Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Will March be Cruel for Romney?

With about a third of the delegates chosen for the Republican convention, any reasonable analysis of the math shows Mitt Romney will almost certainly wind up being the nominee. But, as Sean Trende points out at Real Clear Politics, the frontrunner will have to wait until June at the earliest to amass the majority he needs to formally lock the contest up. That means perhaps as long as three more months for him to be attacked from the right as a “Massachusetts moderate,” which will make it harder for him to convince conservatives to turn out in November in the numbers needed to beat President Obama.

The really hard part for Romney is the prospect of a brutal March including contests in Kansas, Mississippi, Alabama, Missouri and Louisiana, where he will be the underdog to Rick Santorum. Though the upcoming weeks will bring some bright spots such as Hawaii, Puerto Rico and Illinois, where Romney will be favored, this will be a difficult period for the frontrunner as Santorum and Newt Gingrich (assuming he doesn’t drop out or become as marginal as Ron Paul), continue to abuse him as a product of the establishment whose health care record is indistinguishable from that of Obama. But as grim as that prospect may be for his campaign, if their candidate can pocket one or two of the states where he is thought to have little chance, it could alter an otherwise unpromising March narrative.

Trende’s analysis of the upcoming contests predicts defeats for Romney in the south along with likely losses in Kansas and Missouri. A string of defeats to Santorum in those states along with what may be a replay in Illinois of his narrow victories in Michigan and Ohio would paint a portrait of a faltering “inevitable” candidate who is weakest in his party’s heartland. Even worse, it could create more pressure on Newt Gingrich to drop out in Santorum’s favor though, as I wrote yesterday, I think the odds of that happening are slim.

Yet as long as Gingrich stays in the race, Romney still has an opportunity to steal one or two southern states. Though there has not been much polling done for many of the upcoming primaries, the most recent one coming out of Alabama shows the assumption that he hasn’t a chance anywhere in the Deep South may be mistaken. An Alabama Education Association poll published on Wednesday of likely Republican voters gave Romney a 9-percentage point lead over both Santorum and Gingrich who are in a virtual tie for second. We have seen bigger leads than that turn around in less time than the few days left until Alabama and Mississippi vote, and a Santorum victory in Kansas this weekend may help provide a bit more momentum to his low-budget campaign in the south.

With evangelicals providing many, if not most of the votes in these states, pundits do well to give Santorum the edge. But if Romney is able to use his superior financial resources to pull out one or two wins it may be a sign that after his Super Tuesday victories that lengthened his delegate lead, some conservatives may be prepared to throw in the towel and make their peace with him. A victory in any one of those that we may have assumed would go to Santorum could be a game changer in that respect. If so, it could transform March from the cruelest month in the GOP calendar for Romney to one in which his nomination became that much more certain.

Introducing Commentary Complete

6 Responses to “Will March be Cruel for Romney?”

  1. Robert_Graves says:

    November will be the cruelest month, if Mitt Romney is the GOP's nominee.

    • michaelmas12 says:

      Yup- cruel for Obama and the worst President since- at least- Carter….

      • Robert_Graves says:

        I should have had a second cup of coffee before I replied. I intended to say that, if Romney becomes the GOP's nominee, November would be the cruelest month, because Romney could not prevail against Barak Obama.

  2. Rose says:

    November may be too cruel for Romney – but not a fraction as cruel as it would be for Santorum and Newt and Paul. It is a Sad Year for America. It is very sad when even the GOP will so completely shut out a real Conservative that it even redefines those in the race as "Conservatives", when not a one of them could be CONVICTED of being one. nEach Candidate's highest praise comes from HIMSELF and NOT from a significant portion of WE THE PEOPLE. nDisgusting to conclude that Mitt is the best of the lot – that America has not been able to field a person with a better record than Mitt. nIf a "miracle" should happen and one of the other three gain the nomination, the drop in participation in November will be stunning. I'll go vote, but it won't be for a RINO. I'll write in the name of a Conservative.

  3. Rose says:

    I have NEVER made the case that Romney is a CONSERVATIVE – quite the opposite. I've tried to make the case that the other three are even worse. nOne thing Mitt has in his favor is that he is a Capitalist by trade and by ideology, which is something that cannot be said of the other three at all. In fact, I would classify the other three as Feudalists, trading in Govt favors for any sweetheart deals they have prospered by. n nI don't know if that is enough. n nFrankly, I lean towards a write-in for a REAL Conservative. nI know I will NEVER vote for Santorum, Newt, or Paul – PERIOD. NOT AN OPTION. I see NO BENEFIT to such a vote in NOVEMBER. It will not happen. nI don't feel good about Mitt Romney, he is NOT a Conservative. I might shock myself and vote for him – but I would do anything, AFTER SEEING THE RECORD OF THE OTHER THREE, to keep THEM OUT of ANY Office at all. nAny legal thing, regarding how I cast my own vote or influence others in the casting of their one, LEGAL vote, each. nI think Mitt is capable in an ordinary year of NOT advancing the cause of Marxists very much. nAT THIS TIME, I am not sure he has the DESIRE to try to Save the UNION, the NATION, from utter destruction via Marxist machinations. nBut I am adamant about my gut – studied – response to Santorum, Newt, and Paul. And their records. And I will not give them any Authorization represented by my Vote or my tolerance of them.

Leave a Reply