confirms Oscar Ortega-Hernandez has been an unhinged lunatic for quite some time now:

Read More

Mormon PR Campaign Fights Last Socially Acceptable Hate

The New York Times reports today the Mormon church is embarking on a major national advertising buy that seeks to disabuse Americans of the idea that members of their faith are “secretive” or “cultish.” The “I’m a Mormon” campaign, which will feature all sorts of all-American and ethnic types speaking of their faith, seems like straightforward public relations. The problem for the church is that in a year in which two Latter Day Saints are presidential candidates — Mitt Romney and Jon Huntsman — any such effort may be seen as smoothing the path for a Mormon to get to the White House.

But any criticism of the Mormon advertising push as a political ploy misunderstands the church’s dilemma. The very real possibility that Romney will be the Republican nominee may present more problems for Mormons than anything else. Given the enormous prejudice against adherents of that religion that still exists and the fact that it is one of the few forms of religious bias still considered socially acceptable to openly advocate, Mormons are bracing for a year in which the abuse they are already taking in popular culture will only increase. Under the circumstances, a push to reduce this form of hatred is not only good for the church and its members, but for society as a whole.

Read More

Gingrich and Romney Tied in NH

Mitt Romney’s support is holding steady, but conservative and Tea Party voters are fueling Newt Gingrich’s surge in New Hampshire, according to today’s Magellan Strategies poll:

If the election were held today, Romney would earn 29 percent of the vote and Gingrich would earn 27 percent. Texas Congressman Ron Paul continues to show resolve by earning 16 percent. Herman Cain gets 10 percent. No other candidate is in double digits. … 

A close look at the data shows Gingrich is actually leading Romney among certain important subgroups of the electorate. Among self-identified conservative voters, Gingrich beats Romney 34 percent-27 percent. Among self-identified Tea Party voters, he leads Romney 38 percent-21 percent.

Read More

Cain Goes on Media Lockdown

The Cain campaign has been trying to downplay the candidate’s embarrassing Libya gaffe earlier this week, saying it was simply the result of too little sleep. But stories like this don’t instill much confidence in that claim:

Candidate Herman Cain’s decision to skip a scheduled interview at the New Hampshire Union Leader became the buzz of state and national presidential politics Thursday.…

Read More

U.S. Should Bolster Civilians in Pakistan

I have no idea what the truth is regarding the notorious memo that Pakistan’s ambassador to Washington, Hussain Haqqani, allegedly sent to Admiral Mike Mullen, asking for U.S. help to prevent a military coup after the Osama bin Laden raid. The memo, whether it came from Haqqani or not, has landed him in hot water back home. What I do know is that the memo highlights what the Washington Post account rightly describes as ”the profound division between Pakistan’s powerful army and its civilian government.”

President Zardari and the civilians–including Ambassador Haqqani–are much more amenable to peaceful relations with the West than is the army whose Inter-Services Intelligence continues to fund and support the Haqqani Network and the Taliban, among other terrorist groups. Unfortunately, the army remains in de facto control of Pakistan’s foreign policy, regardless of the trappings of civilian rule. It is very much in America’s interest to bolster the civilians at the expense of the generals. The difficulty is finding a policy that can achieve that aim.

Read More

Optimistic or Pessimistic About America: R.R. Reno

The following is from our November issue. Forty-one symposium contributors were asked to respond to the question: Are you optimistic or pessimistic about America’s future?

_____________

Mark me down as an American optimist. True, we face many challenges: the fiscal crisis of the modern welfare state, the end of American military super-hegemony, an elite culture bent on dismantling the Judeo-Christian moral consensus. Add our present economic woes, which seem intractable, and only a naif can but conclude that we face real problems posing real threats. Nonetheless, I remain convinced that America will remain a vital, attractive, and immensely powerful nation in the coming decades.

The overwhelming majority of Americans—elite, middle class, and working class—are visceral patriots. We’re critical, we find fault, we anguish over our racist past, but the Declaration of Independence continues to express what we believe. This fact about America—the fundamental, deep, and rock-solid legitimacy not only of our system of government but also and more important of our common myths and civil religion—gives us an incalculable strength over and against any of our competitors on the global stage.

