Commentary Magazine


Posts For: December 14, 2011

Thomas Friedman and the New Anti-Semitism-Part Two

As I wrote earlier, the latest column from the New York Times’ Thomas Friedman is more than just his usual rant about Republicans or his particular bête noire: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. By alleging that the support of American politicians, from the Republican presidential candidates to the bipartisan coalition in Congress, has been “bought and paid for by the Israeli lobby,” he has slid down the slippery slope from legitimate criticism of Israeli policies and the arguments of the state’s friends to a position indistinguishable from the anti-Semitic smears of Israel Lobby authors Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer.

But Friedman doesn’t stop there. He goes on to enumerate various Israeli sins that should, he thinks, cause American Jews and our leaders to distance themselves from the Jewish state. While Israel, like the United States and any other place on earth is not utopia, neither is its democracy or its basic decency in question. To make such an assertion is not, as Friedman would have it, an expression of friendly concern, but a blow intended to delegitimize both the country and those who are devoted to its survival.

Read More

Thomas Friedman and the New Anti-Semitism-Part One

Though the New York Times’ Thomas Friedman invariably characterizes himself as a friend of Israel, his most recent column illustrates the slippery slope along which critics of the Jewish state invariably slide as they attempt to shout down those with whom they disagree.

In an effort to simultaneously bash Republican supporters of Israel as well as the Israeli government, his frustration with Israel’s enduring popularity has led him to engage in smears more typically associated with fringe intellectuals such as Israel Lobby authors Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer. It’s not just that Friedman disdains Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney’s belief in the U.S.-Israel alliance, but that in order to justify his contempt, he finds himself having to paint Israel as being intrinsically unworthy of any support.

Read More

Paul Ryan Slams Gingrich on Leadership

It’s been months since Newt Gingrich’s “right-wing social engineering” controversy died down, but he’s back to clashing with Rep. Paul Ryan once again. The trouble started when Gingrich made the following comments on Coffee & Markets last week, while discussing Medicare reform:

If there’s a program that is very, very unpopular, should Republicans impose it? And my answer’s no. Reagan ran to be a popular president, not to maximize suicide. I think conservatives have got to understand, you govern over the long run by having the American people think you’re doing a good job and think you’re doing what they want. Now the question is, how do you have creative leadership that achieves the right values in a popular way?

Read More

Egypt’s Spiteful Boycott of Israel

Egypt’s interim prime minister literally broke into tears over the weekend trying to convey just how bad the country’s economy has gotten. Not a small part of that economic crisis is grounded in Egypt’s spiteful economic campaign against Israel, which has seen Cairo sever most of its industrial and agriculture ties with Jerusalem:

[Israeli] officials, sounding cool, noted that there were precious few relations left to break, since Egypt had long been severing ties to punish Israel for refusing to yield to the Palestinians in the peace process. Egyptian-Israeli agricultural schemes long ago ground to a halt. Factories with Israeli links that had profited from tariff-free exports to the United States have shut. Since Egypt’s revolution began in January, Israeli tourists have virtually stopped coming. This year Egyptian militants have blown up a pipeline pumping Egyptian gas to Israel nine times.

Read More

Brzezinski’s Bizarro World

In today’s Wall Street Journal, former National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski unspools a crystalline specimen of logical contradiction. Writing about America’s China policy and U.S. grand strategy in general, Brzezinski first admonishes:

“To have the credibility and the capacity to act effectively in both the western and eastern parts of Eurasia, the U.S. must show the world that it has the will to reform itself at home. Americans must place greater emphasis on the more subtle dimensions of national power, such as innovation and education.”

Read More

Obama: Please Give My Drone Back

I am agnostic on whether President Obama should have launched a military mission to recover or destroy an RQ-170 Stealth drone that went down in Iran. Much depends on the tactical intelligence picture which no outsider can judge accurately: How far away from substantial Iranian military forces did the drone crash? What were the odds of getting an extraction mission in and out undetected? Could an airstrike be launched without convincing the Iranians that a major war was breaking out? Etc. I don’t know the right answer to those questions, so I will withhold judgment.

I am pretty sure, however, that the president’s request the Iranians return the drone was dopey and humiliating. Especially because there was no “or else” appended to the demand.

Read More

The “Do-Nothing” Senate?

