The New York Times has an amusing article today about how Madeleine Albright, Wesley Clark, and other former Clinton administration officials and generals are trying to cash in in Kosovo, which American intervention rescued from Serbian oppression. As a result of the Clinton administration’s actions, Kosovo has become one of the most pro-American places in the world with streets named after both Bill Clinton and Bob Dole and a statue of Clinton in the capital, Pristina.
What are the odds, I wonder, that there will be any similar outpouring of pro-American affection in Syria where, instead of intervening, the Obama administration is standing by even as the death toll climbs north of 45,000? The administration has now recognized a rebel government and blacklisted the Al Nusra Front as a terrorist organization but these small, symbolic steps are hardly leading to an outpouring of affection for Uncle Sam. Far from it. Indeed, as another Times article reports:
A growing number of anti-government groups — including fighters in the loose-knit Free Syrian Army that the United States is trying to bolster — have signed petitions or posted statements online in recent days expressing support for the Nusra Front. In keeping with a tradition throughout the uprising of choosing themes for Friday protests, the biggest day for demonstrations because it coincides with Friday Prayer, many called for this Friday’s title to be “No to American intervention — we are all Jabhet al-Nusra.”
These groups are rallying to the Al Nusra Front not because they like it–many of the other rebels hate the jihadist extremists who are intent on hijacking their struggle for freedom. But they are also pragmatic enough to know that the jihadists are fighting hard against Bashar Assad while the U.S. does nothing to help.
The administration’s stance would be akin to the Roosevelt administration in 1942 designating the NKVD as a terrorist organization and refusing to cooperate with Stalin. FDR was shrewder than that–he realized that, for all his dislike of Communism, sometimes the enemy of your enemy is your friend, at least temporarily. That is something that the current Democratic president does not seem to grasp.
American should not get involved in Syria. The rebels are too often Islamic extremists. They will have enormous power if Assad falls. We don't have a dog in this fight.
When the US leads from behind, they hand Al-Qaida the reigns.
The key difference is that Kosovo isn't really a functioning place. It's a principality owned and operated by the UN and NATO which have the ability and power to usurp any law they like and enforce any degree that suits them under UN 1244. Even after their declaration of independence in 2008 there's no consensus. But if something like that could be enacted over Syria, then it might work. At less than 9% of the population of Syria though it's far more manageable. Particularly since they want to be away from Serbia, not take it over and kill them all.
"The administrations stance would be akin to the Roosevelt administration in 1942 designating the NKVD as a terrorist organization and refusing to cooperate with Stalin. FDR was shrewder than that – he realized that, for all his dislike of Communism, sometimes the enemy of your enemy is your friend, at least temporarily." n nIt seems that this sentiment would apply equally to Assad. That's what Mr. Boot doesn't seem to grasp.