Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Obama Punts on Egyptian Islamists

Today marks the beginning of the second round of Egypt’s parliamentary elections. You’ll recall how the first round, which occurred in relatively liberal urban centers, saw the youth vote “decimated” in an Islamist landslide. You’ll also recall how this wasn’t supposed to happen, and how during the Arab Spring Western foreign policy analysts generated an endless array of excuses as to why.

And yet the people who are winning are the same people who are holding rallies, in the full glare of an international spotlight, vowing to kill all the Jews. After they’re done eliminating Middle East Jewry – or, alternatively, in parallel – they also intend to force women out of public life and to transform the Library of Alexandria into a mosque. The final campaign is proof that their hatred of Jews and women aside, Egypt’s Islamists have a poignant appreciation for metaphor.

Radical parties will do even better in the current round of voting, which occurs in mostly rural areas where their ideology disproportionately resonates and where they are disproportionately well-organized.

And now here’s your link to a recent Associated Press article on how the Obama administration pushed for “timely elections” despite knowing that “they risked leaving the U.S. with less influence and fewer friends in the Middle East.” The story is in line with administration statements acknowledging/ignoring the same risk calculus in November. It’s an crystallization of the overall sanguine attitude with which the administration has greeted the Islamist takeover of Egypt, an approach that even included providing election training to Islamist parties.

Just so everyone’s on the same explicit page: it’s not a matter of the Obama administration mistakenly concluding – perhaps via some kind of pseudo-sophisticated reasoning about projecting neutrality – that their policies will promote American leadership and influence. They’ve admitted that the exact opposite will happen. Apparently promoting U.S. interests isn’t the number one priority of the U.S. government any more.

On the plus side, the New York Times basically assured everyone last month that getting rid of the military will solve Egypt’s political dysfunction. So, no worries.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.