Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Obama’s Call for Action–and Inaction

It’s hardly surprising that, given the incoherence of President Obama’s Syria policy, his prime time address to the nation on the subject made so little sense.

The first part of the speech was the kind of rousing call for action that a commander in chief would deliver right after the first bombs are falling on Damascus. Said the president: “When dictators commit atrocities, they depend upon the world to look the other way until those horrifying pictures fade from memory, but these things happened. The facts cannot be denied. The question now is what the United States of America and the international community is prepared to do about it, because what happened to those people — to those children — is not only a violation of international law, it’s also a danger to our security.”

He then proceeded to swat away one objection after another to the use of force. But here was the kicker: the bombs are not falling, nor are they likely to.

Obama concluded, in a section obviously tacked onto remarks that were no doubt already written before the events of the last 24 hours, that there are “encouraging signs” that Syria will give up its chemical weapons as part of a deal brokered by Russia. His conclusion: “I have therefore asked the leaders of Congress to postpone a vote to authorize the use of force while we pursue this diplomatic path.”

In short, the speech was a rousing call to action followed by a call for inaction–a.k.a. the “diplomatic path” which apparently, as per Moscow, does not include making credible threats of force against Assad should he fail to disarm. Obama did not even demand that Congress pass a resolution authorizing military action if the current talks don’t pan out–he simply told Congress to cool it while Putin works his magic.

What, one wonders, was the point of the speech? Was it simply that the White House had already booked the TV time and wanted to carry on regardless of the facts? Or does Obama imagine that his stern words will cow Assad into compliance even as it is obvious that opposition in Congress will not allow air strikes?

This simply makes no sense. But then neither does anything that Obama has done on Syria recently.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.