Commentary Magazine


“An Immodest Agenda&rdquo

To the Editor:

. . . Melville J. Ulmer [“Economic Futures,” February] says my book, An Immodest Agenda, deals with the nation’s need for “civility, ‘mutuality’ [caring], rationality, sympathy, and good will.” The last two are never so much as mentioned in my book. He faults my examination of the influence of Milton Friedman, Robert Nozick, and Friedrich von Hayek on conservative philosophy and the Reagan administration because none of these “holds a government position,” which is like saying that since Marx is not on the payroll of the USSR, he has no influence.

Mr. Ulmer writes that I do not mention, much less discuss, several topics in a book he criticizes as too long (460 pages)—among them, he says, “regional economic rivalries.” It is the subject of Chapter Seven. And so it goes.

I can only hope that the readers of COMMENTARY will at least open the covers of An Immodest Agenda to sample my discussion of human values, family, school, and community, to see for themselves what I did write—and did not say.

Amitai Etzioni
University Professor
George Washington University
Washington, D.C.

_____________

 

Melville J. Ulmer writes:

Amitai Etzioni’s complaint reminds me of the response my young son received, many years ago, when he angrily called a playmate “a fat idiot.” Tearfully, his friend replied, “I’m not fat!” And so it is with Mr. Etzioni. I’ll readily grant, without checking, that he never once used the words “sympathy” or “good will” in his treatise. But he did stress the supposed need of the U.S. population for mutual “affection,” “caring and being cared for,” “shared concerns,” placing itself in “the voluntary service of larger objectives,” working toward “a higher level of commitment,” etc.; and he did oppose all this to what he termed the nation’s “excessive individualism.” At any rate, I did not score his ideals as such, but did point out that he advanced no clear or practical path for their realization. And who could, when such a path is viewed in the Etzioni manner as a concrete plan for “rebuilding America”? And at what cost? On such dreams the noble Chinese and Russian experiments were founded.

As for Mr. Etzioni’s discussion of Milton Friedman, von Hayek, et al., I faulted him not for including them, but for equating their views with the Reagan administration’s social philosophy, especially in the absence of more representative authorities. Nor did I charge that Mr. Etzioni’s book was too long, but only that it said too little in the (relatively) generous space allowed

Yes, as Mr. Etzioni says, he did discuss “regionalism,” but not in the context to which I referred. I cited six formidable and mostly menacing obstacles to peaceful community living today, which is of course one hundred steps below Mr. Etzioni’s lofty image of “mutuality.” The least imposing of the six was what I termed “regional economic rivalries,” the topic he touched on in another setting. The others, including such frightening phenomena as violent crime and racial tensions, he doesn’t even mention in his book, nor, of course, are they acknowledged in his letter.

No, I do not think that Mr. Etzioni needed additional pages for proper exposition. What is needed is a complete rewrite. For reasons made plain in my article, the count against An Immodest Agenda, as it stands, is that it is one of the most uninformative, vacantly pretentious, and boring books that have crossed my desk within memory.

About the Author




Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.