Commentary Magazine


Test Scores Vs. Discrimination

To the editor:

In “Gateway to the Colleges” (June), Spencer Brown seems to doubt the validity of testing the “knowledge or skill” of a college applicant through the multiple-choice questions used by the College Entrance Examination Board. I fully agree that many mental qualities cannot be measured by this kind of testing. These test results, however, are only one of a number of factors influencing admissions decisions. Their principal value, the College Board directors say, is to provide a sharper description of the candidate’s mind and increase the accuracy with which his performance in college courses can be predicted.

Discrimination would be much more prevalent than it now is if there were no method of standardizing college aptitude. Differential treatment of Jewish applicants has occurred most frequently where the admissions process has unduly weighted qualities which cannot be measured by objective tests. When New York and Kansas City applicants can be compared by means of the same measuring rod, it is much more difficult for a college to make discriminatory admissions decisions.

Lawrence Bloomgarden
American Jewish Committee
New York City

_____________

 

Mr. Brown writes:

I am grateful to Mr. Bloomgarden for bringing up an important point that I did not have space to deal with in my article. If he is right, and I hope he is, he has adduced a powerful argument for the College Board examinations—though not necessarily for their present form. Yet I suspect he may be unduly optimistic. Racial or religious discrimination can be practiced with or without examination scores. Naturally, whenever other things are equal, the candidate with the higher scores is preferred. But other things never are equal. And social “acceptability” or extra-curricular zeal or “leadership” or some other more or less imaginary quality may be used as a criterion for unfair selection. In Mr. Bloomgarden’s illustration, I should guess that the candidate from Kansas City (or a fortiori from Laramie) is practically always preferred, at an Eastern college, to the candidate from New York unless their College Board scores are grotesquely disparate. “Geographical distribution” is still a formidable hindrance to fairness in college admissions.

I should be sorry if my article gave Mr. Bloomgarden the impression that I wished to abolish the examinations. Fortunately, that would be about as difficult as abolishing income taxes. I am in favor of standards and examinations; but I know the present examinations need radical revision.

_____________

 

About the Author




Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.