Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Can the GOP Lower the Gender Gap?

Republican National Committee chair Reince Priebus had a point when in an appearance on MSNBC’s Daily Rundown, he pushed back at the story published by Politico in which the publication spun two webs that showed the GOP continuing to trail the Democrats among female voters as proof that it was “stuck in the past.” Though Priebus is right to note that the generally negative view of the Democrats held by women is nearly as bad as that of Republicans, there’s no denying that a gender gap exists. More to the point, there’s little use denying that it’s bound to get worse in 2016.

As Preibus noted, the internal polls conducted by two conservative PACs—Crossroads GPS and American Action Network—showed that 49 percent of women view Republicans negatively while 39 percent think the same of Democrats. That’s a clear gender gap and a big advantage for Democrats in any election. But the spin on the poll coming from Politico seemed to center on the notion that the GOP was hopelessly out of touch with most women who viewed them as insensitive to their issues. While carping about the characterization of his party, he acknowledged that the problem is serious and he also asserted that it was not insurmountable.

There are two conclusions to be drawn from this situation.

The first is that although the Democrats’ charge that Republicans are waging a “war on women” is the lowest kind of specious partisan propaganda, it has worked. Though married women still support Republicans, the problem for the GOP is that the far more numerous unmarried women have bought into the Democrats’ tactics, especially in the Middle West and Northeast.

Why? Because many young, liberal women have accepted the notion that conservative positions on economic issues and the need for smaller government hurts them. Moreover, to a generation of women who have come to believe the unfettered right to abortion and free contraception from their employers is essential to their well being, GOP arguments are bound to fall flat.

The second is that if Hillary Clinton is, as is likely, the Democratic Party’s presidential candidate, nothing Preibus and the Republicans do is likely to narrow the gender gap.

So should the GOP give up? No. But its expectations must be tempered by a knowledge that the Democratic advantage with the mainstream media and in the world of popular culture are going to make it very hard to erase their deficit until they find national candidates who can appeal to more women.

The RNC’s proposed response to the problem makes sense. It advocates seeking to “neutralize” Democratic arguments about “fairness” by pointing out that the best way to deal with inequality is to reform liberal big government programs that encourage the dependency that hurts poor families and women. It also correctly advises that the only way for a pro-life party to deal with abortion is to acknowledge the disagreement and then move on to other issues and to rely on the fact that many women have concerns about abortion and that even most supporters of it don’t view it as a litmus test issue. Yet if a GOP consultant quoted by Politico is right to say that many women view Republicans as the “old, white, right, out of touch” party, then it is necessary for the GOP to put forward younger, diverse candidates who can appeal to more voters.

That’s easier said than done, but it’s also just as obvious that what Republicans need to do is to recruit more female candidates. That’s something the party has done better in recent years and it can cite successes such as New Mexico’s Governor Susana Martinez, New Hampshire Senator Kelly Ayotte and Rep. Cathy McMorris Rogers from Washington to prove it. But, as with the need to get more visible Hispanics on the GOP line, the need for more female GOP leaders must become a priority rather than an afterthought.

For all of the negative poll numbers about women voters, Republicans need not be afraid of waging a war of ideas against a Democratic Party that has staked its future on returning to the failed liberal patent nostrums of the 1960s. But, as Preibus rightly pointed out, it is not enough to have good ideas. You’ve got to take them to the voters and articulate them in a way that can be understood and supported. Politics is, above all, a test of personalities, and until the voters start associating the GOP more with the likes of Martinez, Ayotte, and Rogers than with Mitch McConnell and John Boehner, they’re not likely to change their minds.

Which is why the impending lesson of 2016 ought to be concentrating the minds of Republicans on promoting conservative women to leadership positions in the years to come. Hillary Clinton’s presence at the top of the Democratic ticket is such a powerful symbol that it is bound to offset most of the GOP’s efforts to make headway with women. Yet that makes it all the more important for a party that already has a gender gap to ensure that Republican women aren’t tokens or outliers but equal partners in promoting conservative ideas.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »


3 Responses to “Can the GOP Lower the Gender Gap?”

  1. ROMAN SZEREMETA says:

    The “gender gap” in the 2012 Presidential election – which was carried out under Priebus’s watch – was 18%! Its now down to the level it was in the 2008 Presidential election!
    But hey, credit where credit is due. The GOP couldn’t have done it without the help of people like Todd Akin and the Tea Party – the 18% gender gap that is!
    All families have their share of kooks but unlike the GOP they usually keep them well hidden, they don’t give them leadership roles.
    Priebus lost the unlosable 2012 Senate race and is now fretting about the unwinnable 2016 Presidential race!
    Loser!

  2. DAVID PATTEN says:

    It would be a shame if the party adopted a milquetoast position on abortion just to make the Republican brand less off-putting to the segment of the female population that believes their well-being hinges on having unfettered access to abortion and free contraception. The Republican Party should show leadership on this issue rather than retreat. Not only is that the principled move, but it is the smart move politically. If women currently favor Democrats to Republicans by a 10 point margin, but women only favor abortion by about 1 or 2 percentage points, then there are a lot of pro-life women playing for the wrong team. The party should focus on winning them back, rather than trying to convince the War on Women crowd that abortion isn’t all that essential to the Republicans’ misogynist grand strategy anyway. Opposition to abortion is a winning stance. Americans consistently (and wildly) overestimate how pro-choice other Americans are. The truth is there are a lot of pro-abortion spokespeople out there right now saying some pretty insane things. A former communications director of Emily’s List, Janet Harris, scoffs at the idea that “terminating a pregnancy is a moral issue requiring ethical debate.” She then informs us that a fetus should not be mistaken for “a being.” This is why she can’t understand why pro-choice politicians always presume that a woman who opts for an abortion would agonize over her decision. She would prefer it if future talk about abortion dropped the presupposition that anything at all significant were at stake. Richard Dawkins thinks you are immoral if you fail to abort your defective kids. A recent pro-abortion Wired article casually discusses the benefits of women turning over their “breeding” decisions to the state. These views may seem like outliers, but they are mainstream in the pro-choice echo-chambers wherein the Democrats’ actual abortion policy is written. I believe that if voters – female voters included – could see and understand the brave new world progressive leaders want to take them to, they would be much more receptive to a party that is “stuck in the past.”

  3. VERNON LISTON says:

    I am holding my breath when the media talks about the Democrat’s gender gap and what they should do to appeal to male voters who are the minority in this country.




Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.