Commentary Magazine


Macdonald's Case

To the Editor:

A little of the old steam
A little of the bold steam—
That’s what will keep the kramer1 from the
   door.

   You can snarl at second-rate books,
   Find the fraud in all those Great Books,
       Twist the tail of Adler, Mortimer J.2

   You can polemize with Trotsky,3
   Show the Bible’s gone to potsky,4
       Colin Wilson’s epidermis you can flay.5

   You can judge the Ford Foundation,6
   Discourse on cinematization,
       With instances from Griffiths to today.7

But—
   A little of the old steam,
   A little of the bold steam,
   Or Hilton Kramer’s baying at the door.

And—
   It don’t count (no it don’t count)
   If it’s in that strictly no count
   That provincial adolescent schizophrenic
       deliquescent
   Languid effete and congenitally non-
       effervescent8
   Rag—and I don’t mean COMMENTARY.

_____________

 

1According to Miss Florabel Spurgeon’s Myth and Ritual in the Black Forest (Chatto & Windo, 1905), those woodcutters who had not chopped down their quota of Established Reputations were visited at night by a “kramer,” a small rodent-like creature which nibbled at their toes, until they got back to work.

2“The Book-of-the-Millennium dub,” New Yorker, Nov. 29, 1952.

3“Varieties of Political Experience,” New Yorker, March 28, 1959.

4“The Bible in Modern Undress,” New Yorker, Nov. 14, 1953.

5See “Reader’s Indigestion,” New Yorker, Oct. 13, 1956, in which I performed for The Outsider much the same service I later did for another best-seller in COMMENTARY.

6See New Yorker, Nov. 26-Dec. 17, 1955.

7“The Lost Art,” New Yorker, March 15, 1958.

8The adjectives are mostly authentic kramerisms. In my intellectual retirement, I like to compare the holiday doodlings of mine listed above with the kramer’s apodictic sentence on the New Yorker’s treatment of art & letters: “Yet, behind this air of relaxation, one could not help detecting the terrifying relentlessness with which a serious subject—and a subject, moreover, in which the writer’s vital personal response counts for a great deal—had been parodied, trimmed, ridiculed, and finally made boring and absurd by the author’s attempt to make it seem completely effortless, utterly common-sensical, and open to the most easygoing attention” (wow).

Dwight MacDonald
New York City

_____________

 

About the Author




Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.