Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Editor of Israel-Kurd Magazine Still Missing

It has now been a month since Mawloud Afand, the editor of Israel-Kurd magazine, went missing in the Iraqi Kurdish city of Sulaymani. Afand had published Israel-Kurd for two years when he disappeared. Abe Greenwald covered the kidnapping, here.

Both Israeli intelligence sources and the Kurdish press say he was kidnapped by Iranian intelligence agents in Sulaymani after the Kurdish government ignored Iran’s demands that the Kurdish government shut down the magazine. In July 2010, the Kurdistan Regional Government’s representative to Tehran sent a letter to Barham Salih, the Kurdish prime minister, in which he reported Iranian unhappiness with the magazine, after Kurdish authorities promised Tehran that it would be closed down.

Rudaw, a Kurdish news outlet funded by Nechirvan Barzani, places blame on both Iranian authorities and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK). The PUK, for its part, refuses to investigate the case. While the PUK has a pro-American reputation in Washington, thanks largely to the efforts of Barham Salih and Qubad Talabani, the pro-Iranian faction inside the organization has long been dominant. Indeed, Barham Salih recently left for a four-day trip to Iran, and Qubad’s eldest brother Bafil Talabani was exiled after he helped Iranian agents infiltrate through PUK territory and into Mosul, where they killed American contractors.

According to Kurdish authorities, the exile came after an American intelligence ultimatum that he either leave Kurdistan or suffer the consequences more directly. Former PUK Prime Minister Kosrat Rasul has once again cast his lot with the Iranians, after concluding the Americans are a fleeting power, at least in Iraq. Barham Salih, while perceived as pro-American in Washington, is perceived as pro-Iranian in Tehran. He often travels to Iran to meet with senior Iranian politicians and security officials and, according to the Iranian press, he is there now. When Jalal Talabani fell ill several years ago, Barham met Iranian authorities to help him fill the vacuum should Talabani not recover. Abe Greenwald was right when he concluded that Afand’s kidnapping was “another reminder of the Iranian regime’s implacable and ever more brazen savagery in a world abandoned by the leadership of the American superpower.”

What is truly shameful, however, is the muted response of both the White House and major American papers. It is rather telling when a Lebanese newspaper in Beirut shows more interest in the fate of Afand than the New York Times or the Washington Post, let alone Jewish interest publications like Tablet Magazine and the Forward.

Now, realists may say that by promoting mutual understanding in a place like the Middle East or by countering incitement, Afand was too provocative, and others may say that his return to Iraqi Kurdistan simply isn’t a U.S. interest. Both are wrong: Civil society must start somewhere, and by the way Iranian leaders think, every action is a trial balloon. If it engenders no response, than Iranian authorities conclude they can kidnap with impunity. Today it may be Afand; tomorrow, it will be an American. After all, considering the scope of the last three decades of American-Iranian relations, Iranian kidnapping of Americans is more the rule than the exception.