Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Those Stupid Arafat Conspiracy Theories

I honestly can’t believe we’re expected to take seriously the Al Jazeera “scoop” about Yasir Arafat being murdered. Disgraceful innuendo-filled articles of the type being written by the AP and published by the Washington Post are reporting “evidence” to the effect that Arafat might have been poisoned with Polonium 210. The proof, such as it is, comes from unusual levels of Po 210 reportedly detected on Arafat’s clothing and toothbrush by a Swiss lab in the last few months.

But given how math works, and taking into account the isotope’s 138 day half-life, that’s inane.

The minimum amount of Po 210 that’s fatal when ingested is about 50 nanograms (ng). Alexander Litvinenko, widely thought to have been poisoned with the radioactive element by the Russians in 2006, ingested around 10,000 ng, or 200 times the minimum lethal dose. That’s a tiny amount, but nonetheless there was so much Polonium in Litvinenko’s system that his sweat left a car permanently unusable and his house uninhabitable for six months. As a diagnostic matter, it was obvious to doctors he had been poisoned.

None of that was true for Arafat. Doctors couldn’t tell by looking at him whether he had been poisoned and he was not irradiating entire cars and buildings. So he would have had to ingest less Po 210 than Litvinenko. Let’s peg the amount at 5,000 ng, which is 100 times more than the fatal dose but still half of what Litvinenko ingested. As you’re about to see, the math works out in such a way that the actual amount doesn’t matter as long as it’s kept reasonable.

After having planned and launched Intifada II and been militarily defeated, Arafat died in November 2004. The Swiss lab had his clothing for a few months. so let’s round down to 7 years as the interval between his death and the tests. That’s 2556 days (one leap year) divided by a half-life of 138 equals about 18.5 iterations. Put everything together – 5000 ng/(2^18.5) – and the result is about 0.0135 ng of Po 210 that should have been detectable on Arafat’s possessions today. That’s 0.0000135 micrograms. Four zeros of padding.

If we double the dosage to what Litvinenko ingested, the amount left over today would double to 0.0000270 micrograms. Double the dosage again – so now it would be twice as much as received by Litvinenko, who was visibly poisoned and who leaked radiation across half of London – and the amount today should be 0.0000540 micrograms. There’s just no way to get a reasonable amount of Polonium left over because the denominator, representing halving every 138 days for 7 years, overwhelms everything else.

The conspiracy mongers, however, have found a solution. They simply assert that given how much Polonium was found at the Swiss lab, whatever the math says should have been the original amount, that’s ipso facto the amount Arafat ingested. QED. As Elder of Ziyon pointed out, that amount of Po 210 contradicts the only thing we do know, which is that Arafat died slowly in a not-obviously-poisoned condition. Al Jazeera has been trying to dodge the obvious point by blandly inventing the idea we just don’t know what Polonium poisoning looks like. The dearth of knowledge will be news to the Swiss lab investigator who flatly stated that “the clinical description of Chairman Arafat’s symptoms prior to his death is not compatible with Polonium poisoning.”

This tripe is the worst anti-Israel conspiracy theory since the tourism-destroying Zionist attack sharks, and more’s the pity. I was really looking forward to following Newsweek’s suggestion that I “get smarter in 2012″ by watching Al Jazeera. Now it turns out the network would rather indulge in feverish conspiracy mongering than carry out junior high school arithmetic before running stories. One begins to really worry that Hillary Clinton was wrong about Al Jazeera’s vaunted news ethics.

Introducing Commentary Complete

5 Responses to “Those Stupid Arafat Conspiracy Theories”

  1. Ed_Zuckerbrod says:

    In the past, when the Palestinians found themselves edged off the front pages and feeling ignored, they simply blew something or someone up. I guess in a way you can call the hatching of this crackpot theory a sign of progress.

  2. The only proof required in the Arab courts are an answer to the question ‘Cui bono’ (except phrased in Arabic). n nAs that question, and you always arrive at the guilty party! n n nAnd if the situation does not seem to benefit the Jews at first glance, that is further proof of the Jews’ involvement, as everyone knows the Jews are crafty and always cleverly obfuscate their involvement. n n nIt’s all breathtakingly simple, really. Any Arab child knows it.

  3. mtbieker says:

    Here's a simple minded calculation based on a 100 ug dose and even distribution across the entire body nDay 1: nMass: 0.1 mg nRadioactivity: 16 GBq nWatt: .0133 nDay 2800 (appx now): nMass 8e-11 g nRadioactivity: 13,500 Bq n nNow the urine sample was about 180 mBq. That's about 1/75,000 th of the total body dose. So if arafat weighed 75 kg. (165 lbs) and the radiation was distributed evenly through his body, this would be about 1 gram of body, or about 1/4 teaspoon in volume…not exactly unbelievable. n nI purposely picked numbers to make it semi-reasonable. I'm not trying to prove he was poisoned. I'm just proving that you can't very well rule out poisoning…contrary to what a lot of people are saying.

  4. theazcowboy says:

    On Arafat: I see the Jewish barbarians begin to get worried about 'another' of their 'perfect crimes' coming unraveled, (panic-panic), huh? When Shieke Nasallah get's all the facts in the Mossad/CIA's murder of PM Hariri, the plot will thicken and more things to worry by the ZioNazi's huh Pilgrims? And when the 'kryton' nuke igniters mystery unfolds and Natanyahu is in the middle of the 'Gifilte fish soup bowl.' Mama mia, what to do, huh Pals?

  5. Edmund Samph says:

    Obviously you have made the mistake of trying to confuse them with the facts and truth, which is clearly not what they are after, They are much more concerned with clouding the issue with propaganda, bogus claims and impossible to substantiate implications which like most tabloid newspapers sells well, but has nothing to do with the truth. Forgive me for forgetting that truth as victim is not the focus of their efforts.

Leave a Reply