Give credit where it’s due: the Obama administration deserves praise for pursuing a hardline policy against North Korea–in fact a harder line than the Bush administration policy, at least in Bush’s second term.
In 2008, recall, the Bush administration–thanks to the misguided efforts of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and negotiator Chris Hill–announced an accord to lift some economic sanctions on North Korea and remove it from the list of state sponsors of terrorism in return for unbelievable, and quickly abandoned, promises from Pyongyang to abandon its nuclear program. This was widely seen as a bid–similar to the ill-advised Annapolis conference she convened in an attempt to achieve a breakthrough in Israeli-Palestinian negotiations–by Rice to land herself a Nobel Prize, or at least rack up some notable achievement, before she left office.
Perhaps, then, it’s a good thing that Obama already got his Nobel because he doesn’t seem to feel compelled to engage in pointless outreach with North Korea. Instead, he continues to ratchet up sanctions and has even managed to get Chinese support at the United Nations for the latest round of sanctions. The fact that the North Korean regime is threatening in retaliation to erase the Korean War armistice and launch a preemptive nuclear attack on the U.S. is a sign that it is feeling the pressure.
The North Korean threats should not be taken lightly–as the sinking of a South Korean ship by a North Korean submarine in 2010 demonstrated, the North is capable of lashing out in unpredictable and deadly ways. But nor should the North’s threats deter its neighbors from continuing to increase the pressure on this criminal regime.
At the end of the day, third-generation dictator Kim Jong-un is not suicidal: He knows that launching an attack on the United States or a major assault on South Korea will result in the end of his regime. Nuclear weapons or not, North Korea’s antiquated military could not long survive a South Korean-American military offensive. Like his father and grandfather, Kim is only trying to gain concessions from the West by threatening us.
Obama deserves credit for hanging tough in the face of these continued North Korean provocations.
"achieve a breakthrough in Israeli-Palestinian negotiations". A continuing disaster for those who pressure Israel for this so-called breakthrough. Where are the sanctions on the Arabs? Particularly on the so-called Palestinians. The Arab tyrants, most certainly their clergy, keep using Jews and Israel as a punching bag distraction. They possibly could begin to relish peace if the rewards for their violence were removed and replaced with sanctions such as Iran and N. Korea deserve and get.
Good article. The left is seething, seeing Obama being influenced by conservative advisors on this point.
LMAO!!! Boot, take a quarter and buy a clue. Obama will do nothing about North Korea and Pyongyang knows that. That's why they made the threat in the first place. Obama's response sounded like Qaddafi. If anybody does anything about North Korea, it will be South Korea and/or China. Obama will be too busy emptying Federal prisons like his other hero Saddam Hussein and blaming the Oquester on Republicans, even though he wrote it.
It is a credit to President Obama that Chinese supported sanctions with advisement to stay from provocations to all sides. I am just wondering what is stay from provocations means to North Korea. Is sinking a South Korean ship a provocation? Is shelling a South Korean territory a provocation? Is threading USA with preemptive nuclear attack a provocation? I am wondering if Mexico did the same to USA what will be a response. We would probably get together with Canada and other South American nations to discussed sanctions against Mexico. Unfortunately, sanctions never work. It didn’t work with League of Nations or United Nations. It is actions not sanctions stop aggression.