The American myth, moreover, has a remarkable—an unprecedented—absorptive power. It reabsorbed a defeated South after the Civil War. It absorbed and still absorbs waves of immigrants, even the children of ex-slaves, whose suffering and humiliation should have made them eternal enemies. A decade ago at my church, one of the elderly black members wept as he watched a documentary about the Tuskegee Airmen, black pilots in World War II who had to endure Jim Crow while training in the South. “How,” he said to me afterward, “could our country have been so unjust to those men?”

Our country! I defy anyone who understands the anguish of that man (who had himself grown up under Jim Crow!) to be anything other than an American optimist. Deficits, unemployment, new international threats, the fraying moral fabric of society—has any generation, any nation not faced these or similar challenges? A country doesn’t “solve” these sorts of problems but rather meets, ameliorates, and endures them. In these times of threat (and we certainly live in such a time), a nation is only as strong as its common culture, and ours is very strong, very strong indeed.

It’s easy to miss the forest for the trees. My elderly friend at church is a rock-ribbed Democrat, and I have little doubt that he disagrees with me about how to solve our present fiscal woes. Other friends think me a religious fanatic in my opposition to same-sex marriage, easy divorce, and abortion on demand. Still others have dreamy ideas about global conflict, the United Nations, and international law. They take the Rodney King approach to national defense: “Why can’t we all just get along?”

Their views and those of others on the left are wrongheaded, and if they control our national future we’ll suffer accordingly. But a nation hobbled by its own stupidity is almost inevitable. What makes us great is the fact that underneath our political and moral debates we have a healthy, robust common culture, a backstop, a bottom line.

Osama bin Laden was stupid enough to imagine that America’s all too real and obvious corruptions—our wanton hedonism, our empty materialism, our reality-TV political culture, our supine, bleating efforts to placate enemies with our vast treasure rather than meet them with military resolve—constitute our national essence. He was very wrong. As we face and fight these corruptions, let’s not make the same mistake.

_____________

R.R. Reno is editor of First Things.

Gingrich Promoted “Death Panels” in ‘09

Coming on the heels of reports that Newt Gingrich received nearly $2 million in consulting fees from Freddie Mac, the New York Times reports today that the former Speaker also consulted for a health care company that supported “death panels” – and Gingrich even publicly promoted the policy:

Writing on the website of the Washington Post, Mr. Gingrich praised Gundersen Lutheran Health System of LaCrosse, Wis., for its successful efforts to persuade most patients to have “advance directives,” saying that if Medicare had followed Gundersen’s lead on end-of-life care and other practices, it would “save more than $33 billion a year.”

But within weeks, Mr. Gingrich would find himself on the wrong end of what some Republicans labeled the “death panel” issue.

Read More

Panetta Seems More Interested in Stopping Israel Than Iran

Last week, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta did Iran a favor by publicly pouring cold water on the possibility of the United States using force to prevent Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons. In doing so, the Pentagon chief removed whatever lingering doubts the ayatollahs may have had about America’s long-term intentions. This peace of mind will, no doubt, spur them to redouble their efforts to go nuclear. But in case they missed that message, the secretary doubled down on it yesterday. According to Reuters, Panetta told reporters (who had accompanied him on a trip to Halifax, Canada, where he will attend a security forum and meet with Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak), the same points he mentioned last week about the unintended consequences of an attack on Iran and how it would only delay their nuclear program. He added that such hostilities would also hurt the world economy.

While there are good reasons to be cautious about embarking on a military campaign against Iran, Panetta’s concerns are overblown. But more importantly, with this second statement in a week against an attack, Panetta’s priorities on the issue are becoming clear. At this point, he’s not so much trying to stop Iran from going nuclear as he is doing all he can to make sure Israel doesn’t attack them.

Read More

Consequences of U.S. Troop Withdrawals

The Wall Street Journal  highlights today one of many disputes that could mar the future of Iraq once American forces leave. In this case it’s the Arab-Kurd dispute, with each side claiming jurisdiction over the oil-rich north city of Kirkuk. This has played out with the mainly Kurdish local police trying to refuse entry to Iraqi army officers coming to claim a U.S. airbase. Expect more such disputes in the future as U.S. troops are totally withdrawn and their peacekeeping role ends. The article quotes Kirkuk’s governor as noting that the Arabs and Kurds “are together while the U.S. forces are here and they will be together if nothing happens. But God forbid if the situation changes you will probably see them split apart, going their own way.”

