Commentary Magazine


Contentions

The Next Fed Chairman

The chairman of the Federal Reserve is, arguably, the second most powerful office in Washington. So who gets to occupy that office is always subject to politics and fierce lobbying. But since the Democratic Party holds the White House and the Senate, the arguments over whom to appoint are not about fiscal policy or basic economic philosophy, they’re about what sex the next chairman should be.

There has never been a female Fed chairman and so, feminists argue, the next one must be. Personally I wonder when, if ever, this first-X-to-be-Y obsession of the left (and journalists, but I repeat myself) will end. It is more than abundantly clear that one’s gender, ethnic background, race, etc. are no longer any impediment to gaining high political (or corporate) office. But I suspect that twenty years from now there will still be breathless headlines heralding the appointment—for the first time in history!—of a left-handed gay former dentist of Lithuanian descent to the office of third assistant deputy undersecretary of homeland security.

The feminist wing of the party wants Janet Yellen, currently the vice chairman of the Fed’s board and former president of the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank. The Wall Street wing of the party, led by Robert Rubin, wants Lawrence Summers, former secretary of the treasury under Bill Clinton and former director of the National Economic Council under Barack Obama. Both have had distinguished careers as economics professors. In other words, both have first-class résumés for the job.

And there is not a whole lot of difference between them in terms of policy. Yellen has never met a monetary stimulus she didn’t like, and that would make Wall Street nervous. Summers is currently a consultant at Citibank (where Democratic financial politicians wait out their occasional exiles from Washington) but is hardly a fiscal conservative. Neither is likely to place a priority on getting the Fed out of the stimulus game and back to maintaining price stability.

The Wall Street Journal is not terribly impressed with either candidate. The New York Times (are you sitting down?) prefers the more liberal Janet Yellen. But, except to the gender-obsessed, it won’t make a lot of difference which one wins this fight.


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.