In the last week, the Romney campaign got a taste of some of the same treatment from the mainstream media that has afflicted Republicans for decades. The GOP candidate’s foreign trip was widely lampooned. The substantive issues he discussed in Israel and Poland were buried underneath a torrent of ridicule because of his Olympics gaffe as well as the media’s blind acceptance of the false idea he had misspoken about the Palestinians. Some of the frustration of the Romney camp became visible today in Warsaw, when a staffer blew up as reporters shouted questions at the candidate as he left a wreath at the Polish Tomb of the Unknown Soldier.
The irony is, as Politico reports, members of the media had their own beef with Romney because he has largely stiffed them on the trip, affording them virtually no opportunities to ask questions or interact with the man they are covering. There are some lessons to be learned here for the Romney campaign, though those in his camp may be too mad about the poor treatment their guy has gotten to pay attention. Nevertheless, now would be a good time for them to remember that while they cannot undo liberal media bias, there are better ways to cope with it. Indeed, the choice for every Republican or conservative is pretty much the same as it has always been. Romney can try and be a Ronald Reagan, and he and his team can present a positive face to the country and the media no matter how badly he’s treated, or he can be another Richard Nixon and scowl and fight with the press.
I think we all know which of those two scenarios will work out better, so here are four easy rules for coping with the problem of media bias that Romney and every Republican ought to follow:
1. Gaffes are nobody’s fault but your own. Liberal bias cannot be wished away, but you can control how you act and what you say. It does no good to complain about the media when your candidate hands them his head on a silver platter. What Romney said about the London Olympics was probably true, but he ought to know better than to say so out loud in public.
2. The press may be the enemy, but walling yourself off from them isn’t going to make things better. It’s true that no presidential candidate was more inaccessible than Barack Obama was in 2008, and his press conferences since then have been few and far between, but any Republican who expects to be treated fairly isn’t smart enough to be president. Conservatives may have snickered at John McCain’s openness with the press in 2000 and during the 2008 primaries, but it worked–at least for a while. It may not be possible to do that under Romney’s current circumstances, but he should be prepared to expose himself more often to tough, even adversarial questions. It won’t be any easier when he squares off with Barack Obama in the October debates.
3. Smile and stay on message. Romney has had his moments of public irritation during the campaign, but in general, he has avoided meltdowns. While affable, he lacks the common touch that great politicians instinctively possess. This is not a fatal flaw, but he needs to make a greater effort to tell us what kind of person he is. Modern campaigns think they can bypass a biased media and address the public without the filter of the press, but that doesn’t remove an obligation to try and do better. Even if you believe, as Rush Limbaugh does, that some in the media are trying to create gaffes as much as report them, Romney will do better to show some humility and laugh at himself more often. That’s a tactic that can disarm even the nastiest of critics. Like it or not, the media still has a large audience, so it is Romney’s obligation to show the press he is as good a guy as those who know him say he is. And his staff needs to follow the same pattern.
4. The message, not the media, is what counts most. Right now, the Romney camp is fuming about what they think is the media’s sabotaging of his foreign tour. But he needs to remember that he didn’t go to Britain, Israel and Poland to play media games but to put his foreign policy agenda on display. Romney may have undermined that effort in Britain, but his speech in Israel on the Iranian threat and his acknowledgement that Jerusalem was the country’s capital was exactly what he needed to do. The Polish visit and the endorsement of Lech Walesa did the same. Instead of worrying about what the press is saying, the Romney camp needs to be showing confidence.
The bottom line is that no matter how raw a deal you’ve received, whining about media bias does nothing but make a candidate look weak and stupid. Republicans can’t alter liberal media bias, but they can rise above it. The sooner Romney’s camp realizes this and starts reading from Reagan’s playbook, the better off they’ll be.










On the other hand, I say good for Romney. The more the public views that video with the shouting reporter in Poland the better for Romney.
I disagree. This is not 1980. The so-called mainstream media are much less influential today than it was 30 years ago. They are in fierce competition now with new online media — a competition that is significantly more intense than it was even four years ago. Poll after poll tells us also that large majorities of the public believe the media are biased. Reagan had no choice but to be kind to the intermediary. I’m not at all sure that remains true. It may also be self-destructive as the leading media outlets — the NYT, WaPo, AP, Reuters, NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, PBS, NPR, etc. — have become ever more open and aggressive in their pro-Democrat bias.
This doesn’t mean that Romney is free of fault. He did hand his enemies in the media a field day by criticizing, however mildly, someone else’s Olympics. But the effort to slam him with the PA being upset was just outrageous and demands rough pushback.
I have a much simpler set of rules: Play offense on Obama 100% of the time, and with a lot harder hitting attacks. There is a lot to work with. The sell out of Pland and the Czech Republican over ABMs; the 1967 lines gaffe; failure of a Status of Forces Agreement (or whatever it is called) with Iraq; the bad "New Start" treaty; gutting the military; repeal of Don't ask Don't Tell; disasterous Iran policy; loss of Arab Spring; betrayal of Iranian revolution . . . the list goes on and on. And these are just the big substantive issues, not even mentioning true gaffes like iPod for Queen Elizabeth or bowing to Saudis or the unseemly haste to return the Churchill Bust. n nRomney will lose if he continues to play footsie with Obama. He must ATTACK, ATTACK, ATTACK, and never stop and then let Obama try to figure out what to say for once.
It's a very sad state of affairs when saying what has been widely reported in the press already, and telling the truth as you know it from extensive experience is a "gaffe" that ought to be avoided and a fault, and when the appearance of charisma or affability is somehow more important than substance. This is particularly true when the same press that carries on about such 'gaffes' then not a week later reports those same problems – without any acknowledgement that there was never a gaffe to begin with, just truth. n nThose in the press and the American public who push these memes, adhere to them, or even just shrug them off or condone them, ought to be royally ashamed.
BDZ is right. Smile and keep hitting hard. And the Olympic thing? Not a "gaffe".
Puleeze. Sure, let as smile be your umbrella. Why not be, hmmm, LBJ? Or JFK and his consigliere RFK? Sheesh.
I disagree strongly on (2). n nMcCain gained nothing from being accessible. He played by the media's rules and it bought him nothing. He even decided not to attack Obama for his association with Wright. He accepted public financing. In 2004 he objected to the (truthful) Swift Boat Vets ads. n nDid it get him an endorsement from the New York Times or Washington Post? Did it even earn him fair treatment from them? n nNope.
Clearly, Romney is more of a businessman than a politician. That's why he makes so many "gaffes", which are defined as truths accidentally uttered by politicians. That may cost him the election, but it's not clear to me if anything will be accomplished over the next four years anyway, given the fact that nobody is yet taking the debt crisis seriously enough. By 2016, we will be in crisis mode with $20+ trillion in debt and downgraded US sovereign debt rating. Then it will finally become clear that the Democrats have no plan and Republican young Turks, as opposed to the present republican leadership, do. The Republicans will prevail. They have a very strong bench. Ryan, Rubio, Jindal, Walker, Christie, etc. The Dems have …..Debbie Wasserman Schultz! G-d help us! __ __