How about Robert McFarlane? (if you have the tiiiiiime….)

just kidding, Bud, really!

People are outraged that I say this but it is true.

People would have to take you seriously in order to become outraged.

Don’t hold your breath.

(1) He accused the US of starting wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to win votes in elections….

(2) “The US government has made a series of mistakes in the past few decades,” Ahmadinejad said an interview with the Los Angeles Times. “The imposition on the US economy of the years of heavy military engagement and involvement around the world … the war in Iraq, for example. These are heavy costs imposed on the US economy. “The world economy can no longer tolerate the budgetary deficit and the financial pressures occurring from markets here in the United States, and by the US government,” he added.

He said that in September 2008.

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2008-09/24/content_7054711.htm

Number (1) above I know to be true. Yes, we did not go to war because of WMDs, imposing freedom, nor even for oil. Bush took us to war for political capital and for his legacy. Not even the Left is willing to spell this out. People are outraged that I say this but it is true.

Number (2) is so true but the right will say the opposite, that war and military spending are what stimulates the economy!

the slient majority carried the day

In honor of both the Iranian and American presidential farces, I intend to go breakfast on bacon now.

But who am I to have an opinion? Michelle Obama has always struck me as a dead ringer for the “well-hung” dentist in the movie M*A*S*H, in drag with a long-haired wig and heels.

I hope Obama will wake up and smell the roses, that him making nice with Iran, will only help ruling party and not the people. Does Obama care that there are more women political prisoners in Iran than anywhere else. Does Obama know that religious minorities have no rights over there? Does he care that if you convert to Christianity you will get killed? does he know that peaceful Sufis are being killed? Why is he in such a hurry to make nice with these terrorists?

Mousavi was PM when Iran blew up the barracks in Beirut and killed 243 marines, when they blew up the US Embassy, when they took hostages throughout Lebanon, he was almost certainly involved in the Iran-Contra affair, he was PM while Iran was setting up and establishing Hezbollah, while they cemented their position as the #1 state sponsor of terror in the world…and he’s a reformer?

The poster who compared him to Abbas is spot on. A more presentable, less scary face to the world.

But I do think the Pasdaran messed up by giving Ahmadinejad 66% or thereabout. No one believes that. If they were smart, they would have had him win by a much closer margin, say 53% or something. Very close, but enough to avoid the runoff. Everyone would have thought Mousavi made a valiant effort and fell just short.

At least Hezbollah lost in Lebanon.

Hopefully Bibi doesn’t roll over on Sunday but it appears he’s going to do just that. Is he really going to be the PM who gives up both Hebron and Jerusalem to the PLO? Does he not remember the most famous words in the history of Israel “Har Ha-Bayit b’Yadenu”. Does he want his epitaph to be “Har Ha-Bayit b’Yadehem”?

I wasn’t listening.

:)

Seriously, though. Six months in. Ever.

Is ANYONE in the MSM going to point out what a tool/fool this imposter is?

still, obscuranto or no, does more in two than the lot in twenty, for sure!

Wow. I hadn’t considered that. Barry’s insufferable hubris has made him screw the pooch this time. ha. pass the popcorn.

What about a President Flapdoodle nightly cartoon show?

Please, FOX, do something!

Or perhaps J Crater? :)

I think FOX seriously needs a late night comedy hour.

We need a nightly dose of President Ondomo pontificating endless platitudes of flapdoodle.

At this moment, it appears that he was, like some of his supporters, eager to take credit, deserved or not, for having virtually willed a “better” result, and for characterizing it as hopeful almost no matter what.

In the novel, some p-o’d CIA analyst intentionally shaped the intelligence to coax the hated Prez or some hated adviser out on a limb.

OK – if Ahmadinejad’s victory margin is as reported, then it’s a fraud, and, see, the Cairo speech and the great fist un-clenching is um… no… OK… Well, now all the world can see that Iran’s phony democracy is phony, and anything that happens there won’t be our fault… um… Wait, no, see, OK – this one’ll work: We’ve given legitimacy to the reformers, even if we appeared to be lending legitimacy…

James Jones, it was his fault, but he’s on the way out, and this might be a good weekend to be caught playing with Bo. Or would that be considered too offensive to our new best friends in the Middle East?

Image is everything, these days. A good looking first lady of Iran would make Israel’s morally inevitable strike on Iran even less popular with the Obama bunch that it would otherwise be.

If Ahmadi doesn’t win…I’d be even more wary of the ‘Honey, I’m home!’ reformist.

Why on earth would the Mullah’s(Supreme Fubar included) dump Ahamd?

Hope and change for me, but not for thee.

The State Department says that Hugo Chavez’s president-for-life referendum, was “a process that was fully consistent with democratic process”

For Moussavi is also claiming victory. More than that, he’s openly alleging widespread voter fraud and election rigging

i wonder if the O! sent over acorn to help imadinnerjacket

Let’s hope the Administration is denied the illusion of a circumspect Iranian administration. That the danger remains stark and undeniable is for the best.

Well. Color me disappointed.