All of President Obama’s denunciations of the “do-nothing Congress” and fiery appeals for lawmakers to “pass this jobs bill now” may be blowing up in his face. Yesterday, the House approved one of the key pieces of Obama’s jobs bill, but also inserted a provision that would greenlight the Keystone XL pipeline construction. Now it’s the Democrat-controlled Senate and President Obama (who vowed to veto the legislation if its passed) standing in the way of the jobs bill:

Defiant Republicans pushed legislation through the House Tuesday night that would keep alive Social Security payroll tax cuts for some 160 million Americans at President Barack Obama’s request — but also would require construction of a Canada-to-Texas oil pipeline that has sparked a White House veto threat.

Read More

Tom Friedman’s 14-Year-Old Losing Streak

Yesterday’s New York Times diatribe by Thomas Friedman is being blasted for declaring that the United States Congress is “bought and paid for by the Israel lobby.” Friedman contrasted the strong support that Israel receives from the American political establishment with what he insisted is declining support from American Jewry, the latter being the result of Israeli domestic and foreign policy.

And while it’s important to underline the deep unseemliness of Friedman’s implicit dual loyalty canard – a smear that has become distressingly commonplace in left-wing anti-Israel discourse – let’s also take some time to appreciate the near-comical fidelity with which he toes the “Jews are abandoning Israel” line. Here is Friedman yesterday:

Read More

Paul Could Burst the Gingrich Bubble

The exchange of barbs between Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney during the last few days has understandably garnered most of the attention in the Republican presidential race. It’s not clear whether or not Romney’s attacks on Gingrich are going to hurt the former Speaker. Nor do we know yet whether Gingrich’s ill-conceived blast at Romney’s business career in which he seemed to take a shot at capitalism as much as at Bain Capital will damage either of them. But perhaps instead of worrying so much about Romney, Gingrich needs to pay more attention to the real threat to his presidential ambitions: Ron Paul.

That is not to say the libertarian is in any danger of becoming the Republican nominee. He’s not. Paul represents a marginal extremist faction and has no chance outside of a caucus state like Iowa, where he might win a tiny plurality in a multi-candidate race. But the danger to Gingrich is that a victory by Paul, who is now placing second in most polls of Iowa Republican caucus-goers, would put an end to the Speaker’s surge and give the faltering Romney new hope.

Read More

Anti-Christian Bigotry is Still Bigotry

Rabbi Joshua Hammerman’s article on Tim Tebow is making the rounds today–and not in a good way. The disturbing article, a vicious diatribe against American Christians, has offended not only its Christian targets but also American Jews who have worked hard to produce the gains in Jewish-Christian relations that such attacks threaten to undermine. Here is the most offensive paragraph (which the editors, since this post went up, finally deleted, though the rest of the offensive column remains):

If Tebow wins the Super Bowl, against all odds, it will buoy his faithful, and emboldened faithful can do insane things, like burning mosques, bashing gays and indiscriminately banishing immigrants.  While America has become more inclusive since Jerry Falwell’s first political forays, a Tebow triumph could set those efforts back considerably.

Read More

Gingrich Sends Message: Elections Aren’t a Referendum on Theology

According to press reports, the new political director for Newt Gingrich’s Iowa campaign “agreed to step away” from the job after it came to light he had said some evangelicals believe God would reject Mitt Romney because of his Mormonism.

Craig Bergman during a focus group last Wednesday with the Iowa Republican and McClatchy newspapers said he thought Romney’s religion eventually would cost him votes. “A lot of the evangelicals believe God would give us four more years of Obama just for the opportunity to expose the cult of Mormon,” Bergman said during the focus group, according to the Iowa Republican. “There’s [sic] a thousand pastors ready to do that.”

Read More

Gingrich Faces Problems in Iowa

These are the perils of trying to build an organization in Iowa just weeks before the caucuses: Newt Gingrich’s brand new Iowa political director just got booted from the campaign after referring to Mormonism as a “cult”:

Craig Bergman during a focus group on Wednesday with the Iowa Republican and McClatchy newspapers said he thinks Romney’s religion will eventually cost him votes.

“A lot of the evangelicals believe God would give us four more years of Obama just for the opportunity to expose the cult of Mormon,” Bergman said during the focus group, according to the Iowa Republican. “There’s [sic] a thousand pastors ready to do that.”

Read More

Obama Punts on Egyptian Islamists

Today marks the beginning of the second round of Egypt’s parliamentary elections. You’ll recall how the first round, which occurred in relatively liberal urban centers, saw the youth vote “decimated” in an Islamist landslide. You’ll also recall how this wasn’t supposed to happen, and how during the Arab Spring Western foreign policy analysts generated an endless array of excuses as to why.

