X

Email Address:

Password:

Forgot password?
OK

Commentary

Sign In | Home | Customer Service | About Us | Advertise

advanced search
  • Subscribe
  • Give a Gift
  • Renew
  • Register Online
  • Customer Service
  • Back Issues
  • Buy Articles
  • Donate
    1. The Madness of Crowds
      John Steele Gordon
      November 2008
    2. Obama's Leftism
      Joshua Muravchik
      October 2008
    3. Putin and the Polite Pundits
      Arthur Herman
      October 2008
    4. Sending Iran's Regrets
      Michael J. Totten
    5. 1948, Israel, and the Palestinians: Annotated Text
      Efraim Karsh
  1. The Madness of Crowds
    John Steele Gordon
    November 2008
  2. Obama's Leftism
    Joshua Muravchik
    October 2008
  3. Putin and the Polite Pundits
    Arthur Herman
    October 2008
  4. 1948, Israel, and the Palestinians: Annotated Text
    Efraim Karsh
  5. Sending Iran's Regrets
    Michael J. Totten

Advertisement



contensions.jpg
about us | contact us | archive | contributors | subscribe to commentary | advertise | RSS

Advertisement

« Syria's Useful Israeli Idiots
Campus Progress, Regressing »

Bin Laden’s All-Out War

James Kirchick - 10.24.2007 - 2:28 PM

Osama bin Laden released a message Tuesday, calling on jihadists to attack “the Crusader invaders,” not just in Iraq, but also in the Darfur region of Sudan.

Bin Laden must have a rather expansive understanding of who constitutes “Crusader Invaders.” After all, the only peacekeepers in Darfur right now belong to a 7,000-strong force from African Union member states. Come January, this force will be reconstituted as a 31,000-man United Nations peacekeeping deployment known as the United Nations African Union Mission in Darfur (UNAMID), authorized by the Security Council in July. It will be headed by a Nigerian commander with a Rwandan Deputy Commander. Yesterday, Rwanda dispatched 800 soldiers to Darfur (with the help of U.S. transport planes; to bin Laden this must make them collaborators with the Great Satan). But there has been no serious proposal to send American troops to Darfur, nor is there likely to be. As it is currently constituted, UNAMID will comprise forces mainly from African countries, with 95 percent of the infantry African. The only Western countries to provide significant levels of support are Norway and Sweden, which have collectively offered 400 military engineers.

So it is not just the American military that bin Laden considers an infidel army that must be fought anywhere and everywhere, but also apparently the rag-tag African soldiers sent on humanitarian peacekeeping missions and the Norwegians and the Swedes. So much for the contention that it is only those countries in Iraq that elicit the jihadist anger.

Islamic militants like bin Laden pride themselves on their contention that Islam is universal, that it ignores racial, ethnic and national differences in its ability to unite all believers under a caliphate, the dar al-Islam (land of Islam). Yet with this latest pronouncement, bin Laden has revealed his Arab supremacist roots: shilling for an Arab Muslim regime killing black Muslims.

»Back to Contentions »Back to Commentary

del.icio.us del.icio.us
Google Google
Facebook Facebook
Email This Post Print This Post Permanent Link To Article


This entry was posted on Wednesday, October 24th, 2007 at 2:28 PM and is filed under Contentions. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Bin Laden’s All-Out War”

  1. 1
    Richard F. Says:
    October 24th, 2007 at 3:42 PM

    To bin Laden, the victim defines the enemy. Under his notion of Muslim supremacism, the kuffar is the only force interested in attacking Muslims or their lands; hence, the very presence of kuffars in the Sudan is an offense to the Muslim janjeweeds and their co-religionists running the country. By definition, such an enemy (regardless of the actual national, ethnic or even religious composition of the force) can only be kuffars. In orthodox Islam, there is no concept of unjustified aggression by Muslims against the kuffar. The kuffar, simply by being a kuffar, invites attack; and even where he does not invite attack, that is, does not provoke one, the Muslim remains obligated to make one.

Leave a Reply

Advertisement

image of latest cover
image of latest cover

FREE SAMPLE ISSUE

  • the complete archive
  • hundreds of authors
  • thousands of articles
  • American history
    since 1945

ENTER THE ARCHIVE

ADVERTISER LINKS

Used Cars
Car Loans
Car Finance
Bad Car Credit
Debt Management
Concert Tickets 
Compare Secured Loans
Life Insurance
Boat Hire
Secured Loans



Advertisement


Advertisement

Commentary is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).



Home | Subscribe | About Us | Donate | Advertise | Contact Us | Legal Notices | RSS

Commentar

Copyright © 1997-2008 Commentary Magazine
All Rights Reserved