Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Jon Stewart’s Moral Lunacy

In the past I’ve praised Jon Stewart, a liberal, for being an outstanding comedian and satirist. I watch his program and, despite being a conservative, I generally count myself a fan of it. But for Stewart’s political humor to work, it has to have some basis in reality. He has to have identify a real-world absurdity in order to mock it. Which is why Stewart’s recent segment on Israel and Hamas was unfunny, not the least bit clever, and even irresponsible (a point I’ll return to in a moment).

Mr. Stewart asserted that both sides–Israel and Hamas–are engaging in aerial bombardment. But because Israel is more effective at prosecuting the war, and because more Palestinians than Israelis are dying, Israel is the more guilty party. It’s framed as an example of moral equivalence, but with Israel more morally culpable because of the “asymmetric” nature of the conflict.

This is moral lunacy.

You would never know from watching Stewart that Hamas is dedicated to the destruction of the Jewish state (and says so in its charter); that Hamas started the war; that Hamas wants to escalate the war; that Hamas has refused repeated ceasefires; and that Hamas is using innocent Palestinians as human shields by, for example, using hospitals and schools for military purposes. You would never know, in other words, that Hamas has a vested interest in more dead Palestinians, precisely in the hopes that people like Jon Stewart will make Israel out to be the more malicious of the two combatants. And when Stewart ridicules Israel for warning Palestinians to evacuate before the IDF strikes military targets in Gaza–”Evacuate to where!?”–he is displaying (at best) an embarrassing ignorance. Israel actually drops leaflets with maps indicating where residents of Gaza can go–specific sites–where they’ll be unharmed. So Israel is instructing Gazans to leave dangerous combat zones. And what about Hamas? It’s urging Gazans to stay. Why? In order for them to be killed.

Mr. Stewart, whenever he’s confronted with his errors and misleading segments, will invoke the excuse that he’s merely a comedian, so it’s absurd to judge him in the fashion we judge political commentators. Except that he’s not “merely” a comedian, and he knows it. Mr. Stewart actually has a fair amount of influence on our politics. Members of the political class have their thinking, and even their reporting, shaped by what he says. He is, for many of them, a moral conscience of sorts. Jon Stewart knows it, and he takes advantage of it. He uses his humor to advance his ideology, to give voice to his political and moral beliefs.

Now it’s true enough that Stewart is a comedian before he’s a political commentator. But to say he’s more one than the other isn’t to say he’s simply one or the other. He’s a comedian who often uses comedy to make political comment. And so Stewart should be held accountable, at least within reason, for what he says and what he does.

In this instance, Stewart committed two mistakes. He wasn’t funny, and in the process he showed himself to be a moral fool.


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »


7 Responses to “Jon Stewart’s Moral Lunacy”

  1. ROMAN SZEREMETA says:

    Report by CAMERA (the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America) contradicts media reports that tried to paint Israel’s Operation Protective Edge as indiscriminately killing civilians.
    http://www.algemeiner.com/2014/07/15/watchdog-al-jazeeras-gaza-fatalities-data-indicates-israel-killed-mostly-combatant-age-males-not-women-or-children/
    Points made:
    1. the fatalities are disproportionately among young males, which corresponds with the characteristics of combatants.
    2.only about 12 percent of the total fatalities are female, though females make up half the population.
    You can add my observation about the claim of indiscriminate bombing of children. Even though children represent more than 50% of the population, they account for only 20%-25% of the civilian casualties ie half of what one would expect.

  2. MANUEL LAZEROV says:

    Maybe one day he will get hijacked by reality. Maybe he should actually read the Hamas Charter to become enlightened.

    http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hamas.asp

    As Trotsky one said,”Maybe you don’t want war, but war wants you”. Something to keep in mind.

  3. HARRY BROWN says:

    John Stewart is not a comedian. And he is not a moral fool. He is a Leftist.

  4. ANDREA WIDBURG says:

    This post describes the struggles at least one Stewart fan had justifying his faith in Stewart’s “mature” wisdom: http://www.bookwormroom.com/2014/07/23/sol-giggleweed-tries-to-weigh-in-on-jon-stewarts-pro-israel-bona-fides-and-fails-spectacularly/

  5. TIKI SHAPIRA says:

    Usually those who give themselves the right to criticize others through ‘funny remarks & anecdotes, are mostly people who handle critic on their own perfect persona badly.

    Something to do with brains being to small for their ego!

  6. STANLEY E HONIG says:

    What a jerk. Why can’t Jon Stewart Liebowitz understand that those people would kill HIM if they had an opportunity. What denies them the opportunity is the very people he delights in satirizing.

    • JOE MAHONEY says:

      All too true, a policy of appeasement may work if the will to enforce and fight exist; if the policy is the result of irresolution and weakness it will fail.




Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.