Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Why a Dim-Witted Defense Secretary Matters

Much has been said, and rightly so, about Chuck Hagel’s dismal confirmation hearing, his noxious statements about Israel, his alarming attitude toward Iran, and his eagerness to gut the Defense Department.

But what Dan Senor has done better than anyone else is to explain, in a specific and accessible manner, what a secretary of defense does, what the job entails, and why competence in that Cabinet post, more than any other, matters. Mr. Senor’s article in the Weekly Standard can be found here

In the wake of Senator Hagel’s dim-witted performance in his confirmation hearing, his supporters were forced to argue that Hagel is acceptable precisely because he won’t really be in charge. “After all,” said Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal, “the president is the one who sets policy.” Mr. Hagel himself, in order to allay concerns of his critics, actually said, “I won’t be in a policy-making position.”

Except that he will–and Senor explains all that this means.

In his conclusion, Senor writes:

The most that can be said in favor of Chuck Hagel’s nomination is that his hands will be tied, that he won’t have much scope to affect policy. But no one should be under any illusions: If Chuck Hagel becomes secretary of defense, he will be captain of the Pentagon ship, choosing its crew and charting its course. The decisions he makes on the job will have tremendous consequences for the wars America fights today, and perhaps an even greater impact on the wars which America might fight in the future. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, like every secretary of defense before him, will be a consequential policymaker, for better or for worse.

If Hagel is confirmed it will be, in every important respect, for worse.

These are not going to be easy years for America.

Introducing Commentary Complete

7 Responses to “Why a Dim-Witted Defense Secretary Matters”

  1. Ed_Zuckerbrod says:

    Welcome to the age of "What difference does it make?"

  2. David S. Levine says:

    Both the Democ-rat Party senators of Jewish origin and the mainstream Jewish organizations must be held to account on this, but they won’t be. The organizations, ADL. both AJCs, AIPAC and the B’nal B’rith are nothing more than tials on the Democ-rat party kite and they show it every day. From the minute this president was sworn in he has shown total hostility to Israel but the organizations, Democ-rat senators and Democ-rat congressmen remained silent. Now they are taking the “affirmative action” of supporting the confirmation of someone actively hostile to Israel and the Jewish people. All three sets, by their actions and inactions are the scum of the earth and the “Not One Nickel’ rule should be applied to them when they ask for contributions. Use the business reply envelopes to tell them off when the appeals arrive.

  3. ldubinsky says:

    always great to hear a second-rate hack propagandist describe some other person as dim-witted.

    • dcdoc1 says:

      Can always count on ldubinsky for the intelligent, substantive contribution to the conversation. (You aren't being disingenuous, are you, pretending to be a person of the left when you are in fact a person of the right trying to make the left look worse than they are?)

      • ldubinsky says:

        you want an example of disingenuousness, try reading Wehner's NYT early 2008 essay praising Obama and his candidacy

    • davlevine says:

      ldubinski must have been looking in the mirror when he wrote about "second rate hack propagandists."

      • ldubinsky says:

        I don't write opinions and speeches in the employ of others and my writing is of insufficient quality to merit even second rate, levine, but thanks.

Leave a Reply