And yet the people who are winning are the same people who are holding rallies, in the full glare of an international spotlight, vowing to kill all the Jews. After they’re done eliminating Middle East Jewry – or, alternatively, in parallel – they also intend to force women out of public life and to transform the Library of Alexandria into a mosque. The final campaign is proof that their hatred of Jews and women aside, Egypt’s Islamists have a poignant appreciation for metaphor.

Read More

“See No Evil” Attitude Toward Iraq

There is a sharp counterpoint to the happy talk between President Obama and Iraqi Prime Minister al-Malaki at the White House. It comes from Deputy Prime Minister Salah al-Mutlaq, a leading Sunni politician who was part of the Iraqiya party which won more votes than al-Maliki’s Dawa party in the last election. In an interview with CNN, he warns that al-Maliki is becoming a new “dictator”:

“The political process is going in a very wrong direction, going toward a dictatorship,” he said. “People are not going to accept that, and most likely they are going to ask for the division of the country. And this is going to be a disaster. Dividing the country isn’t going to be smooth, because dividing the country is going to be a war before that and a war after that”….

He said U.S. officials, who brokered the power-sharing deal, either “don’t know anything in Iraq and they don’t know what is happening in Iraq, or because they don’t want to admit the reality in Iraq, the failure in Iraq, the failure of this political process that they set in Iraq.”

Read More

Sununu? What is Romney Thinking?

I tend to think that the role endorsements and surrogates play in a campaign is overstated. But both Marc Thiessen and Tony Blankley raise a good question: What on earth is the Romney campaign thinking in using former New Hampshire Governor John Sununu as its lead attacker against Newt Gingrich? After all, Sununu – who was chief of staff to President George H.W. Bush — played a key role in convincing Bush to break his “no new taxes” pledge and, even more  significantly, championed David Souter for the Supreme Court. For many conservatives, these are discrediting acts. And Gingrich, to his credit, warned the Bush 41 administration about the damage Bush’s tax reversal would cause.

Blankley quotes Marlin Fitzwater, who was the presidential press secretary at the time and no fan of Gingrich’s, as saying, “As it turned out, one of the few people on the Republican team who understood this trap (the Democrats demanded Bush raise taxes as the political price to reduce the deficit) was Newt Gingrich. … Newt had … recommended a different course of action: Abandon the budget negotiations (with the Democrats), keep the tax pledge, insist that Congress cut spending, and make a political fight out of it. It’s clear now that we should have followed his advice.”

Read More

Romney in ‘02: “My Views Are Progressive”

Mitt Romney critics are jumping on this unearthed 2002 campaign footage as proof of…what? That Romney harbors liberal views (beyond the ones we already know about)? That he panders to voters (beyond the examples we already have)?

I’m not sure this video is really as explosive as some think it is, but take a look for yourself:

Read More

Abandoning Realism to Preserve It

Science fiction has a surprisingly close relationship with realism, Kingsley Amis says in New Maps of Hell (1960). In distinguishing it from fantasy (with which it is often associated and confused), Amis points out that “while science fiction . . . maintains a respect for fact or presumptive fact, fantasy makes a point of flouting these. . . .”

Hence its unexpected didacticism: science fiction carries present trends to their logical (and lesson-serving) conclusion. Dystopias like Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go, Linda Chavez’s recommendation for the holiday season, teach a lesson about current realities by the simple method of showing what might happen if they are not altered or corrected.

“[A] difference which makes the difference between abandoning verisimilitude and trying to preserve it seems to me to make all the difference,” Amis says. And something like this may go far to explain Michael Weingrad’s claim that “Judaism is a science fiction religion” (while, by contrast, “Christianity is a fantasy religion”). In other words, Judaism is a religion that preserves verisimilitude, while Christianity is a religion that abandons it.

Thus even Jewish fiction that seems upon first reflection to be fantasy turn out not to be. Take Steve Stern’s marvelous The Frozen Rabbi (2010), for example. Reissued in paperback by Algonquin earlier this year, the novel has a fantastical premise. A 19th-century Polish tzaddik, lost in a meditative trance while a storm rages around him (“his soul sat in bliss among the archons studying Torah”), does not notice that the pond on whose bank he lies has begun to rise, “inundating his legs to the waist, creeping over his chest and chin and ultimately submerging his hoary head.”

