Over the course of the last year, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made a series of decisions that took what seemed like an unassailable political position and turned into a shaky re-election. He choose to make an alliance with the faltering Kadima Party that soon unraveled rather than seek early an election in the fall of 2012 when he was at his strongest. His public grandstanding about President Obama’s stance on Iran and the slights he received from the White House was interpreted as an intervention in the U.S. election on behalf of Mitt Romney that did neither the Republican nor the prime minister any good. Then he merged his Likud Party with Avigdor Lieberman’s Yisrael Beitenu Party prior to the January Knesset election that served only to drive secular voters into the arms of upstart Yair Lapid’s Yesh Atid.
Given the paucity of credible opponents for the office of prime minister and the collapse of Israel’s political left none of this was enough to cost Netanyahu the election but the Likud’s haul of Knesset seats was less than he might have gotten a few months earlier had he avoided these mistakes. But as the PM conducts the negotiations to form a new government, it may be that he is about to commit another blunder. Though one should take any of the reports leaking out of the talks between the Israeli parties with more than a few grains of salt, right now it looks as if Netanyahu is on the verge of outsmarting himself again and setting up the Likud for a potential electoral disaster at the next election.
According to Haaretz, the first Israeli Party to accept Netanyahu’s invitation to join his government is something of a surprise: Tzipi Livni’s Hatnuah. Livni, a longtime Netanyahu antagonist who ran as a critic of the Likud’s stance on the peace process did poorly at the polls getting only six seats. But Netanyahu has nevertheless rewarded her with the post of Justice minister and leadership of peace negotiations with the Palestinians. In of itself that might not be such a dumb idea. Livni is desperate for office and sticking her with the thankless of job of negotiating with Mahmoud Abbas is setting her up for certain failure. But the problem here is that this seems to be part of a scheme to assemble a coalition involving the ultra-Orthodox Parties that is designed to marginalize Lapid as well as Naftali Bennett, the prime minister’s potent rival on his right who also came out of the voting a winner.
As Haaretz details, Netanyahu’s plan seems to be to create a 57-seat bloc without either Lapid or Bennett which will leave both the choice of joining the Cabinet on Netanyahu’s terms or being left in the cold. That would seem to be a clever way of cutting Lapid and Bennett down to size as well as to avoid pressure to adopt a far reaching plan to change the draft system to ensure the conscription of the ultra-Orthodox the same as other Israelis. It would give him a government that would offer cover on the peace process with the Americans while making sure that neither Lapid nor Bennett could topple him.
But if that is Netanyahu’s goal, he is missing a historic opportunity as well as sowing the seeds for defeat the next time Israelis vote.
The January vote presented the prime minister with the chance to do what had eluded every previous Israeli government: fix the Haredi draft problem. The combined strength of Likud, Yesh Atid and Bennett’s Habayit Hayehudi would ensure a solid majority that would easily be joined by smaller parties that would support a program of draft change and maybe even make election reform possible. That would enrage the two ultra-Orthodox Parties Shas and United Torah Judaism but they would be powerless to stop the measure. But Netanyahu seems to be more bothered by the prospect of an alliance with Lapid and Bennett — both of whom are feeling their oats since the election — than the prospect of allying himself again with the dead weight of the Haredim or even Livni.
Four years ago, it was Livni and her then powerful Kadima faction (it won 28 seats then but was whittled down to 2 under Livni’s successor) that passed up the opportunity to do something about the draft when her wounded pride prevented an alliance with Likud. But if he chooses to embrace Shas and UTJ at the expense of Lapid, this time it will be Bibi who will be blamed for another Haredi victory that will be deeply resented by most Israeli voters.
Even more dangerous for Netanyahu is the prospect that Lapid will be smart enough to stay out of a government in which Shas and UTJ will be able to veto draft reform. The prime minister appears to resent Lapid’s boasts that he will build on his 2013 success and be elected prime minister the next time around. But it looks as though he fails to understand that the surest path to that result will be to keep Lapid out of the cabinet rather than welcoming him into it.
