A couple of days ago, the Wall Street Journal published a fascinating article on the Iranian success of “All My Joys,” the latest album by the Israeli singer Rita. Tucked into the article is a mention of another this past July by Fars, a news outfit affiliated with the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, that called the album Israel’s “latest plot in a soft war” to win over the Iranian people.
It’s easy to scoff at Iranian paranoia. But the Iranian regime is right to worry over the impact of a Western music album flourishing in its streets. That album might just be the most potent threat it faces.
As background, it is relatively not all that surprising that an Israeli singer would find listeners in Iran. Rita, whose long career has until recently been based on songs sung in Hebrew and English, was born in Iran and speaks fluent Persian, the language of “All My Joys.” According to the most recent numbers from the Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics, Rita is one of 50,000 Israeli Jews who were born in Iran, and one of 142,000 who can trace their roots back to the country, where a remnant today remains as witness to the once great Jewish community that flourished there for thousands of years.
While her singing is not an element of a secret plot directed against the purity of the Islamic Republic from Jerusalem, it is true that she represents something potently disruptive of the regime’s pieties. To put it gently, she is an attractive woman who knows how to use her appeal to make a show. Her freedom to do so for any of her fellow citizens who might care to listen and watch, all of them free from government meddling, may not be the most inspiring element of the freedoms Western society has come to stand for but is perhaps the most powerful one.
Rita’s existence – and the personal liberty it implies for both herself and her many Israeli fans – is the force most likely to permanently dislodge the Ayatollah’s grip over his country. For it is the yearning for a similar freedom that drew millions of Iranians into the streets three years ago, and that is driving some of them now to seek out her music. The Journal quotes a middle-aged woman from Tehran saying of Rita, “So what if she is from Israel?” That seems to me to precisely capture the spirit and power of freedom’s pull. For most, it is not written in the grand language of rights or protests, but in the simple desire to stand up and dance to a song you find appealing only because you do.
It is strange that all of this is not more readily granted in our debates, but that is itself a sign of materialism’s hold over many of our intellectuals. From whatever direction we debate, so lost have we become in the conviction that all of society’s outcomes are determined by who holds the ring or the factory keys that we have forgotten the primary power of culture, and the more immediate desires to think and feel as one chooses.
It would be foolish to imagine that one Israeli album song in Persian can end the possible need for an Israeli military action against Iran, or prevent a confrontation between our country and the Ayatollah. But we should remember the ultimate and powerful appeal of Israel’s culture and feel no shame in exporting it the world over.










One of the great pities of this growing confrontation is that there exists in Iran a large mass of people who would like to see their country rejoin the civilized world. They don't support the bloodthirsty threats against Israel emanating from their leaders, and would like to see the mullahs deposed. It was three years ago this month that so many of them took to the streets to demand freedom, only to be held at arm's length by President Obama and Secretary Clinton. Afraid of offending the mullahs, they couldn't even manage to pay lip service to the legitimate aspirations of these unfortunate people, and consequently their uprising was crushed. We'll never know how successful it could have been, but it is certain that this was one of the Obama administration's most shameful moments.
The iranian people are indeed ill-served by the vile theocracy that rules their country. n nHowever, your comment that Obama held the protesters at arm's length for fear of offending the mullahs is a crock. Perhaps you should re-think that nonsense and develop an understanding as to why it would have not served the interests of the protesters to have been identified with the USA. n nIt's SOP for the theocrats to call protesters agents and spies and lackeys of the West…makes it easier to toss them in jail, torture them and publish confessions so as to paint the whole thing as CIA-sponsored.
As you stated yourself, it's SOP for the Iranian government to claim C.I.A. involvement whether it's there or not. The jailings, torture, and worse all took place anyway, even without our overt support for the protesters. However, the sad fact is that they called for our help despite it all, and we ignored them. Shame on us!
Ed, we did nothing at all akin to ignoring them. Please don't make a statement based on nothing more than confusing the lack of of a PR release that would be pleasing to our ears and useless or worse to the protesters with "doing nothing". n nI know one or two people who were communicating with the protesters while the protests were going on. things were done…and are still being done.
Matthew Ackerman gets it exactly right.Pop Music from Louie Armstrong and Dizzy Gillespie to Elvis and The Beatles helped win the Cold War.