I want to add to what Jonathan wrote about Bob Woodward calling out the White House for misrepresenting its role in sequestration and “moving the goalposts” in order to get its way.
Mr. Woodward is clearly sympathetic to President Obama’s approach; he’s said as much. (“Obama’s call for a balanced approach is reasonable,” Woodward writes, “and he makes a strong case that those in the top income brackets could and should pay more.”) But Woodward has enough integrity as a journalist not to allow a willful distortion to go unchecked and unchallenged.
Many in the elite media–NBC’s Chuck Todd prominently among them—have made a concerted effort to downplay the role of paternity when it comes to the sequestration idea. (Todd declared, “Of all the dumb things Washington does, this ‘who started it’ argument has proven to be one of the dumber ones, especially since we’re so close to the actual cuts going into place.”)
But this is a ludicrous position. Any journalist worth his salt must know that for a president to eviscerate a “brutal” idea that his own White House championed and that the president himself approved of is a big story. And you can be sure Chuck Todd would think so, and treat it as such, if the president was George W. Bush or Ronald Reagan instead of Barack Obama.
In any event, we only know about the White House’s role because of Woodward’s book The Price of Politics. And now Woodward himself is holding the White House accountable for disfiguring the truth.
I don’t always agree with Mr. Woodward’s judgments, and I’ve expressed those differences publicly. I’m also aware of the fact that it’s fashionable among some, including some conservatives, to disparage Woodward. But the truth is that he’s a monumentally important figure in the history of journalism. His books have genuine historical value. He’s not afraid to take on either Republican or Democratic presidents. And whatever his own political views are, he is first and foremost a reporter, and an awfully good one. Which he’s showed once again, in this most recent dust-up with the White House.
Todd declared, “Of all the dumb things Washington does, this ‘who started it’ argument has proven to be one of the dumber ones. n nOr as Hillary put it: “What difference does it make?!?” n nAll of this is about where does the responsibility for the mess lie. When the rhetorical response is: “who cares?”, the actual answer is: the Liberal Democrats. When the actual answer is Republicans or Conservatives, there is no end to the righteous indignation. n nThat pretty much sums up the endemic situation in DC. n
"…a concerted effort to downplay the role of paternity when it comes to the sequestration idea." n nYes, it was forced on the GOP like Barney Frank forced banks to write bad loans.
As a matter of fact Hillel, Frank is one who must take responsibility for that coercion.
This is how far our nation has fallen. Mr. Wehner praises Mr. Woodard, a journalist, for telling the truth. What's next, praise for a judge who is impartial? Good grief. n nWhile Mr. Wehner's post is fine, we would do ourselves a favor to remember that journalists are supposed to tell the truth. They are suppose to report news without bias and without prejudice. Yet, our media today is so slanted, so unashamedly liberal in thought and action, that conservatives have to comfort themselves that there is a journalist somewhere who has the integrity to report truthfully. n n Let's hope it doesn't get so bad that we one day thank our physicians for not killing us. Oh wait, ObamaCare is coming soon.
Hoorah for Woodward that he finally got off his kneepads long enough to look around and see what Obama was doing. Give the man a medal.