<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Clayton</title>
	<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/munson/2024</link>
	<description>The blog of Commentary Magazine.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 08:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Suderman</title>
		<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/munson/2024#comment-84042</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Suderman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/munson/2024#comment-84042</guid>
		<description>I certainly enjoyed Spartan -- I'm a huge Mamet fan.  And maybe I could've been more clear about Clayton; I honestly enjoyed it quite a bit -- even thought it was a good bit better than Spartan.  But it didn't (and doesn't) strike me as an Oscar-class film, and it generally just doesn't feel the sort of thing that usually gets nominated.  It's doesn't fit into the usual categories -- it's not an epic, a period piece, an indie breakout, or an art-house gem. It isn't even really a deeply issue-oriented film. It didn't generate it much chatter, and it was so under seen that it's being rereleased.  So it's not that I didn't enjoy the film -- I very much did.  But it does seem like a weird fit for a Best Picture nod.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly enjoyed Spartan &#8212; I&#8217;m a huge Mamet fan.  And maybe I could&#8217;ve been more clear about Clayton; I honestly enjoyed it quite a bit &#8212; even thought it was a good bit better than Spartan.  But it didn&#8217;t (and doesn&#8217;t) strike me as an Oscar-class film, and it generally just doesn&#8217;t feel the sort of thing that usually gets nominated.  It&#8217;s doesn&#8217;t fit into the usual categories &#8212; it&#8217;s not an epic, a period piece, an indie breakout, or an art-house gem. It isn&#8217;t even really a deeply issue-oriented film. It didn&#8217;t generate it much chatter, and it was so under seen that it&#8217;s being rereleased.  So it&#8217;s not that I didn&#8217;t enjoy the film &#8212; I very much did.  But it does seem like a weird fit for a Best Picture nod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael J. Totten</title>
		<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/munson/2024#comment-83984</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael J. Totten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/munson/2024#comment-83984</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Spartan&lt;/i&gt; was awesome. No one I know in the world, except my wife, has even heard of that movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Spartan</i> was awesome. No one I know in the world, except my wife, has even heard of that movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
