Commentary Magazine


Posts For: December 27, 2011

Top 10 Literary News Stories of 2011

The year 2011 was another bad year for literature. Few distinguished books were published, book sales declined from month to month, booksellers shuttered their stores, and literary prizes (with a couple of exceptions) went to mediocrities. Before steeling ourselves for the inevitable disappointments of 2012, let’s review the top literary stories of the year:

#10. The Swedish poet Tomas Tranströmer was awarded the Nobel Prize in literature, an honor bestowed annually upon one of the world’s celebrated second-rate writers with agreeable politics.

#9. Little, Brown recalled 6,500 copies of the spy thriller Assassin of Secrets and turned them into pulp after revelations that Q. R. Markham had plagiarized much of the book. Protesting that he was suffering from an addiction, Markham advanced the Disease Theory of Plagiarism — his first original contribution to literature.

#8. “Why Chinese Mothers Are Superior,” an excerpt from Amy Chua’s memoir Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother, provoked nearly 9,000 comments at the Wall Street Journal and set off an international debate about child-rearing methods.

#7. The American novelist Philip Roth was awarded the International Man Booker Prize, igniting a controversy when the feminist publisher Carmen Callil walked off the prize jury, sniffing that she did not “rate him as a writer at all.”

#6. Jennifer Egan won the Pulitzer Prize in fiction for A Visit from the Goon Squad — a rare example of the prize’s going to the best book of the year (or nearly the best). HBO promptly announced plans to adapt the novel into a TV series.

#5. Judge Denny Chin, a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, rejected the $125 million settlement negotiated between Google and the Authors Guild, concluding that it “would give Google a significant advantage over competitors, rewarding it for engaging in wholesale copying of copyrighted works without permission. . . .” By the end of the year, Google was seeking to kick the Authors Guild out of the copyright suit.

#4. Literary history was made at the National Book Awards, at least according to the Washington Post fiction critic Ron Charles, when Nikky Finney and Jesmyn Ward, “[t]wo spectacularly powerful African American women,” were awarded the prizes in poetry and fiction respectively.

#3. After filing for bankruptcy in February, Borders was forced to close its last remaining stores and liquidate its inventory in July after failing to receive a single offer to save the bookstore chain.

#2. Amazon.com announced that, for the first time, sales of Kindle-ready ebooks on its website surpassed sales of hardback and paperback books combined.

#1. The courageous and contrarian essayist Christopher Hitchens, who taught an entire generation of young writers the virtue of truth-seeking in literature, died after an 18-month battle with esophageal cancer.

Hitchens’s was not the only important literary voice to be silenced in 2011. Other deaths in the literary world included:

Joe Gores, American mystery novelist (January 10).
Wilfrid Sheed, Anglo-American novelist (January 19).
Reynolds Price, American novelist (January 20).
Édouard Glissant, Martinican poet and novelist (February 3).
Bo Carpelan, Finnish poet and novelist (February 11).
Arnošt Lustig, Czech writer of Holocaust novels (February 26) [h/t: Erika Dreifus].
John Haines, American poet (March 2).
L. J. Davis, American novelist (April 6).
Stephen Watson, South African poet and critic (April 10).
Patrick Cullinan, South African poet (April 14).
Jeanne Leiby, editor of the Southern Review (April 19).
Gonzalo Rojas, Chilean poet (April 25).
Joanna Russ, American science fiction novelist and feminist (April 29).
Yannis Varveris, Greek poet (May 25).
Josephine Hart, British novelist (June 2).
Robert Kroetsch, Canadian novelist and co-founder of the journal Boundary 2.
Ágota Kristóf, Hungarian-Swiss novelist (July 27).
Eliseo Alberto, anti-Castro Cuban novelist and essayist (July 31).
Stan Barstow, British novelist (August 1).
David Holbrook, British literary scholar (August 11).
Samuel Menashe, American poet (August 22).
Susan Fromberg Schaeffer, American novelist (August 26).
Michael Hart, founder of Project Gutenberg (September 6).
Ida Fink, Polish writer of Holocaust fiction (September 27).
Hella S. Haasse, Dutch novelist (September 29).
Gerald Shapiro, American Jewish story writer and editor (October 15).
John Morton Blum, American historian (October 17).
Piri Thomas, American memoirist (October 17).
Allen Mandelbaum, American translator of Virgil and Dante (October 27).
Morris Phillipson, American novelist and director of the University of Chicago Press (November 3).
Tomás Segovia, Spanish exile poet (November 7).
F. Springer (pseudonym of Carel Jan Schneider), Dutch novelist (November 7).
Peter Reading, British poet (November 17).
Daniel Sada, Mexican poet (November 18).
Ruth Stone, American poet (November 19).
Christa Wolf, German novelist and critic (December 1).
Christopher Logue, British poet (December 2).
Russell Hoban, American novelist (December 13).
Joe Simon, American comic-book writer (December 14).
Paula Hyman, American Jewish historian (December 15).

Redeeming a Still Broken Glass

The question of whether a person who is a known liar is eligible to become a member of the bar is one of these dilemmas that seem to be as much the fodder for standup comedy as it is a serious philosophical inquiry. Since so many licensed lawyers are known to lie or at least aggressively shade and chip away at the truth for a living, depriving someone who has already done the same thing in another profession of a chance to join the ranks of legal eagles seems to be the height of irony, if not a bit unfair. Nevertheless, one must applaud the scruples of those solons that judged Stephen Glass, who gained infamy for spinning fictional yarns and passing them off as factual reporting in national magazines, as unworthy to be a member of the California bar.