Many independent centrists running on platforms calling for drafting the Haredim have done well in Israeli elections before. But all succumbed to the siren call of government office and were then co-opted by their major party rivals. The only way for Lapid to avoid that fate is precisely by not making the same mistake. The formula for election victory for any of those who hope to replace Netanyahu at the next election is to stay out of the Cabinet and to help lead the opposition to the prime minister. That’s something that the Labor Party’s Shelly Yacimovich seems to understand even better than Lapid.
It may be that before the negotiating is done, Netanyahu will have abandoned his ultra-Orthodox allies and swallowed his pride and have done a deal with Lapid and Bennett that will be good for his country and his political future. But if not, we may look back on what is going on this week in Israel as one more example of Netanyahu being too clever by half and setting the stage for his political undoing.










Shas and Degel HaTorah are two movement parties that offer a measure of social cohesion and flexibility vis a vis diplomacy or diplomatic retrenchment and chiloni-dati stability (even with their not outsize mandate). Although there is a case (and legal requirement now) for reconsidering national service options doing so at the behest of Bennett and Lapid, two would be charismatic opportunists. is foolhardy. Inside the coalition, on their own terms as a prefab faction, they will tag-team whipsaw Bibi hitting, not necessarily consistently ideologically, on the wedge fractures of the Likud base–today it will be to draft harediim, the day after to change the ground rules for IDF administrative control in the shetachiim, next week to give nationalist camp rabbis greater autonomy in their communities, two weeks down the road to clip the wings of the religious authorities over marriage and conversion. n nThe initiatives won't always parse and would be awkward coming from either Lapid or Bennett alone–baton tossing however could make Bibi's life miserable. Better to wait them out. n nIs the IDF itself demanding that it's manpower requirements can only be met by raiding the yeshivas? n nBut no, Lapid's evident preference so far is not to take a principled opt-out of the coalition but to use Bibi's shoulders as a stepping stone. But sure, let him cool his made for TV persona in the back benches. So far, not what he wants.
Actually I see this as a way to keep out shas and degel hatorah. They will not join a coalition with Livni and she will not join a coalition with them. This is a way for netanyahu to keep Bennet and lapid at bay both of whom think because of their wins they are PM instead of him. What this means is that social issues and not the "peace process' is upper most in the minds of Israelis. They know it is nonsense that Obama is going to push the peace process so Netanyahu sends in Livni. Who by the way can do nothing without the PM's and the cabinet's OK. In the end Israel will do what every realist said in the first place…annex area C and the settlement blocs, withdraw entirely from the Palestinian areas and leave them to their own self-destructive tendencies. It is a shame that everyone keeps trying to downplay Livni. I dont' t like her actions as a politician but she it is a shame that people try to paint her as stupid. She is anything but. She is also an Israeli patriot who spent years in the Mossad. Dont' forget too that if she and Netanyahu are wrong it is their children that will die not ours here in the USA. n nThe reality is that you are going to see a coalition with Livni, Bennet and Lapid, OK maybe not Bennet. The emphasis will be on social issues, housing, civil marriage, and heredi army or national service. You will also see a movement away from giving the orthodox control over education funds and immigration. You will see more of an acceptance of the reform and conservative movements and women may not be arrested for wearing talit at the Kotel. Israel has to grow up too some day and recognize the rest of the Jewish world if it wants to be relevant in every Jew's life. (anyway this is my hope)
By the time this is over I believe that Jewish Home will end up joining the government.; that is what he is trying to do, in my opinion. A 57 seat coalition will probably not last 12 months.
Netanyahu's freakish coalition with Hatnuah and Labor on one end, and Shas and UTJ on the other will collapse in 12-18 months max; after the next election Yesh Atid and Habayit Hayehudi will have 45 seats between them; and the coalition with smaller Likud then led by Feiglin will have a stable government with Lapid as PM, Bennett as FM and Feglin at defense.
Lapid-Bennett's marriage is of convenience. The secular base of Lapid is not interested in having a permanent arrangement with the NRP religous nationalist block anchoring Jewish Home in Yesha. That isn't Tel Aviv's notion of Zionism. The Yesh Atid-JH alliance is as contradictory and freakish as any of the past present and future combos. Bibi is putting together an "Establishment" coalition, plus three of the parties are Likud or Likud spin-offs.