Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Palestinians Go Back to UN Dead-End

One would have thought the Palestinians might have learned their lesson when they devoted all of their efforts last year to an attempt to get the United Nations to issue a unilateral recognition of their independence. Many predicted the showdown over the initiative would produce a “diplomatic tsunami” that would overwhelm Israel and do serious damage to its political standing around the world and even in the United States. But those predictions, which were rightly debunked here at Contentions before the UN General Assembly met last September, proved to be mere hot air. Rather than a tsunami, the Palestinian push to make an end run around the peace process was a total flop, as even many European and Third World countries not sympathetic to Israel bailed on them.

But rather than moving on from that failure and seeking a diplomatic path to statehood, Saeb Erekat, the Palestinian Authority’s chief negotiator, told the Times of Israel today that he and PA leader Mahmoud Abbas are heading back to the UN this fall for another tilt at the statehood windmill. Observers should take this signal for what it is: an indisputable statement of their disinterest in making peace with Israel on any terms.

The Palestinian failure at the UN exposed more than their leadership’s faulty judgment. It demonstrated that even an international community that could always be counted on to bash Israel understood that a peace accord had to precede a Palestinian state. The idea of giving even symbolic sovereignty to the Fatah-Hamas mess was always a non-starter. The world body made it clear to the Palestinian Authority that if it wanted a state, negotiations with Israel was the only way to get it.

But if this message fell on deaf Palestinian ears it is not because the PA’s leadership doesn’t understand that they have no more chance of getting UN approval for their proposal than they have of persuading the Israelis of giving up and disbanding their state. If they would prefer another humiliation at the UN to talking with the Israelis it is not because the Israelis won’t negotiate — the Netanyahu government has been pleading with the PA to engage in talks without preconditions for more than three years — but because negotiations are the one thing that really scares them.

The UN ploy has exposed for anyone who cares to open their eyes the fact that the political culture of the Palestinians still makes it impossible for the PA — whether it is run by Abbas and his Fatah alone or in conjunction with the terrorists of Hamas — to recognize the legitimacy of a Jewish state no matter where its borders would be drawn. The only kind of Palestinian state they want or can possibly accept is one that won’t require them to pledge to end the conflict and live in amity with their Jewish neighbors, even if all settlements in the West Bank were wiped off the map.

Erekat and apologists will go on blaming the Israelis and talking about settlements being an obstacle to peace even though Netanyahu has signaled that he is willing to give up territory if it means a real and permanent peace. But the rerun of their UN fiasco is proof that they would rather have their European allies shame them than go back to the table. Middle East peace is still theoretically possible, but so long as the Palestinians prefer surefire diplomatic failure to negotiations, it remains but a dream.

Introducing Commentary Complete

7 Responses to “Palestinians Go Back to UN Dead-End”

  1. rulieg says:

    yes, Jonathan, people who want to see will see…but sadly there are so few people who want to see. n nthe Pals would be utterly crazy to try this before the American election. Obama and his UN minion Susan Rice will once again regretfully decline to help the Pals (with whom they mostly sympathize); but he's already hemorrhaging Jewish votes, he won't want to lose any more. n nif however, G-d forbid, Obama is reelected, then I recommend that the PA try the UN gambit. unshackled from the need to gain Jewish approval, Obama will probably have more, uh, "flexibility"…

  2. non-interest, not disinterest

    • Cynic says:

      Yes, one of the meanings of disinterest is “unbiased” and that I would not apply to the Palestinians, nor to West in general.

  3. Elie says:

    My one and only correction to this insightful post is from the following snippet:r nr n…”the PA u2014 whether it is run by Abbas and his Fatah alone or in conjunction with the terrorists of Hamas…”r nr n This is a serious omission for all of the above are terrorists, are they not.

  4. Charlie Hall says:

    Those who opposed or continue to oppose the Oslo Accords because they think that Oslo was bad for Israel should pause and reflect on this: n nIt is only because of the Oslo Accords, that provided that a Palestinian State should emerge only after negotiations with Israel, that the Palestinian action is out of line. Remember that the UN voted in 1947 to create a Palestinian State.

    • Cynic says:

      Remember what the Arabs told the UN to do with their offer, and then went to war against the fledgling Jewish state, to lose and to blame it all on the Zionists.r nHo hum.

    • Chaz, on 29 November 1947, the UN general assembly voted to recommend –Note the word: Recommend– establishment of a Jewish state & an Arab state in the mandated territory of "palestine," with an international enclave in and around Jerusalem [including Bethlehem]. At that time, nobody talked about a "palestinian people," least of all the Palestinian Arabs themselves. Their spokesmen had testified before the Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry on palestine in 1946 that there was "no Palestine in history" and that it was "all Syria." Since the spokesmen of the Palestinian Arabs at the time denied existence of "palestine" in history & of course did not speak of a "palestinian people," they had no wish for a "palestinian state." Rather, as good pan-Arabists and good Muslims, they wanted to be part of a great pan-Arab state. Hence they started on November 30, 1947, the war that became known as the Israeli War of Independence. Today as then the Arab leadership is not especially interested in a separate state but in getting rid of the Jews. That's why they attacked Jewish civilians throughout the country on 11-30-1947.

Leave a Reply