Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Verdict on Toulouse: French Incompetence

Mohammad Merah, the self-confessed murderer of Jewish schoolchildren and French soldiers, died while jumping from his bathroom window in a torrent of police gunfire around 11:30 this morning in Toulouse. “This man doesn’t interest me,” Nicole Yardeni, the president of the regional Council of Jews, scoffed after the 32-hour siege had finally ended. “He is only an instrument of death.” But the French press seemed plenty interested. “Itinerary of a killer,” Le Parisien headlined its story over a front-page photo of a smirking Merah. “End of the road for a killer,” L’Humanite trumpeted. “Trajectory of hatred,” Libération blared.

Perhaps it was well that the French had become interested in Merah at last. Although he was on a Direction Centrale du Renseignement Intérieur “watch list” since 2008, no one was apparently watching him.

Claude Guéant, the interior minister, defended the French intelligence agency’s failure by saying it follows “a lot of people engaged in radical Islamism. Expressing ideas and manifesting Salafist opinions is not grounds enough for prosecution,” he explained.

Maybe not, but Merah did more than merely express Salafist opinions. A neighbor in Toulouse filed two police complaints after Merah had tried to recruit her son to jihad by showing him Al Qaeda videos of murders and beheadings, Haaretz reported earlier today. A petty criminal who was known to police for his violent streak from childhood, Merah was radicalized in prison, traveled to Pakistan and Afghanistan to receive terrorist training at the hands of Al Qaeda, and returned to France determined to kill.

Even when they had Merah cornered, the French authorities did not appear to know what to do with him. After two gunshots were heard from Merah’s apartment shortly before 1:00 in the morning, Guéant wondered aloud if Merah had killed himself. French commandos waited another ten hours, with no communication from Merah, before assaulting his apartment. A special camera was inserted into the apartment, but Merah could not be found. Finally he fired upon them from the balcony and retreated to his bathroom to await them. When the commandos burst in, Merah emerged from the bathroom, firing ferociously, wounding one officer in the foot. Then he dashed back to the bathroom and flung himself from the window.

A columnist for the Telegraph described Merah as a Nike or “Just Do It” terrorist. “[I]ntelligence experts believe al-Qaeda no longer has the organisational capacity to conduct [spectacular] attacks [like 9/11],” Con Coughlin wrote. “Instead they are focusing their energy on softer targets.” Merah may be among the first of a new wave of “lone wolf” terrorists, experts fear.

That’s one fear. My fear is that French powerlessness — the French inability to stop Merah before he murdered Jews and soldiers, the French incompetence at preventing him from writing the last chapter of his own story, going out in a blaze of gunfire, refusing to be taken alive — will only encourage more Islamist terrorists. Whether France has shown that it cannot protect its Jews remains an open question. What France has abundantly demonstrated, however, is that it cannot prevent known Islamists from carrying out terrorist attacks on French soil, nor capture them alive once they have done so.

Introducing Commentary Complete

5 Responses to “Verdict on Toulouse: French Incompetence”

  1. @alpipkin says:

    One doesn't need to go all the way to France to look for incompetence. The Fort Hood massacre is a closer to home example. The US Army brass and FBI investigators are as much to blame as the French.

  2. mhloutbeltway says:

    I agree with your judgment, although I really doubt that Sarkozy and the French judicial system had any interest in taking this Mohammed alive. It would have led to even more embarrassments. But what is truly troubling is how the leadership of the one nation in the world whose raison d'etre is the protection of Jews wherever praised the French government for its performance. Today Ehud Barak, the highly decorated Israeli Defense Minister and erstwhile prime minister, says he has complete confidence in the French. The other day it was opposition leader Tzipi Livni to have said the same. Their statements do little to inspire much confidence among Jews whether they live in Galut or in Eretz Israel.

  3. Ofer Maimon says:

    It would seem the critique against the Intelligence work might be valid. Intelligence organizations are however complicated mechanisms, an there is no model that will be fail proof. The critique of the operation is simply plain silly. If someone is holed up with enough weaponry for a minor civil war, and has decided to die rather than give up, there is not much you can do and anyone with a minimum of combat training understands this. And Ehud Barak, the most decorated combat soldier in Israel, most exceedingly did not earn all those medals by taking terrorists alive. Criticizing people who have risked their lives to protect their fellow human beings under the worst possible conditions is distasteful.

    • steven L says:

      The Fr. security service put French police on the firing line by failing to monitor correctly this fanatic Islamist. He should have been picked-up long ago. They need to go to Israel to learn.

  4. steven L says:

    Alive, he would have forced the Fr Gvt to take a side. Dead, Fr does not need to take a side. He will quickly be forgotten until the next Jew is killed and it will go on and on until Jews say ENOUGH is ENOUGH. Over the opinion of antisemitic-Jews and the left.

Leave a Reply