Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Why Akin Didn’t and Won’t Drop Out

Today on the Mike Huckabee show (and again immediately following on Dana Loesch’s program), Rep. Todd Akin told Americans that he has no intention of dropping out of his Senate race. Akin caused a firestorm earlier this week after remarks about “legitimate rape” and pregnancy. Despite calls from every corner of the GOP establishment and Tea Party for Akin to step aside before the 5 p.m. central time deadline, Akin has refused.

Judging from Akin’s interview with Huckabee today, it doesn’t appear he fully comprehends why the level of outrage is where it is, nor does he grasp just how much anger he has instigated from across the political spectrum. Akin told Huckabee: “It does seem to be a little bit of an overreaction.” He explained that he misspoke “one word in one sentence in one day.”

How could Akin get the public sentiment so wrong with a bipartisan chorus as loud as the one is calling for him to step down? One likely explanation is who comprises his inner circle. In early January, Akin fired most of his senior staff (his campaign manager, finance director and a general consultant) and installed his son, Perry, as campaign manager. His wife also has “been a regular presence on the campaign trail since he was first elected to the Missouri State House in 1988″ (this quote unfortunately comes from a disgusting hit piece from the Daily Beast on Mrs. Akin). Those surrounding Akin on his campaign have a personal, vested interest in his remaining in the race, and are less able to see his remarks as objectively as a campaign strategist might if they were not directly related to the candidate.

While one withdrawal deadline is apparently 5 p.m. central today, Akin has as late as September 25 to remove himself from the ballot. Politico explains,

Republicans in Washington were watching nervously ahead of a 6 p.m. EDT deadline for Akin to leave the race so Missouri Republican leaders could easily pick a replacement. The process for dropping out after Tuesday evening becomes far more cumbersome: Akin would have to petition a court to get out of the race before Sept. 25.

It’s unlikely that Akin will suddenly come to his senses before that deadline either, perhaps barring a total financial collapse of his campaign, which is a distinct possibility. “About a dozen GOP senators were scheduled to co-host a fundraiser at the National Republican Senatorial Committee on Sept. 19, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, NRSC Chairman John Cornyn, Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl, Missouri Sen. Roy Blunt and tea party favorite Mike Lee of Utah. All have since backed out of the event, a Republican source told POLITICO.”

It became apparent yesterday, however, just how much of an uphill financial battle Akin would face and when Huckabee asked about the financial difficulties his campaign would face, Akin seemed to hold out hope for a large contingent of dedicated small donors to carry his campaign through to November. It would take an ad-buy with a budget the size of most small countries to undo the damage that Akin has done, and without any major financial backing, that looks to be an almost impossible battle. With Akin’s decision today to remain in the race, it appears Republicans may have lost hope for a majority in the Senate, and as Jonathan pointed out, a chance at defeating ObamaCare.

Introducing Commentary Complete

5 Responses to “Why Akin Didn’t and Won’t Drop Out”

  1. John Burke says:

    The guy is a nutcase. A quick look around the right-leaning blogs that have supported Tea Party primary candidates against "the establishment" shows a remarkable agreement that Akin should have got out. Even most commenters on these sites — as representative slice of potential small donors to conservatives as you can find — agree. He will have no money, no organization and in the end few votes. All I can say is, good riddance.

  2. Todd Akin's comments were not merely idiotic, politically. They offended women across the spectrum. They cost him 5000 votes. They will help re-elect Sen McCaskill. n nThey were idiotic scientifically — and this may be the most troubling aspect. n nHow could an educated man (if he is) possibly believe such nonsense? His notion, purportedly conveyed by "a doctor", that a woman can somehow 'shut down' a rape-induced pregnancy is laughable, false — and profoundly ignorant of human biology. n nAnd he is on the Science subcommittee of the House! n nWe will soon discover, no doubt, that he is also a Creationist who believes the earth is 6000 years old, and that man roamed freely with the dinosaurs. n nSuch anti-science know-nothings as Todd Akin have no place in our politics. They barely have a place in our superstitions. n n

    • daized79 says:

      Charles, there are many kinds of "science." There is, for instance, a huge difference between examining the world around us and trying to understand how it works versus using a historical record to extrapolate back in time and try to figure out how inherently unobservable events took place. Even those who might disagree with you about Creation and even the history of the world past 6,000 years ago, cannot disagree with you about observable science (to the extent it is observable). So we may not know why raped women can get pregnant, but they do, magic secretions aside. My point is that there are many Creationists, yet there are only a handful of quacks who would say the nonsensical thing that Akin said. Creationism at its most extreme only says that back past a certain time, if G-d intervened in the otheriwse natural world, scientific research and theorizing is unable to accurately inform us of things prior to that date. At its least extreme, it just means that even though the world is x billion years old, G-d steered everthing to happen the way it did to create us. You needn't paint with so broad a brush.

    • daized79 says:

      That said, yes, he should be out, and yes, it's scary he's on a Science subcommittee (except that i don't really know what a Science subcommittee does or why we need one). Worse, as far as I can tell he just lied that a doctor told him that. Please produce the doctor. And strip him of his license (I'm sexist — it can't be a woman). And he thinks his only mistake was calling it "legitimate rape" instead of "forcible rape." Which makes it sounds as if he still thinks there are magic secretions (but of course why would this suddenly change because of public outrage?). Although he also confusingly said that he has two daughters and of course people get pregnant from rape. Whatever.

  3. He is trying to save his congressional seat, the democrats have information that will thoroughly disgrace him and will sit on it if he gets the stupid blond another 6 years. He is being blackmailed and deserves it. The republicans should expose him and make him retire in disgrace.

Leave a Reply