Commentary Magazine


Contentions

J Street’s Victory Lap

J Street backed 71 candidates in last month’s election. Sixty-nine of the candidates won. In July, the group issued a statement supporting the latest round of Iran sanctions legislation. The bill passed the Senate by unanimous consent the next day.

To hear J Street and supporters tell it, these are signs its influence is growing.

“This is an incredible victory,” wrote J Street in a November 7 press release. “One that is part of transforming the political atmosphere around Israel in the U.S. that has blocked meaningful American efforts to achieve a two-state solution for decades.”

There’s actually a less dramatic explanation for J Street’s supposed “victories.” After years of getting crushed by AIPAC in the lobbying game, J Street may have found success in the old adage, “if you can’t beat ’em, join ’em.” The group has started endorsing some sure winners, and then claiming credit when the inevitable happens.

As Steve Rosen pointed out at Foreign Policy, many of the candidates J Street endorsed were also backed and more heavily financed by AIPAC-associated PACs. The same goes for last summer’s Iran sanctions legislation. Both parties in congress overwhelmingly support tough sanctions, as does President Obama (at least publicly). 

So how can we know know if J Street’s clout on the Hill has actually grown, or if it’s just piggybacking off of already-popular candidates and bills? Well, the latest positions J Street has taken are worth keeping an eye on. It’s opposing any congressional response to the Palestinian UN declaration, and any efforts to sanction the PLO mission in Washington.

Several lawmakers have already proposed action against the Palestinian Authority. But what about the members of Congress J Street said it helped get elected? Will they object to these proposals, and support the J Street position? Or did J Street’s “incredible victory” end on election day?

Introducing Commentary Complete

8 Responses to “J Street’s Victory Lap”

  1. Empress_Trudy says:

    The Democratic party will expel its own Jews soon so J-Street will finally be able to come clean they're an Iranian front.

  2. Davidthomson1 says:

    J-Street victories are rather easy to accomplish because most American Jews are primarily interested in supporting abortion and gay marriage. This group simply has to piggyback on these issues and victory is usually guaranteed.

    • mhloutbeltway says:

      A sad statement but essentially true. I would also add favoring the appointment of leftist federal court judges who will also oppose prayer in schools and public places. This also explains the widespread visceral fear and loathing by most secular Jews of evangelical Christians, despite the latter's unequaled political support for Israel.

      • Davidthomson1 says:

        Jews are not the only ones who placed a much higher value on abortion and gay marriage. Many secular non-Jews also voted for political candidates who have hurt their own pocket books and foreign policy interests.

  3. ldubinsky says:

    how very odd, Alana, that J Street,, that group fiendishly and tirelessly working to desroy Israel, would find it mete to endorse candidates that AIPAC endorses. n ncould it be that AIPAC, as the Empress Methyl might slurringly say, is a front for Iranians? n

  4. Dave54321 says:

    That's pretty pathetic.

  5. S says:

    Sad to see, but J-Street was successful – the amendment was not added.

Leave a Reply