Commentary Magazine


Contentions

America Needs a Proactive, Not Reactive Foreign Policy

There has been much discussion at “Contentions” and elsewhere about the Obama administration’s foreign policy, as well as the positions put forward by the Republican contenders. Alas, if there is one common characteristic, it is that almost all the debate centers around reacting to events rather than enunciating a proactive American strategy.

The Obama administration has been reacting on the fly to the Arab Spring, and the embarrassing flip-flops by some of the Republican candidates have done the quality of the debate a disservice. While I am certainly critical of some of Obama’s naïveté regarding American adversaries and believe that his abandonment of Iraq represents a devastating own-goal, it would behoove any successor to recognize that first and foremost the problems we face come from adversaries abroad rather than their predecessors.

Being secretary of state shouldn’t simply be about the travel and the perks, but about the strategy. Ask any diplomat or Pentagon official, and they will tell you their time is spent dealing with the next contingency, crisis, or deadline. Perhaps the reason for the weakness of American policy is because too few officials have their eyes on the big picture. There is no coherent policy or comprehensive strategy, one that interweaves the diplomatic, informational, military, and economic components which are essential to success.

Perhaps it is time for the Republicans not only to play backseat driver, but to outline a much more comprehensive vision. For example, they might want to define where they want the Arab states to be in two years, and then work backwards to construct a U.S. strategy which might produce the desired results. Likewise, they might ask the same question about Iran’s nuclear defiance. Set the goal and the timeline, and then work in reverse to craft a proactive strategy.

Pundits like Tom Friedman constantly praise China. While I would never, like Friedman, so glibly discount China’s gross violations of human rights and its dictatorship, there is no question that China has defined a strategy which it works toward. Vladimir Putin also has in Russia, and both countries have advanced their strategic positions because of it. Perhaps it’s time the United States again lead, rather than lazily react and follow.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.