American Crossroads is out with a new ad today pushing back on President Obama’s Bain Capital attacks by assailing his own epic “public equity” failures, such as Solyndra and the auto bailout:
So far, Mitt Romney has steered clear of negative attacks when responding to the Bain Capital criticism. Instead, he’s highlighted his record of achievement at Bain, and pointed out that even top Democrats and Obama campaign surrogates have called the president’s attacks on private equity unfair. But, as the American Crossroads ad shows, there’s also plenty of ammo to strike back with. While Bain Capital may not have succeeded at turning around every company it bought – such is the nature of the business – at least it wasn’t playing recklessly with taxpayer money. Kimberly Strassel argued this point in the Wall Street Journal last week:
All those Republicans grousing about the president’s attacks on private equity might instead be seizing on this beautiful point of contrast. Mr. Obama, after all, is no mere mortal president. Even as he’s been busy with the day job, he’s found time to moonlight as CEO-in-Chief of half the nation’s industry. Detroit, the energy sector, health care—he’s all over these guys like a cheap spreadsheet.
Like Mr. Romney, Mr. Obama has presided over bankruptcies, layoffs, lost pensions, run-ups in debt. Yet unlike Mr. Romney, Mr. Obama’s C-suite required billions in taxpayer dollars and subsidies, as well as mandates, regulations, union payoffs and moral hazard. Don’t like “vulture” capitalism? Check out the form the president’s had on offer these past three years: “crony” capitalism.
This is a line of attack the Romney campaign has been waiting to roll out for awhile. It looks like American Crossroads and other outside groups will be doing the heavy lifting for now, but Mike Allen reports that Romney is planning a targeted campaign against specific stimulus projects in individual states:
A senior aide tells us Mitt Romney plans to begin hitting specific stimulus projects as he travels, arguing that President Obama has actually subtracted jobs: “Were these investments the best return on tax dollars, or given for ideological reasons, to donors, for political reasons? He spent $800 billion of everybody’s money. How’d it work out? It was the mother of all earmarks, not a jobs plan. By wasting all of this money, you had the worst of all worlds: It destroyed confidence in the economy, and makes people less likely to borrow money. Dodd-Frank has been a disaster for the economy. Where are the steady hands? Who’s in charge of energy? Where’s the strong, confident voice on the economy?”
Smart points. The last thing the Obama campaign wants to bring up now is Solyndra, drawing attention to its failures on both energy and the economic stimulus. The more Romney talks about this, the more it seems like the Obama campaign severely underestimated its opposition.










Romney is better off having outside groups do the heavy lifting.
Romney would be wise to repeat the point made by Michelle Bachmann about how profitable GM dealerships owned by Republicans were shut down while politically connected less prosperous dealers remained in business. n nThere is LightSquared for which Obama ought to be impeached for treason, had that gone through it would have severely compromised our national security. There is the State of California bringing criminal HazMat cleanup actions against Solyndra, what folk don't know is that "green" energy isn't always "clean" energy to make. There is that lovely Chevy Volt parody ad and a lot of safety concerns about hybrids that folks don't know — including voltages far higher than your household current and approaching that of "the third rail" of the METRO. Yep, you're sitting 5 inches from the "third rail" which is all fine & good until you get into an accident. n nBy the way, how many Bald Eagles have been killed by these wind turbines? Quite a few, actually, and while they are back in numbers far greater than many realize, no longer really endangered anymore, people still go to jail for killing Bald Eagles. Except when they kill them with an Obama-friendly wind turbine.
Not a good ad. It concedes the Democrat/Liberal premise that Layoffs=Bad. This is actually a populist, not a Republican/Conservative ad. The ad suggests that it would have fine to give money to GM, Solyndra, etc, if they had not resulting in layoffs. n nThe effective ad would have been to point out Obama's dishonesty for attacking Romney for what he himself does, only not as well as Romney did it. n nBut, alas, if even American Crossroads can't get the message right, I'm afraid no one can.