Commentary Magazine


Contentions

What’s Next if Assad Falls?

Bashar al-Assad increasingly appears on the ropes, unable to contain the violence his brutal regime unleashed. The government’s violence has not been indiscriminate but has sectarian cleansing overtones, as Sunni Arabs are forced from towns and villages which the minority though dominant Alawites hope to make their own.

Behind its rhetoric, the Obama administration hopes the Syria problem will simply resolve itself. If there was any move behind-the-scenes to stop the worst atrocities, this ended the moment a bomb went off in Syria’s national security headquarters. Deep down, the Obama team hopes a coup or an assassin’s bullet will head off the need for any action.

Assad’s fall, however, will mark the end of one chapter and the start of another that could be far bloodier in the region.

What could come next?

Expect a Radical Opposition: Whatever hopes are placed in the White House or the State Department on the Syrian National Council filling the vacuum are likely misplaced. They are an exile organization based in Istanbul and increasingly tainted by Turkish penetration; it seems the Turkish government hasn’t learned the lessons from its attempt to hijack opposition groups ahead of the Iraq war. The real influence on the ground will increasingly be with more radical factions, including al-Qaeda affiliates. The issue is not popularity and broad appeal, but rather the willingness to use unbelievable cruelty to seize power and repress opposition.

The Chemical Weapon Conundrum: The Syrian government now acknowledges what has been, for decades, an open secret: Syria has manufactured and possesses chemical weaponry. If the White House believes they can utilize SEAL Team 6 or other special forces to secure these, they are sorely mistaken. Securing chemical weapons is not just the matter of parachuting in and guarding a door for 24 hours, but can take days if not weeks. Just ask the intelligence teams which rushed to secure Libyan WMD in 2003 before the mercurial Muammar Qaddafi could change his mind. Simply put, the United States will be hard pressed to secure chemical weapons without a lengthy occupation. The United Nations will provide no solace: Just remember all that armament Hezbollah achieved under the UN nose. This raises the possibility that the unconventional munitions could fall quickly into al-Qaeda or Hezbollah hands.

The Flight of the Christians: If you think Iraqi or Egyptian Christians have had it rough in recent years, you ain’t seen nothing yet. The Christians are perhaps 10 percent of the country. As a strategy of sectarian survival, they have collectively been as pro-Assad as the Alawi community. And many Sunni Muslims resent them for it. Just as Islamist terrorists targeted churches in Baghdad, expect terrorists to target Christians in Damascus with the goal of pushing them out of Syria. Motivation may not only be religious but also economic. Many Christians have leveraged their political ties into business success, and dispossessed Sunni Muslims will figure that now is the time to redistribute the wealth.

Lebanon: So where will the Christians go? Many will flee into nearby Lebanon where those with greater foresight have already bought apartments and squirreled away money. Lebanon has always been a sectarian tinderbox, though. Whenever demography shifts, the communal relations fray. Renewed fighting is always just around the corner.

Kurdistan Redux: The Turks have long played a double game with Syria. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan was for Bashar al-Assad before he was against him. While Erdoğan has darkly warned of international action, he has resisted proposals to create a safe haven in northern Syria for the simple reason that perhaps 90 percent of Syrian Turks sympathize with the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), which has for almost three decades led a separatist insurgency inside Turkey. Turks fear that any safe haven will bring the region one step closer to a greater Kurdistan, of which what now is southeastern Turkey would form the core. In effect, yesterday Erbil, today Qamishli, and tomorrow Diyarbakir. Of course, the Turks are now between a rock and a hard place because, with Syrian government control evaporating along the frontiers, the PKK and its sympathizers may effectively get the safe haven they crave with or without Turkey.

Introducing Commentary Complete

6 Responses to “What’s Next if Assad Falls?”

  1. BDZ says:

    I have a prediction that I make with high confidence: If Assad falls, it will be touted as a masterstoke of Obama diplomacy and a victory for "soft power theory" and leading from behind, which will be recast as "working behind the scenes" Get ready for major foreign policy accolades.

    • BreadAlone says:

      That would be incredibly ironic, given that Assad would've been toppled forcibly by an internal forcible force (most ironic for any external force to claim victory of soft power then), but a situation's ironic nature does not even make it improbable per se. (What would make it even more ironic is that Bush can be credited with putting such yearnings into the hearts of those in the region.) n nHere I affirm your pessimism though as regards the bearers of news and narrative. Romney's foreign policy case should be based more on hitting Obama on such things as his "flexibility" comment (not that such is not substantive though), simply because such things are quite indefensible (to say nothing of how they even display Obama's view of the electorate). The defense constituency in the American electorate isn't large, and those not in it, and especially now, with everything done by Obama to be painted in an especially fair light by a not-especially informed media, aren't likely to have a correct assessment of his presidency on the matter. (On the other hand, Romney should hit Obama on the particulars as regards our economic woes, and should cut away Obama's biggest argument, that it is Bush's policies [and especially his tax policies!] that got us into our mess.)

  2. Empress_Trudy says:

    I'm thinking Iran will simply anschluss them. True they're not geographically contiguous but Iraq is practically an Iranian rump state and Kurdistan is a lawless wilderness. This will complete the arc of Iranian influence which stretches from the Mediterranean to Pakistan. Eventually placing Iranian nuclear tipped MRBM's on the Mediterranean cost of Syria should be interesting.

    • besht2003 says:

      well, once the fissiparous multi-ethnic/tribal/sectarian "nations" created in the puzzle palaces of Versailles, Paris, and London a century or so ago start to separate like a Frankenstein's monster sloughing off its artificially attached limbs–who is in the immediate neighborhood to osmotically permeate the membrane to assist the dissolving efforts of their fellow agents of influence is not a trivial factor in the eventual outcome. And the Sunni are coming in from those contiguous borders. Iran can't count on Pakistan.

  3. melvin polatnick says:

    The screams of 2 million Syrian Christians will not be ignored by Americans. The Sunnis will pay a heavy price if they spill one drop of blood from the followers of Jesus.

    • Hani Goc says:

      Non sense. you never cared for us christians in the middle east, never did and never will. nOh yeah? what are u going to do? send us pencils maybe to write how we are being massacred. n

Leave a Reply