Commentary Magazine


Contentions

American Military Retrenchment and Nuclear Proliferation

The New York Times had a fascinating article on the latest Korean crisis the other day which noted that two-thirds of South Koreans now support developing their own nuclear deterrent–a radical idea for a nation that has been such a close American ally for decades but one that is gaining strength among some foreign policy elites. Significantly, it is not just the increasingly shrill line from Pyongyang which is causing alarm in the South. There are also doubts about the reliability of the U.S. as a protector. The Times notes

Beyond the immediate fear of a military provocation, analysts say deeper anxieties are also at work in the South. One of the biggest is the creeping resurgence of old fears about the reliability of this nation’s longtime protector, the United States. Experts say the talk of South Korea’s acquiring nuclear weapons is an oblique way to voice the concerns of a small but growing number of South Koreans that the United States, either because of budget cuts or a lack of will, may one day no longer act as the South’s ultimate insurance policy.

That is a powerful testament to the growing doubts around the world about American power in the Age of Obama–even if the South Koreans and others would not put it that way. Surveys show widespread global admiration for Obama, but there is growing discomfort with the “lead from behind” doctrine that has come to be associated with his administration. Those doubts are only amplified by the sequester, which Obama dreamed up and has allowed to go into effect, thereby jeopardizing our military strength, because of his unwillingness to reach agreement with Republicans over any deficit deal that does not raise taxes.

It is not just South Koreans and other Asian allies who wonder if the U.S. will be there for them as they are threatened by North Korea–or by a China that is growing increasingly assertive in trying to expand it sovereignty over various islands claimed by Japan, the Philippines, Taiwan, and other nations with little pushback from Washington. So, too, Middle Eastern allies worry as they see Washington failing to stop the Iranian nuclear program or to do more to stop Iran’s allies in Syria from trying to defeat a popular uprising using horrific violence.

So far those doubts are muted, but if present trends continue they will get louder over time–and we will see the world becoming a more dangerous place. Not just because American power serves to restrain our enemies but also because it restrains our allies–especially countries such as Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia, who could easily go nuclear if they choose. They have decided, thus far, to refrain from fielding their own nuclear arsenals because they have been sheltered under the American nuclear umbrella. But if that umbrella frays–because of nuclear cuts that Obama is trying to implement or because of a general weakening of our defense or simply a decline in our credibility–then they will do what they have to do to protect themselves and the world will become a much more dangerous place as nuclear arms races break out in the Middle East and East Asia.

Introducing Commentary Complete

3 Responses to “American Military Retrenchment and Nuclear Proliferation”

  1. MGray38 says:

    The genie in the bottle and China and North Korea's worst nightmare is the ongoing re-militarization of Japan. Japanese development of a nuclear weapon, likely plutonium based, is fully within their capacity if they have not already done so secretly. The new Prime Minister of Japan is fully in synch with the Japanese military which has been openly expanding their capacity for the past five years to not merely defend Japan but undertake "overseas operations". The withdrawal of the U.S. Marine air wings and ground troops from Okinowa to Guam which will take place on schedule over the next 3 – 5 years will remove any bar from further Japanese need and desire to fully re-militarize. This is not to minimize the impact of South Korea acquiring a nuclear weapon, but it pales by comparison to similar Japanese actions.

  2. watsa46 says:

    It looks like Pr. O has a tribal view of the world and US potentials for greatness. The world had great expectations and he failed most expectations. Perhaps people were full of wishful thinking after all.

  3. Tazzerman2000 says:

    The article was interesting. Of course, having 1.5+ million soldiers and hoards of artillery/tanks locked and loaded just over the DMZ, all pointed in your direction, would make anybody a little skittish and looking around to see who your friends are. n nWhile I certainly do NOT like the prospect of a nuclear armed DPRK, I think it MUCH more likely that the N. Koreans would start lobbing shells over, along with a possible across the 38th 'adventure' of some sort on their part, just to 'test' the waters so to speak. They may be bat-shit crazy but they're NOT stupid. They've seen what our responses have been to the various 'crisis' around the globe and I have NO doubt that they've taken the 'measure of the man' and regard POTUS as a paper tiger at best. n nThe question I have is simple: what would Barry do in response to an ACTUAL provocation of this sort? n nOh wait, I know….. Ready…..Set…. Engage….. the U.N. who would of course issue yet another STRONGLY worded statement condemning the action. Barry baby would then have another opportunity to lead from behind. n nMark my words, the NORKS are going to push this as far as they can. They see an opportunity to, if nothing else, humiliate the U.S.. while at the same time, sow the seeds of uncertainty and doubt in the various relationships we have with Japan, S. Korea, China et. al. n nIt seems to already be working…

Leave a Reply