A similar warning was sounded about Afghanistan by its well-regarded former Interior Minister, Mohammad Hanif Atmar, who was fired by Hamid Karzai and is now an opposition politician. He told a Washington forum that “Afghanistan will likely plunge into civil and regional war if the United States does not leave a residual force of 20,000 to 30,000 troops in the country after 2014, along with significant economic aid.”

Read More

Zuccotti Bark, No Bite

Occupy Wall Street’s day of action was a bust. Turnout fell far short of the anticipated tens of thousands, and the headlines made were less than triumphant. Reuters: “Authorities foil NY protest bid to shut Wall Street.” The AP: “Police Clashes Mar Occupy Wall Street Protests.” Bloomberg: “Protesters Blocked in Attempt to Disrupt NYSE.”

The day was a bust because support for socialism is puny in the United States. American liberals will click “like” or give empty “support” to something vague like the “authentic expression of frustration out there.” But a day of activism devoted to demanding more government? Wrong country. This is the place where last year hundreds of thousands of citizens—not a few sad parks-full—got together to tell the government to butt out of their lives and spend less on Americans.

Read More

UNESCO Advocates Press Censorship–and Wants the U.S. to Pay for It

Pursuant to Max’s post yesterday, I’d like to weigh in on UNESCO’s latest effort to persuade Washington to restore the funding it lost when it recognized “Palestine”: Quite aside from UNESCO’s anti-Israel animus (see, for instance,  its erasure of Jewish history by declaring millennia-old Jewish holy sites to be Islamic), America shouldn’t be financing an “Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization” that thinks education, science and culture are best promoted by suppressing freedom of the press. The following Haaretz report is not a joke:

Israel’s ambassador to UNESCO didn’t know whether to laugh or cry when a senior official at the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization called him in for a tongue-lashing on Wednesday [November 9]. The reason? A cartoon published in Haaretz.

The November 4 cartoon, a riff on the government’s anger at UNESCO’s decision to accept Palestine as a full member, showed Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak sending an air force squadron to attack Iran, with Netanyahu ordering, “And on your way back, you’re gonna hit the UNESCO office in Ramallah!”

When he met with Eric Falt, UNESCO’s assistant director general for external relations and public information, Ambassador Nimrod Barkan was stunned to be handed a copy of this cartoon and an official letter of protest from UNESCO’s Director General Irina Bokova. Falt told Barkan the cartoon constituted incitement.

“A cartoon like this endangers the lives of unarmed diplomats, and you have an obligation to protect them,” Falt said, according to an Israeli source. “We understand that there is freedom of the press in Israel, but the government must prevent attacks on UNESCO.”

Barkan tried to explain that in Israel, the government doesn’t control the media, but to no avail. He might have added that if it did, Haaretz – a virulent critic of the Netanyahu government – would have been closed long since. He might further have added that Falt misunderstood the cartoon, which, far from encouraging attacks on UNESCO, was meant to heap scorn on Jerusalem’s anger at the organization: Haaretz, unlike the government, has largely supported the Palestinians’ UN bid, and it reliably opposes any and all Israeli military action. In other words, Falt’s censorship campaign was ironically aimed at one of the UN’s very few champions in Israel.

Read More

Optimistic or Pessimistic About America: Herbert I. London

The following is from our November issue. Forty-one symposium contributors were asked to respond to the question: Are you optimistic or pessimistic about America’s future?

_____________

McLandburgh Wilson once observed, “Twixt the optimist and the pessimist, the difference is droll: the optimist sees the doughnut, but the pessimist sees the hole.” Since a diet of doughnuts can be deadly, I describe myself as a guarded optimist. The adjective saves me from the charge of being a Pollyanna. As I see it, there are two reasons for hopefulness.

One, pessimism is not a policy prescription. If the world were going to hell in a handbasket, most people would, ostrich-like, put their head in the sand and yield to forces they cannot control. My fear is that pessimism can easily morph into despair.

Two, empirical evidence provides some justification for guarded optimism. 1979 was a terrible year politically: the Iranian revolution deposed the shah and set loose Islamic fanaticism; the Soviet military invaded Afghanistan; the Grand Mosque in Mecca was captured by Wahhabis who were able to extract extortion payments from the House of Saud; the United States was living through a period of double-digit inflation; and the nation was saddled with a bungling president whose only response to the Soviet military action was boycotting the Olympics. Read More