The rebbe remains underwater, “continu[ing] his submarine meditations,” while autumn turns to winter. The pond freezes over; the rebbe is discovered embedded in the ice, “apparently intact even if frozen stiff,” and carted back to the village. The frozen rabbi is stored in an ice house for a few years, and then is passed down like a holy relic from generation to generation. He is transported across Europe and eventually to America, where he ends up in an ice chest in a Memphis basement. One day in 1999 a thunderstorm causes an electrical outage and the rabbi thaws out to find himself at the turn of centuries.

Surely this is the Jewish fantasy (if not exactly the Jewish Narnia) that Weingrad had written in the Jewish Review of Books is nowhere to be found. But no. Stern’s novel respects fact and preserves verisimilitude. Indeed, the novel’s satirical purpose is to comment upon and poke fun at the “Gan Eydn” (Garden of Eden, paradise) that Rabbi Eliezer ben Zephyr believes himself to have awakened to in postmodern America. Stern must have his facts straight for his satire to work. His primary attention is on the social and linguistic detail of contemporary Memphis and its environs. The fantastical premise is simply a device for bringing them into clearer, even exaggerated focus.

Stern is much closer to Kafka than to Lewis, Tolkien, Rowling, and George R. R. Martin. Kafka invented a special genre of Jewish SF (perhaps more speculative fiction than science fiction). The first sentence of The Metamorphosis, when Gregor Samsa awakens from uneasy dreams to find himself transformed into a giant beetle, launched the new genre. Only in the first sentence — only in its initial premise — does Kafka’s story dispenses with realism. Otherwise it is faithful to the factual and the possible.

The Frozen Rabbi is just one example of Jewish fiction of fantastical premise, which momentarily abandons verisimilitude for the sake of ultimately preserving it. Joseph Skibell’s wonderful A Curable Romantic (released in paper last month) premises that one of the most famous Viennese psychoanalytic patients was not suffering from the sexual hysteria that Freud diagnosed, but from a talkative lovesick dybbuk. And John J. Clayton’s Mitzvah Man, the best Jewish novel of 2011 (to which my January fiction chronicle will largely be devoted), starts from the premise that a modern man who sets out to obey God’s commandments might just (who knows?) be capable of performing miracles. If they are miracles, though, they are miracles that occur in recognizable surroundings to recognizable human beings.

Even at its most fantastical, Jewish fiction is a fiction of realism.

The Truth About Palestinian Immigration

Writing in Israel Hayom yesterday, Yoram Ettinger supported Newt Gingrich’s statement that Palestinians are an “invented” people by offering statistics to show that far from having lived in the Holy Land for millennia, most Palestinians descend from immigrants who came from throughout the Muslim world between 1845 and 1947. Simon Sebag Montefiore provides similar data in his new book, Jerusalem: The Biography, as a New York Times reviewer noted: From 1919-38, for instance, 343,000 Jews and 419,000 Arabs immigrated to the area, meaning Arab Johnny-come-latelies significantly outnumbered the Jewish ones.

One might ask why this should matter: Regardless of when either Jews or Palestinians arrived, millions of both live east of the Jordan River today, and that’s the reality policymakers must deal with. But in truth, it matters greatly – because Western support for Palestinian negotiating positions stems largely from the widespread view that Palestinians are an indigenous people whose land was stolen by Western (Jewish) interlopers.

Read More

Harry Potter and the Rabbi

In the Introduction to Listening to God (Toby Press, 500 pages), Rabbi Shlomo Riskin starts off by quoting the Kotzker Rebbe, a notoriously severe Hasidic thinker, then the Bible, followed by another Hasidic tzaddik and the great biblical commentators Rashi and Nahmanides. After this roster of unsurprising Jewish sources comes an entirely unanticipated reference:

I agree with Harry Potter’s Professor Dumbledore that it is the decisions we make, rather than the intellectual gifts with which we are endowed, that are ultimately the measure of the human being and the life that one lives.

Riskin is a name to conjure with in Modern Orthodoxy. Founder of the Lincoln Square Synagogue, he is famous for his outreach to lapsed Jews, winning back many souls for religious Judaism. Listening to God is a collection of inspirational stories very much in the ethos of outreach and “return.” The tone is consistently one of spiritual uplift. Whether Harry Potter belongs in the same category is a question that can only be answered by readers more knowledgeable than I about the books. The “elective affinity,” though, suggests something deeper than cultural fashion and influence.