Commentary Magazine


Contentions

SEALs Criticize Obama’s Grandstanding

Listening to the Obama campaign gush about the president’s courageous decision regarding the Osama bin Laden raid, you might think he was the one who piloted the helicopter, raided the compound, and fired the legendary shot. But what do the actual American heroes who risk their lives in these types of missions think? The Daily Mail spoke to several Navy SEALs who are mystified by the argument that President Obama’s decision was uniquely heroic:

A serving SEAL Team member said: ‘Obama wasn’t in the field, at risk, carrying a gun. As president, at every turn he should be thanking the guys who put their lives on the line to do this. He does so in his official speeches because the speechwriters are smart.

“But the more he tries to take the credit for it, the more the ground operators are saying, ‘Come on, man!’ It really didn’t matter who was president. At the end of the day, they were going to go.”

Chris Kyle, a former SEAL sniper with 160 confirmed and another 95 unconfirmed kills to his credit, said: ‘The operation itself was great and the nation felt immense pride. It was great that we did it.

“But bin Laden was just a figurehead. The war on terror continues. Taking him out didn’t really change anything as far as the war on terror is concerned and using it as a political attack is a cheap shot.”

Exactly. Every American will cheer on the bin Laden raid, and Obama’s gutsy decision to go ahead with it. Killing bin Laden was a wildly popular move – there has never been any serious debate in this country about whether or not to do it. The real debate has been about the less-popular steps that need to be taken to keep America safe in the War on Terror. Vice President Biden likes to say that Obama has a backbone “like a ramrod,” but where has that backbone been when it comes to the unpopular decisions during wartime? Obama is cutting out early in Afghanistan, quietly blasting away al-Qaeda leaders with drones instead of capturing them for intelligence, and hoping that tensions in Iraq don’t boil over before the November election, as not to mar his claim the was is over.

When you think of all the complex, critical, gut-wrenching decisions a commander-in-chief has to make during times of war, the decision to send in SEALs to bump off the world’s most hated terrorist leader and mass murderer of thousands of Americans is pretty cut-and-dry in the scheme of things.

Sen. John McCain made a similar point on Fox News yesterday:

“I say any president, Jimmy Carter, anybody, any president would have, obviously, under those circumstances, done the same thing. And to now take credit for something that any president would do is indicative of the kind of campaign we’re under — we’re — we’re seeing…So all I can say is that this is going to be a very rough campaign,” McCain told Fox News in an interview… “And I’ve had the great honor of serving in the company of heroes. And, you know the thing about heroes, they don’t brag.”

A lesson about how heroes don’t brag, from someone who would know. In fact, some would say McCain’s own modesty hurt him in 2008, because he was reluctant to make his time as a POW a focus of his campaign.

Introducing Commentary Complete

7 Responses to “SEALs Criticize Obama’s Grandstanding”

  1. Despite what McCain says, it's cool to brag.

    • gigireceda says:

      Sorry, it is not "cool" to brag. That's the mindset of an immature narcissist. BHO cannot resist it because of that. A mature president (or person, in general) would focus all the attention on the SEALs who carried out the mission, not on himself. But this is nothing new from our arrogant,narcissist in chief. He has diminished the office of President in a very significant way.

      • Common Sense says:

        Kinda like "mission Accomplished' by Bush? except BHO actually accomplished the mission, everyone should remember that 9/11 happened on Bush's watch

  2. Tom Gregg says:

    Excuse me? How many "dissidents" have been "tortured" under the auspices of the Patriot Act? And as for the Patriot Act being adopted "WITHOUT public approval or vote," how is that different from any other bill duly passed by Congress and signed into law by the president? n nThe Patriot Act may or may not include some questionable provisions—reasonable people can disagree about that. But to claim that 9/11 was used as a pretext to create an "Orwellian society" is just 100% pure, USDA-inspected baloney. Unless, that is, you have a tape recording of the sinister Dick Cheney giving the oafish George W. Bush his matching orders…

  3. Keith_Vlasak says:

    If Iraq does blow up, I'm afraid Obama and the MSM will use the blow up as proof that Obama's some kind of genius to get America out of there and suggest the whole effort was a waste. I think it's a mistake to think that the public will conclude his hasty withdrawal (read as abandonment) would be the cause of any trouble in the near future.

  4. besht2003 says:

    And they are being abducted and their DNA is extracted to find a cure for the alien toxin which liquifies bones and flesh, so when the aliens take over the world, a small group of secretive government insiders can….oh wait that's X-Files. Never mind.

  5. canislupus100 says:

    He desperately needs to take credit for something. His tenure in the White House has been a litany of failure. He seems to have the reverse Midas touch. Whatever he touches turns to feces.

Leave a Reply