That ruling, an appeal of which will soon be decided by the California State Supreme Court, is the subject of a piece by New York Times op-ed columnist Joe Nocera today in which the author presents the famous fabulist Glass as a classic case of redemption. Nocera portrays the would-be lawyer as the second coming of George Washington and Abe Lincoln. Nowadays, Nocera tells us without tongue in cheek that he won’t even “tell even the tiniest of white lies”). But the column, like Glass’s attempt to join the bar, is both unconvincing and unseemly.

Read More

How Inevitable is Romney?

With just one week to go before the Iowa caucuses, uncertainty is the word that can best describe the situation in the Republican presidential race. The polls have been all over the place in recent months as one candidate after another took turns trying on the mantle of frontrunner. Newt Gingrich’s moment appears to have come and gone. The affections of the social conservative and Tea Party wings of the party are split between three candidates who can’t seem to shake each other. Libertarian Ron Paul is making a splash — largely on the strength on non-GOP voters — but revelations about his extremist connections and hate-filled newsletters may limit his chances at a first place finish. Which leaves us with the same guy whom the media anointed as the frontrunner back in the spring as the most likely to be nominated: Mitt Romney.

New York Times statistical analyst Nate Silver asks today whether it is possible for Romney to lose. The answer is yes he can, but the odds still favor him for the same reason they have the past few months: none of the alternatives turned out to be viable. A poor showing in Iowa would be a setback for Romney, but it is still difficult to construct a scenario by which any of his rivals can chart a path to the nomination. For all of his manifest flaws as a candidate and his inability to convince conservatives that he is one of them, it’s hard to envision Romney losing at this point.

Read More

Romneycare Blurb Not What Newt Needed

GOP Presidential candidate Ron Paul published bigoted newsletters in the 1980s. Now a much more recent, and not nearly as morally offensive, newsletter by Newt Gingrich will cause him problems with some conservative primary voters.

An April 2006 newsletter published by Mr. Gingrich’s former consulting company, the Center for Health Transformation, and discovered by the Wall Street Journal, included a two-page analysis, “Newt Notes,” which begins this way: “The most exciting development of the past few weeks is what has been happening up in Massachusetts. The health bill that Governor Romney signed into law this month has tremendous potential to effect major change in the American health system. We agree entirely with Governor Romney and Massachusetts legislators that our goal should be 100% insurance coverage for all Americans.”
Read More

Turkey, Israel and the Armenian Genocide

It goes without saying that had Turkey not spent the last few years doing everything it could to destroy its erstwhile alliance with Israel there would have been no debate in the Knesset yesterday about whether to commemorate the Turkish genocide of Armenians during World War I. But since the Turks have become the sponsors and perhaps even the financial backers of Hamas, the consensus within the Israel to stay away from anything touching the Armenian question has dissolved. Though there were some MKs who thought the commemoration should be shelved as part of a new effort to win back the affections of Turkey, most Israelis rightly understand the ship has sailed on good relations with its former ally.

The discussion will, it should be admitted, do nothing to ameliorate the now tense relationship, let alone revive the now shattered alliance between the two nations. With the Turks, as Max noted yesterday, willing to engage in name calling and accusations with France over the genocide issue, there can be no doubt that the Knesset’s session will only widen the breech between Ankara and Jerusalem. But rather than a mystery, the Turks’ decision to make a nearly century-old controversy a diplomatic litmus test can be understood in light of their history. Their unwillingness to bend even a little bit on the Armenians must be understood as something that speaks to their national identity and is unlikely to be dropped anytime soon.

Read More

Best Option to Stop Nukes? The Military.

Matthew Kroenig, a fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations who formerly served as a special adviser on Iran policy in the Defense Department, has an excellent article in Foreign Affairs on why a U.S. attack on Iran is the least bad of the available options. Kroenig lays out a detailed argument for why military action is feasible, why it’s preferable to a nuclear Iran and what the U.S. could do to minimize the inevitable fallout, and I sincerely hope Washington policy makers are reading it.

But there’s another argument that’s worth adding to Kroenig’s list: the relative track records of military versus nonmilitary efforts to stop nuclear proliferation.

Read More

An Inside Look at Ron Paul’s Extremism

One of the interesting ironies of the current Republican presidential race is that anytime a website publishes articles discussing Ron Paul’s extremist connections, they are bombarded by a flood of e-mails from his supporters denouncing the premise of the piece while often expressing the same kind of rhetoric that the article mentioned. Paul’s surge in the polls has brought with it the kind of scrutiny that has brought his ties to hate groups such as the John Birch Society and 9/11 “truthers” out into the open. But for those wanting to learn a little bit more about the man’s own views, a former staffer has now written a piece that makes it clear that while he claims to abhor prejudice, Paul is not, as some of his backers absurdly claim, a friend of Israel:

He is however, most certainly Anti-Israel, and Anti-Israeli in general. He wishes the Israeli state did not exist at all. He expressed this to me numerous times in our private conversations. His view is that Israel is more trouble than it is worth, specifically to the America taxpayer. He sides with the Palestinians, and supports their calls for the abolishment of the Jewish state, and the return of Israel, all of it, to the Arabs.

It should be specified that the congressman has described the writer, Eric Dondero, as a “disgruntled ex-employee” who was fired. So perhaps we can take his words with a grain of salt. But Dondero, a Navy veteran who worked for Paul off and on from 1987 to 2003, does know a thing or two about the candidate. He turned on Paul because of his opposition to the war in Iraq and has become a virulent foe. Nonetheless, Dondero’s comments about Paul’s feelings about Israel ring true for two reasons.

Read More